Music Speaks (African Music… a continuation of the Oral Tradition).

Authors Avatar

                L. Nunley        

MUSIC SPEAKS

(African Music… a continuation of the Oral Tradition)

By

Loren Nunley

Narratives of African Civilizations

Clyde Taylor

1 December 2003

From a performer’s standpoint Abdullah Ibrahim has an incredible technical ability, the product of remarkable and meticulous practice.  Yet his artistry is less a matter of speed or technical prowess than of a certain passion, born of a sense of discipline and integrity.  Almost mystical, his genius is rooted in a tradition that developed long before the trumpets of the new world blared from British ships.

This tradition of orality dates back to the beginning of time.  All literate cultures grew out of an oral culture at some point in their evolution: all cultures rely on communication through speech and aural perception.  Although the oral tradition originates from a ritual of secrecy, through music it is passed down to the masses, not just those ‘entitled’ to it.  “Music is seen as one of the most striking manifestations of culture, for it is at once thought and action.”  This is the magic of music.

“It infuses,” as Lord Hailey has put it, “the activities of the African from the cradle to the grave.”  Music is a connecting link between cultural values and political life; it is a vital medium of communication that contributes to the maintenance and persistence of the political system of which it is a part.  Both historically and presently, music has served Africa as an instrument of political communication, transmitting political information and values, mobilizing the population, evoking and sustaining its pride and identity.  There has been little detailed examination of the social role of the musician or griot in the various West African societies, and an adequate definition of that role, based on the various activities of the musician, is difficult to articulate.  The griot has been called a musician, counselor, bard and herald; a genealogist; a chancellor, master of ceremonies, traditionalist, and archivist; a praiser; an historian; a spokesman and minister plenipotentiary.  While hardly inclusive, these terms suggest the range of activities once performed by musicians in West African societies.

Though the activities of the musician are diverse, varying from one social context to another, certain characteristics may be used to define the social status of the musician.  The griot, or dyeli as he is known in the Mandé languages, is a craft specialist.  Unlike the smith or tanner, however, he deals not in tangible materials, but with the impalpable: the word.  The dyeli is the artisan of the word, spoken and sung.  The social status of the musician is conditioned, in part, by the stratification system which characterizes most West African societies.  Craft specialists, smiths, tanners and musicians, for example, were socially and politically subordinate, often attached to or dependent on, noble families.  Among the various castes the musician was often the lowest ranked.

The dyeli Mamadou Kouyaté, from the epic tale of Sundjata, explains the relation of the griot to authority in these words: “I have instructed kings in the history of their ancestors in order that the life of the ancients serve as an example for them, for the world is old and the future springs from the past… Griots know the history of kings and kingdoms, that is why they are the best counselors of kings.”  As the clients of king or noble the griot sang his praises and those of his ancestors.  As a servant of power, the griot performed a number of other activities which, though intermittent, can serve to outline the political role of the musician.  As interpreter and spokesman of the ruler, the griot was a channel of political information.  Most obviously, the words of the ruler were communicated directly to those assembled at the court, but instructions, orders, and other types of political information were also diffused throughout the community by means of griots.

Join now!

Not only was the griot a channel of political communication from a ruler to ruled, but there is evidence to suggest that the musician also served as a channel of feedback from ruled to ruler.  The ability of the griot to act as a feedback channel, from the community to its authorities, is also suggested by the nature of African music.  Music making is not the exclusive domain of musicians.  Often it is spontaneous and topical.  African songs are not only improvised and relevant; their subjects are often specifically political, for they present evaluations of public policy personnel.  Given the use of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay