Sex generalisations and stereotypes.

Authors Avatar

Jane Bradley

English Language Coursework Investigation

Introduction

        

        As early as 1847, women were described in terms of appearance rather than character traits or achievements, and this can be seen in Mr. Rochester’s description of Blanche Ingram in ‘Jane Eyre’ (1847); “a strapper, a real strapper, Jane: big, brown, and buxom.” This is a frequently used stereotypical view of women, and in my project I aim to discover whether this aspect of representation is still prevalent in the media of today.

        This subject appealed to me, especially the research by Jennifer Coates and Angela Goddard, which, although based on speech, provided some explanation for the widespread inference that women are subordinate to men. For example, it was found by Beiley and Time in 1976 that women use expletives far less in conversation than men, with the connotation that this trend is a result of women being gentler, and less aggressive than men, and therefore less powerful.

        However, this research was completed by Coates in 1982 and, since then, there have been few extensive studies of gender representation in the media. However, at present there is pressure on most aspects of society to be politically correct and non-sexist, and sexual equality is a standard expectation.

        Women are constantly discussed in a variety of media, including tabloid and broadsheet newspapers, and also ‘teen magazines,’ such as ‘Mizz,’ and ‘J17,’ aimed at girls from the age of 11 and onwards. Iconic women are often discussed in a variety of media, with examples ranging from Princess Diana to Madonna, although the way in which these figures are represented differs dramatically. This is also dependent on each publication’s style, content and readership, and these are aspects that I intend to explore in my investigation.

        I will also be analysing the theories of existing research, such as Miller and Swift’s observations of non-parallel treatment of men and women; for instance, women are frequently described in terms of their relationship to men, but not the other way round. I aim to examine whether this research, conducted in 1981, is still applicable to modern newspapers and magazines.

        My expectations of this assignment include finding some development towards sexual equality in the media, but also a continued bias against women, shown by language traits such as marked terms, emotive language, and sexist generalisations.


English Language Coursework Investigation

Methodology

        To complete this investigation, I needed to collect data to analyse, which would be representative of the current portrayal of women in the media. In order to do this, I gathered a variety of newspapers and magazines, with different purposes and target audiences. These ranged from broadsheet newspapers, such as The Guardian, which are generally classified as having middle-class, educated readers, to tabloids such as The Sun, which are aimed at a working-class audience.

        I also looked at “teen magazines,” with a younger, predominantly female readership, although I decided not to analyse these in depth as part of my investigation, as their language is simplistic, and so the depth they could be analysed in is usually limited. I collected articles based on women, and these were usually celebrities, such as the Spice Girl, Mel B, and Michael Barrymore’s wife and manager, Cheryl, who were both featured in tabloid stories. I also looked at journalism focusing in “female issues,” such as the lesbianism and single-motherhood, as the content and opinions given in these articles is reflected by their linguistic styles.

        As stated in my introduction, there is little existing current research on my chosen subject, and although in the past there have been several extensive studies of gender variation in language, these focus primarily on speech, such as Trudgill’s analysis of linguistic differences between men and women (1972), and also Lakoff’s controversial study of 1975, which suggested that “women use language to collude in their own subordination.” Other research more relevant to my project includes the examination of sex-specification in language by Trager in 1931, which observed that the only impersonal pronoun in English is “one,” which in Britain is regarded as typifying aristocratic or formal speech, and is therefore only used in a narrow context. This differs significantly from the informal usage of the French pronoun “on.” Further research was executed on this aspect by Titcomb (1955), which looked specifically at the use of pronouns in the popular press, and also Archer in 1975. Further studies on gender differences relating to language are Hole and Levine’s 1971 article, “The Politics of Language,” and also Gornick and Moran’s “Women in Sexist Society: Studies in Power and Powerlessness,” of the same year, which discussed language as a means of attaining or designating power, a feature often utilised in media representation. This summary of existing research shows that language and gender is an interesting yet complex topic, and is indicative of my reasons for selecting the aspect of media representation of women as the focus of my project. However, this investigation into existing material was useful and informative, and of great value to my project.

Join now!

        Another part of my research involved using the Internet, including a feminist web site with a detailed overview of existing work on language and gender variation. Again, the majority of these were based on speech, although they remained interesting and informative. Also, Angela Goddard, who has completed extensive studies on this aspect of language, recently published a book, ‘Language and Gender,’ (2000), examining written language, such as that used by newspapers and magazines. I found this invaluable as a research tool and a source of background information, but although there were some references to gender bias in the media, these ...

This is a preview of the whole essay