• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Shaming is an under-used resource in crime control. Discuss

Extracts from this document...


Shaming is an under-used resource in crime control. Discuss. It has been suggested that shaming is an under-used resource in crime control. This raises issues over what shaming is, how it works, and what affect it can have on crime control and crime rates. To address these questions, I begin by explaining what shaming is and how it is used in practice, looking at both retributive and reintegrative shaming. I move on to discuss the weaknesses and strengths of shaming, incorporating discussion of theories underpinning why people commit crimes for the purposes of illustrating how far shaming may work. Finally, I consider how successful use of shaming could impact on crime rates and demonstrate the potential wider effect on rehabilitation, recidivism and prison populations. Shaming takes two forms, retributive and reintegrative (McLaughlin et al, 2003, p6; Hughes, 2001, p285). Retributive shaming involves stigmatising the offender, with public contempt shown for their actions. A consequence may be a prison sentence, excluding the individual from society. Emphasis is on punishing the criminal act and not on any possible prevention of future crime (McLaughlin et al, 2003 pp6-7). This is the standard model of law enforcement and crime control in the UK (Hughes, 2001, p258). Reintegrative shaming has a different focus. ...read more.


Furthermore, the offender condemns their condemners and appeals to the higher loyalties of their own subculture, both techniques of which affirm the validity of their actions (Sykes and Matza, pp234-236). As a crucial component of reintegrative shaming is acknowledgment of wrong-doing and acceptance of responsibility for their actions by the offender with an accompanying will to put things right, it can be seen that techniques of neutralisation form a powerful barrier to shaming, and are a fundamental weakness in its use as a crime control resource. Another weakness in the application of shaming is society itself. Braithwaite (2003, pp396-398) demonstrates how shaming works well in Japan. However, Japanese culture is more homogenous than is Western society, and holds respect in higher esteem (Hughes, 2001, p285). Shaming is used to great effect in New Zealand, where family conferences have success in determining responses to offending. But this relies on a strong family-orientated, communitarian society (Hughes, 2001, p286). The UK does not have this societal philosophy, with increasing numbers of divorce, lone parents and geographically dispersed families (Hall, 1998, pp10-11) Furthermore, research shows that poorly-educated, unemployed young men from ethic minority backgrounds feature most prominently in court proceedings, crime figures and prison (Box, 2003, p272; Sparks, 2001, p216). There is a worry that shaming could be used to further marginalise and remove power from already subordinate groupings, as happened to the Aboriginal people of Australia (Hughes, 2001, p288). ...read more.


On a lower level, it teaches people right from wrong, so that on a higher level the notion of committing criminal acts becomes unthinkable. Shaming goes beyond deterrence and connects individuals with their inner conscience. It can be seen that shaming has both strengths and weaknesses, with critics arguing that offenders will exploit restorative measures for their own gain. In addition, offenders' motives for criminality impact on how successful shaming may be; not all offenders lose family and peer status through offending, rendering shaming useless. Furthermore, techniques of neutralisation dilute the possible effects of shaming, as offenders rationalise their behaviour and cast themselves as the victim. This all sounds depressing, and shaming has a tough battle to fight. But the arguments for shaming are compelling. By engaging an individual's moral-emotional response to their own behaviour, shaming can cut youth crime and in doing so perhaps halt potential career criminals. Recidivism is reduced and, in the long-term, so too could be prison populations, allowing the fostering of more successful rehabilitation programmes. The end result could be more effective prisons promoting alternatives to crime for offenders upon release, less crime, fewer victims and enhanced societal quality of life. Shaming may be seen by some as a risk but, should the criminal justice system and society at large have the courage to pursue it as a crime control resource, the rewards could be very high. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminology essays

  1. Who is to blame for crime: the individual or society?

    However, in youth values, pleasure, excitement, adventure and freedoms are more important to them. Therefore, teenagers may feel their parents were too stubborn in controlling their life. This could be explained by attachment style, according to Hirschi (1969), attachment between parent and child is paramount and that the strength of

  2. Compare positivist approaches to crime with at least two other perspectives discussed in the ...

    It is not an absolute prediction that everyone with these characteristics will commit crime (Alexiadis, 2004:49). A final problematic issue is the methodology in the studies of biological positivism. The methodology used might be labelled as simplistic and consequently the conclusions about 'real' or 'significant' differences between criminals and non-criminals can in fact be highly speculative (Department of Criminology, 2006/07:3-9).

  1. Criminological Theory: Explaining Crime. This essay will look at how the subcultural theories ...

    This can be linked with the idea that individuals may commit acts of theft for excitement as they may not be involved in any non-deviant activities that can bring excitement. Finally, a weak social bond of 'belief' may lead to deviant behaviour as an individual who does not believe

  2. Domestic violence. The following essay will concentrate on patriarchal-terrorism (Gilchrist et al. 2004) meaning ...

    American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 62, 264-275. Schultz, L.G. (1960). The Wife Assaulter. Journal of Social Therapy, 6, 103-12. Shipley, S. and Arrigo, B.A. (2001). The Confusion over Psychopathy (II): Implications for Forensic (Correctional).Practice. in International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45(4), 2001, 407-420 Shipway, L.

  1. Crime is a Social Construct. Discuss in relation to two criminological theories.

    Mayhew's research on vandalism on double Decker buses backs up this theory. He found that there was 20 times more vandalism on upper levels of double Decker buses rather than the lower which are in constant surveillance from the driver (Mayhew et al, 1976, as cited by Maguire et al, 2002 p.60).

  2. Explain the emergence of left and right realist criminologist and evaluate their strengths and ...

    Left realism has four elements to the theory which are victims, offender, state and informal controls. The "victim" is the concern for the consequences of crime for victims and the neighbourhoods. The victim surveys attempt to find out what this exactly means at a local level or to a simple understanding.

  1. The prison system in England and Wales could reasonably be described as being in ...

    It means that the workforce, although small, become well acquainted with their inmates and also highly skilled, gathering experience at a rapid pace, due to the increased working hours.

  2. The origins of the criminological imagination lay with C. Wright Mills and his book ...

    Another role the criminological imagination plays is a legislative one (Bauman 1987). Critical criminology has provided new ideas about how not only society but the criminal justice system can be structured in alternative methods. Understanding what ?crime? actually is, maybe one of the most important strands in the criminological imagination.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work