The Tyranny of Initial Conditions.

Authors Avatar

Part IB Open Book Examination 2003

The Tyranny of Initial Conditions

THE TYRANNY OF INITIAL CONDITIONS

‘Any commitment to social change is underlain by the belief that existing conditions are, for whatever reason, unsatisfactory. For those geographers content with the contemporary world order, the message of critical geography will be irrelevant. However, for those unhappy with the conditions that permit people to die of famine in eastern Africa, to live in cardboard boxes on the streets of London, to be subjected to racial violence in the United States… then the message of committed practice is one that cannot go unheeded.

It is a message of social action.’

-Unwin (1992)

‘I do sometimes wonder at all the masses of stuff we produce, and question what really drives it… [I] believe that your next article, or project, should derive from some passion greater than simply adding another item to your CV or to the Departmental Output Count.’

  • Massey (2001)

INTRODUCTION

        An inherent, dualistic and tyrannical tension currently faces professional geographers, on e which seeks to confront the injustices of society and an institutional basis and system which seeks to maintain the realities of the present. The new ‘critical’ geographies that have emerged during the late 1990s draw upon a long history of interaction between geographical knowledge and political ideas and activism. Within a discipline where the Left has achieved an almost hegemonic status, questions of inequality, oppression, and exclusion form a range of initial conditions that are often considered unjustified and tyrannical by the academy (Tickell, 1995). For many, the tyrant has been identified as a neo-liberalist version of capitalism that challenges local democracy and independence via its globalising and techno-centric imagery and rhetoric. Yet, the tyranny of initial conditions can also be applied in a very different but related way for many professional geographers, exemplified by writing of Massey (2001) quoted above. Initial conditions of employment within the academy have changed drastically over the past 50 years, imposing discourses of the ‘utility’ of the knowledge produced, accountability, increased financial constraint, increased flexibilization of the labour process and . The whole project of academia has been questione, the myth of value free science eradicated and through poststructuralist and postmodern insights, the social and ingherently poltical nature of our geographical knowledge revealed. This essay will argue that the tyranny of initial conditions is forcing academics to reconsider the link between theory and practice and to engage in new forms of dialogue with civil society to enable an emancipatory and pluralistic vision of the future. Political options in terms of how this may be achieved and the disciplinary, ethical and moral barriers which stand in its way will be debated. The drive for new ‘critical’ critical geographies will be contextualised in the disciplinary context of the history of radical geography and contemporary social, economic and political dynamics. Examples from the sub-discipline of economic geography will be used to back up my arguments. Lastly, the synergistic relationship between theory and practice will be shown to have a vital importance for the successful future of the discipline of geography.  Linking the theory and practice of geographical imaginations raises a host of questions that should be addressed.. what is the role of the academic within society? Do geographers have unique and valid contribution to make? To society? Whay and according to whom?        

        It is necessary to state from the outset, that I am aware that this piece of writing . As an undergraduate enmeshed in academic power relations in tersm of knwoeldge, . A a person who cannot understand the importance of the radical gegroahry from the 1970s from first hand experience… white… knowledge is siruate din  a particular nexus of social relations.

THE POLITICAL CONSTRUCTION OF ALL KNOWLEDGE

The historical relationship between western geographical endeavour and political projects do not make easy reading for those associated with the discipline.

The origins of the ‘geographical tradition’ and its links with imperialism and colonialism have been discussed at length (for example, see ). The ‘scietntific’ rationale of environemtnal determinism espoused by Semple in , was used on a number of occasions to justifiy the supremacy of white tempereate, (for example, see Frenkels 1992 work on the construction of the Paname Canal ). The use of Ratzels’ concept of Lensraum, room to breath for the organic state, by Hettner to support the Nazi ideology of expansion. These illustrations serve to provide only a brief glimpse of the way that geographical claims to knowledge and truth can have significant impacts upon peoples’ lives. A critical, and importantly, political take on geographical understanding is crucial for geographical imaginations that serve to emancipate and illuminate inequalities within and exclusions from society. In calling for a new critical geography, it is essential that we are clear about the political intentions of related academic research.  

All knowledge is political, a claim to truth and power.

‘Written words, even those of economic geographers, can have serious material effects, and thereby require critical scrutiny… texts are not innocent –merely words – or without consequence. They don’t just describe the world, but re-make it. As people who live in the world we have a right and responsibility to criticise, applaud, challenge, or support them.’ (Barnes, 2001)

Peet (1998) identifies five levels of abstraction for academic work and knowledge, metaphilosophy, philosophy, social theory, theory and practice. All divorced from real geography of physical and material practices by mental processes of simplification, generalization and essentializing. Inherently political process immersed in power relations through processes of practice, research, theory, critique, teaching, publication. Relations of domination and control, In academia, status reigns and power informs every sentence and gesture.

Join now!

Academics link with practice in several ways.. through teaching, shape ideas being transmitted, research reveals inadequacies and potentialities… react to broader context of societal crises, urgencies and pragmatic requirements while disciplines contend for position. Intensely political reaction for it involves utility or critique, accountability or opposition to the existing social order.

There is no such thing as a neutral assessment either of the structure of social existence in the sense of ontologies or of the truth or even adequacy of theories in the sense of epistemologies – there are only political ontologies and political epistemologies. (Peet)

Knowledge ...

This is a preview of the whole essay