• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

THERE IS NO LONGER A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MANAGEMENT OF THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

THERE IS NO LONGER A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MANAGEMENT OF THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR The last twenty years have seen major changes within the public sector. The conservative government changes during the 1980's to 1990's saw them introduce improved services and long awaited improved efficiencies in the welfare state for instance. The reforms which took place by the conservative government, and latterly by the Labour government completely altered the way in which public sector management is carried out, thus leading us to the statement "There is no longer a difference between management of the public and private sector". Without a clear measurement of success, the public sector has often had measures imposed upon it in the form of performance indicators. Such indicators usually concentrate on a quantitative approach, examining elements of service, which can be measured (e.g. school truancy levels, hospital waiting times). Whilst many such indicators are important in the measurement of economy and efficiency, they are limited in accurately appraising effectiveness, which can only be properly examined through qualitative methods. The largest external influences resulting in the change in public sector in the last twenty years is political, legal, economic and socio cultural. The political agenda in the 1980's had several core themes. In order to change the way public sector was being managed, the government needed to alter the whole culture of the public sector and initiate and implement quite radical reforms. ...read more.

Middle

These new 'not for profit' organisations were then able to attract private finance and invest in their neglected stocks and meet the requirements of the Decent Homes Standards by 2010. The managers of LSVT's and ALMO's have had to adapt to heavily involving their customers in matters concerning service delivery. The service delivery, greatly improved efficiency, quality and cost effectiveness was paramount. The overall corporate and strategic aims and objectives of the organisations was the focus of the new public sector managers. They are accountable on a greater scale to their boards, Housing Corporation, Audit Commission and customers in general. Their performance is monitored on a larger scale and accountability is vital. They need to demonstrate long-term viability and sound financial planning. With the government's Efficiency Agenda, organisations are in the necessary position of making gains via pooling their expertise and experiences. Public sector mangers are acutely aware that the government is eager to create a competition between organisations (especially for funding) therefore the gains via efficiency vehicles is essential. The government introduced Compulsory Competitive Tendering (CCT), Private Finance Initiatives (PFI) thus making cost cutting the imperative for public sector managers. They further increased the use of strategic models such as SWOT and PEST analysis, aligning the public sector more closely to the private sector at the strategic level. ...read more.

Conclusion

Private sector managers are painfully aware they are completely accountable to customers and ignore the fact that this has proved extremely costly to many companies. Providing structures to make public sector units solely accountable to customers remains the most important challenge for New Public Management. Within the public sector, synergy is more problematic to achieve than the private sector because conflicts between performance measures, stakeholders, cultural thinking and less managerial scope for risk taking mean conditions for closer customer orientation are difficult to accomplish. Uncertain, unclear and potentially changing long term goals by stakeholders make environmental conditions more turbulent and subject to sharp alterations within the public sector. Evaluation of success between the public and private sector remains deeply different. While private sector performances can be examined against measurable and comparable targets, such as profits, production or sales, this is not so simple in the public sector, with often conflicting performance indicators imposed. In such circumstances it is often more practical to manage for stability instead of managing for change. The elements are however becoming more aligned with the private sector. The growth of technology and fundamental sifts in culture have meant that the time lapse between private sector initiatives being taken up by the public sector have been reduced. Technology has also greatly helped the public sector to become more responsive and has a crucial part to play in delivering services more closely with customer wishes and demands. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. Is there justification for government intervention in the uk housing market and how has ...

    buyer and seller may have incurred significant costs in legal fees, searches, surveys, etc. This can cause the terms to be renegotiated, delay exchange of contracts and even result in transactions failing altogether. 2. Extensive research has shown that the current system is extremely inefficient and wasteful and does not look after the best interests of buyers or sellers.

  2. Evaluate the development of social policy in the area of Housing

    The Labour MP Denis Howell faced public disgrace when he was found to be gaining money for warding building contracts to crooked construction firms. By 1964, one family in four lived in a house built since 1951. This achievement was somewhat overshadowed by Rouge landlords in the private sector the

  1. Edwin Chadwick and his success in public health

    Sanitation Commissioner and worked on improving sanitary conditions but many attempts made for further public health reform were blocked. In 1854, Lord Palmerston was appointed Home Secretary and although a supporter of Public Health reform, asked Chadwick to resign knowing that his unpopularity would prevent the Board of Health being strengthened whilst he was in charge.

  2. Fascism, as a subject of historical inquiry in twentieth-century Britain, has heretofore been examined ...

    must protect organisation, and not chaos."78 This was, while not in full, the essence of Mosley's corporate fascist plan. What is missing from the above is discussion of his plans for the Empire. The Empire was to play a large role in his overall economic plan, as he wrote in

  1. What are the main options facing the government on taxation and public spending?Should expenditure ...

    Tax avoidance measures should be eliminated so that the wealthy in the state cannot dodge paying their taxes. IBEC recommends that bands and tax credits are increased and that there should be no additional income tax levies introduced or any increase in existing levies.

  2. The Health of the People: Public Health and Social Policy 1832-1875

    Every working class person lived in cramped conditions. If there was an out breakout of one disease or another it could be very easily spread between family members and neighbours. Sanitation and Drainage: Because of the types of houses that were being built were to get the builders profit they didn't bother with sanitation or drainage to any decent level.

  1. The Commons no longer acts as a constraint on the executive.' Critically evaluate this ...

    Although in principle committees have the right to choose their area of inquiry and also to see relevant documents, things can once again be made difficult through the use of the 'Armstrong Memorandum'19. As one can see, holding the government to account can be difficult when the relevant information is problematic to uncover.

  2. Finance & Public Expenditure - A case study

    other places, due to the fixed-population weight in the Barnett formula, Scotland's share in the allocation of public fund also decreases whereas its public expenditure will remain the same. (McCrone,1999) In 2002, Scotland's share in the UK Government funds fell from the usual 11% down to 10.23%.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work