• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

THERE IS NO LONGER A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MANAGEMENT OF THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

THERE IS NO LONGER A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MANAGEMENT OF THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR The last twenty years have seen major changes within the public sector. The conservative government changes during the 1980's to 1990's saw them introduce improved services and long awaited improved efficiencies in the welfare state for instance. The reforms which took place by the conservative government, and latterly by the Labour government completely altered the way in which public sector management is carried out, thus leading us to the statement "There is no longer a difference between management of the public and private sector". Without a clear measurement of success, the public sector has often had measures imposed upon it in the form of performance indicators. Such indicators usually concentrate on a quantitative approach, examining elements of service, which can be measured (e.g. school truancy levels, hospital waiting times). Whilst many such indicators are important in the measurement of economy and efficiency, they are limited in accurately appraising effectiveness, which can only be properly examined through qualitative methods. The largest external influences resulting in the change in public sector in the last twenty years is political, legal, economic and socio cultural. The political agenda in the 1980's had several core themes. In order to change the way public sector was being managed, the government needed to alter the whole culture of the public sector and initiate and implement quite radical reforms. ...read more.

Middle

These new 'not for profit' organisations were then able to attract private finance and invest in their neglected stocks and meet the requirements of the Decent Homes Standards by 2010. The managers of LSVT's and ALMO's have had to adapt to heavily involving their customers in matters concerning service delivery. The service delivery, greatly improved efficiency, quality and cost effectiveness was paramount. The overall corporate and strategic aims and objectives of the organisations was the focus of the new public sector managers. They are accountable on a greater scale to their boards, Housing Corporation, Audit Commission and customers in general. Their performance is monitored on a larger scale and accountability is vital. They need to demonstrate long-term viability and sound financial planning. With the government's Efficiency Agenda, organisations are in the necessary position of making gains via pooling their expertise and experiences. Public sector mangers are acutely aware that the government is eager to create a competition between organisations (especially for funding) therefore the gains via efficiency vehicles is essential. The government introduced Compulsory Competitive Tendering (CCT), Private Finance Initiatives (PFI) thus making cost cutting the imperative for public sector managers. They further increased the use of strategic models such as SWOT and PEST analysis, aligning the public sector more closely to the private sector at the strategic level. ...read more.

Conclusion

Private sector managers are painfully aware they are completely accountable to customers and ignore the fact that this has proved extremely costly to many companies. Providing structures to make public sector units solely accountable to customers remains the most important challenge for New Public Management. Within the public sector, synergy is more problematic to achieve than the private sector because conflicts between performance measures, stakeholders, cultural thinking and less managerial scope for risk taking mean conditions for closer customer orientation are difficult to accomplish. Uncertain, unclear and potentially changing long term goals by stakeholders make environmental conditions more turbulent and subject to sharp alterations within the public sector. Evaluation of success between the public and private sector remains deeply different. While private sector performances can be examined against measurable and comparable targets, such as profits, production or sales, this is not so simple in the public sector, with often conflicting performance indicators imposed. In such circumstances it is often more practical to manage for stability instead of managing for change. The elements are however becoming more aligned with the private sector. The growth of technology and fundamental sifts in culture have meant that the time lapse between private sector initiatives being taken up by the public sector have been reduced. Technology has also greatly helped the public sector to become more responsive and has a crucial part to play in delivering services more closely with customer wishes and demands. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. Discuss the rationale and the role of public enterprises in the Caribbean.

    In 1970 the bauxite and sugar industries were taken over by the Guyanese government. By 1980 the government controlled about 80% of the formal economy. The Barbadian government took a pragmatic approach in their justification for the development of PEs in that country.

  2. Edwin Chadwick and his success in public health

    This part of Chadwick's role in securing the necessary support for public health legislation was significant as it raised awareness of the problems, putting more pressure on the government to act. The real breakthrough was in 1848 the new Liberal government finally passed the Public Health Act, Chadwick was appointed

  1. Evaluate the development of social policy in the area of Housing

    this one survey estimated that in 1951 there were 750,000 fewer houses than households (Fraser 1973 p209). However, the construction industry was badly hit by material shortages. Housing demand also increased with marriage and birth rates. The state took major responsibility for housing in this period.

  2. Is there justification for government intervention in the uk housing market and how has ...

    The issue of market failure arises centrally with regards to perfect information and access to capital markets and therefore looking at two new schemes, the Starter Home Initiative and production of a Home Information Pack (HIP) are of key relevance.

  1. What are the main options facing the government on taxation and public spending?Should expenditure ...

    Therefore, if the tax band is increased, it should be increased by 2.3%. Tax revenues are slowly falling. Last December, the Department of Finance was projecting exchequer deficits of 2.9 billion in 2003 and 3.7 billion in 2004. Yet the government will award many public service workers an average 9 per cent pay hike.

  2. The Health of the People: Public Health and Social Policy 1832-1875

    Privies were at the end of the street and there would be a gutter going through the back-to-back houses at an attempt and general drainage. The reason as to why the sanitation was so poor was because there was no one to stop the builders.

  1. European Union: Council of Ministers.

    "People can�t personally relate to Europe," says Sibylle Appel of the Berlin-based polling institute Forsa. "Therefore they tend to forget about it." Her studies reveal that most Germans can�t name even one of the country�s 99 Members of the European Parliament.

  2. Fascism, as a subject of historical inquiry in twentieth-century Britain, has heretofore been examined ...

    This, in turn, had the consequence of changing the attitudes of a large segment of the general populace in regards to the role of the government in managing the economy. Many lost sight of any personal qualms they previously might have had concerning receiving government assistance, and came to now

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work