• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

THERE IS NO LONGER A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MANAGEMENT OF THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

THERE IS NO LONGER A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MANAGEMENT OF THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR The last twenty years have seen major changes within the public sector. The conservative government changes during the 1980's to 1990's saw them introduce improved services and long awaited improved efficiencies in the welfare state for instance. The reforms which took place by the conservative government, and latterly by the Labour government completely altered the way in which public sector management is carried out, thus leading us to the statement "There is no longer a difference between management of the public and private sector". Without a clear measurement of success, the public sector has often had measures imposed upon it in the form of performance indicators. Such indicators usually concentrate on a quantitative approach, examining elements of service, which can be measured (e.g. school truancy levels, hospital waiting times). Whilst many such indicators are important in the measurement of economy and efficiency, they are limited in accurately appraising effectiveness, which can only be properly examined through qualitative methods. The largest external influences resulting in the change in public sector in the last twenty years is political, legal, economic and socio cultural. The political agenda in the 1980's had several core themes. In order to change the way public sector was being managed, the government needed to alter the whole culture of the public sector and initiate and implement quite radical reforms. ...read more.

Middle

These new 'not for profit' organisations were then able to attract private finance and invest in their neglected stocks and meet the requirements of the Decent Homes Standards by 2010. The managers of LSVT's and ALMO's have had to adapt to heavily involving their customers in matters concerning service delivery. The service delivery, greatly improved efficiency, quality and cost effectiveness was paramount. The overall corporate and strategic aims and objectives of the organisations was the focus of the new public sector managers. They are accountable on a greater scale to their boards, Housing Corporation, Audit Commission and customers in general. Their performance is monitored on a larger scale and accountability is vital. They need to demonstrate long-term viability and sound financial planning. With the government's Efficiency Agenda, organisations are in the necessary position of making gains via pooling their expertise and experiences. Public sector mangers are acutely aware that the government is eager to create a competition between organisations (especially for funding) therefore the gains via efficiency vehicles is essential. The government introduced Compulsory Competitive Tendering (CCT), Private Finance Initiatives (PFI) thus making cost cutting the imperative for public sector managers. They further increased the use of strategic models such as SWOT and PEST analysis, aligning the public sector more closely to the private sector at the strategic level. ...read more.

Conclusion

Private sector managers are painfully aware they are completely accountable to customers and ignore the fact that this has proved extremely costly to many companies. Providing structures to make public sector units solely accountable to customers remains the most important challenge for New Public Management. Within the public sector, synergy is more problematic to achieve than the private sector because conflicts between performance measures, stakeholders, cultural thinking and less managerial scope for risk taking mean conditions for closer customer orientation are difficult to accomplish. Uncertain, unclear and potentially changing long term goals by stakeholders make environmental conditions more turbulent and subject to sharp alterations within the public sector. Evaluation of success between the public and private sector remains deeply different. While private sector performances can be examined against measurable and comparable targets, such as profits, production or sales, this is not so simple in the public sector, with often conflicting performance indicators imposed. In such circumstances it is often more practical to manage for stability instead of managing for change. The elements are however becoming more aligned with the private sector. The growth of technology and fundamental sifts in culture have meant that the time lapse between private sector initiatives being taken up by the public sector have been reduced. Technology has also greatly helped the public sector to become more responsive and has a crucial part to play in delivering services more closely with customer wishes and demands. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. Edwin Chadwick and his success in public health

    This part of Chadwick's role in securing the necessary support for public health legislation was significant as it raised awareness of the problems, putting more pressure on the government to act. The real breakthrough was in 1848 the new Liberal government finally passed the Public Health Act, Chadwick was appointed

  2. Evaluate the development of social policy in the area of Housing

    Private enterprise built no more than 60,000 houses in any year from 1946 to 1951. The New Towns Act of 1946 was set up to develop corporations to build New Towns. Although Labour support for council housing has been traditionally stronger than that of the Tory's when they took power

  1. Is there justification for government intervention in the uk housing market and how has ...

    The Housing Policy states that forty per cent of those who go through the buying and selling process declare themselves dissatisfied with it. An efficient housing market benefits us all. Government is pursuing a range of measures to increase certainty in the process and reduce delays.

  2. The Health of the People: Public Health and Social Policy 1832-1875

    The Thames was really badly polluted, as factories on the riversides would let waste products flow into the river. The waste from the houses also went back to the Thames. In some towns however it was slightly different. Norwich for example had water supplies coming form its river but the were naturally sandy.

  1. What are the main options facing the government on taxation and public spending?Should expenditure ...

    Accordingly, changes to income tax affect some sections of the population more than others and do not affect those not paying tax. All income generated in the state should be liable to general taxation irrespective of the residency of the individual.

  2. Fascism, as a subject of historical inquiry in twentieth-century Britain, has heretofore been examined ...

    no nation can thrive without good and wise government. Parliament still governs Britain--or rather, Parliament attempts to do so, and failing, prevents her from being governed at all." The policies they outlined state clearly what they, and Mosley, believed to be the remedy for these ills: I. The initiation of legislation must be formally transferred to the executive. II.

  1. The Commons no longer acts as a constraint on the executive.' Critically evaluate this ...

    considering whether they actually hold any weight especially when confronted by the executive. In regard to the 'positive development' of pre-legislative scrutiny, it is worth noting that, "The decision as to whether or not a bill is to be subject to pre-legislative scrutiny is presently a matter for Government and

  2. Finance & Public Expenditure - A case study

    each territory, hospital services are using the 'age-weighted population' to determine the fund allocation for health service. (Smith, Rice and Carr-Hill, 2001: 237) This method does not reflect the actual expenditure for the health service in Scotland. In fact, it only creates a dilution with regard to the actual expenditure of its health service.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work