• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"There was no general drift to war in 1914 rather there was the determination of one power (Germany) to exploit the Balkan crisis to change the international status quo in its favour". Critically evaluate this statement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"There was no general drift to war in 1914 rather there was the determination of one power (Germany) to exploit the Balkan crisis to change the international status quo in its favour". Critically evaluate this statement. I agree completely with the above statement. This statement is accurate for a huge number of reasons. For example Germanys policy in the Balkans, and Germanys tactical alliance with Austria-Hungary. Once Germany felt the uneasiness in the feelings of Europe it used this uneasiness to its advantage. For a long time Germany waited in the wings so to speak for the chance to gain ground over Britain. When the Balkan crisis happened Germany viewed this as their chance to "change the international status quo in its favour". In Europe during the late eighteen hundreds, late nineteen hundreds there existed an alliance system. On one side you had a triple alliance of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy and on the other you had a triple entente of France, Russia and Britain. ...read more.

Middle

This is just one example of where Germany exploited the Balkan crisis in its own favour. The Young Turks policy of Ottomanization caused the Balkan states to come together and form what was known as the Balkan league. This league was formed in nineteen twelve and composed of Serbia, Bulgaria, Greece and Montenegro. The policy of Ottomanization meant the voluntary assumption by all the subjects of the empire, Moslems and Christians alike, of the full duties of citizenship coupled with a loyal support of the government. The Balkan war of nineteen twelve had the members of the Balkan league on one side and Turkey on another. It caused great and universal surprise because the world was not prepared for the quick and resounding victory won by the allies. Turkey fared badly at the Treaty of London because its size was reduced dramatically. All Ottoman territory was surrendered to the victorious allies. Bulgaria however was unhappy with the outcome of the Treaty of London and so as a result on June twenty ninth nineteen thirteen war was declared among the allies. ...read more.

Conclusion

Germany had always felt left out in colonial expansion. Germany felt that Britain and France were denying them their rightful share of colonial influence. They thought the Balkan crisis was their chance to increase their colonial influence without the help of Britain or France. Therefore Germany exploited the Balkan crisis in an effort to change the international status quo in its favour. Germany totally exploited the Balkan crisis to their advantage. They were determined to change the international status quo in its favour. They knew that by backing Austria during the crisis, they in turn would support Germany should a war start. Germany knew that backing Austria during the crisis would eventually lead to a European conflict and when Austria handed its ultimatum to Serbia, this conflict started. In a way Germany got what it wanted even though they weren't seen as being the ones who started the war. Germany knew that by backing Austria, it would mean that the already fragile lines of communication between Austria and Serbia would be irreconcilably damaged. This ensured that the international status quo was changed in Germanys favour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. Why Is the Middle East a Conflict Area?

    territory, with the Palestinian issue coming a poor second in terms of strategy and objectives. Finally, it was during this war that the Gulf States started to use oil prices and boycott as major weapons against the West. For the first time the West was made aware of the significant

  2. What caused the Financial Crisis: An in-depth study of Neoliberalism and the Lehman Brothers

    It is argued that these Acts were attempting to continue the works of the neoliberal ideas of Ronald Reagan, however Cassidy displays that the Acts were in fact both extremely counterproductive and not neoliberalist in intention (Cassidy 2009 p286). These Acts are counterproductive in the way that they have been

  1. Was the partition of Germany the main cause, or the main consequence of the ...

    Added to these shared minimum aims, the USSR desired reparations, uranium, security and technological and scientific expertise; while the USA and Britain desired control of resources from the Rhine and the Ruhr and secure a non- communist Western Europe. The maximum aim for the both the USSR and the USA

  2. 2nd Draft Dissertation - The invasion of Afghanistan, The Iraq conflict, and The dubious ...

    sufficiently covered by existing legal theories, but it is not for the United States to unilaterally amend international law. This new doctrine highlights a consistent approach by the United States to international law; international law will always apply to others but it will only bind the United States at its own free will.

  1. Critically evaluate post-war realist explanations of international politics with particular reference to power

    For example, Graham Allison's study shows how the decision-making approach alone cannot explain events in crisis management. Individual charisma, operational environments and bureaucracy are all played down and left out of realist analysis. The analysis of power as a property of unitary states is also problematised by analyses of the 1980 Iran hostage crisis.

  2. Conflict in Bosnia and Herzegovina

    (ibid: 27) Are there any "external" conflict parties? If so, what is their significance and what are their motivations? * The conflict in BiH had a clear international dimension as BiH is surrounded by the more powerful national states of 2 of the warring parties: Croatia and Serbia.

  1. The Factors That Resulted in the Outbreak of the First World War in 1914

    The war was just on the verge of breaking out. Austria-Hungary and Serbia The First World War actually began over a local war, launched by the Dual Monarchy of Austria-Hungary against Serbia. Then the local war immediately led to the confrontation between the two blocs.

  2. The power of citizenship is probably best known by those who are denied it. ...

    However this is a short sighted, reductionist argument. Looking to the surrounding nation of Jordan the lot of the refugee is much improved. The right of return can be maintained by the strengthening of a Palestinians identity. Political and public sectarian fears can be combated by the de-politicisation of the Palestinians and their integration in society.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work