This evaluation study will thoroughly study factors that influence teen pregnancy and parenting on the educational advancement of a girl child in Buea-Cameroon.

Authors Avatar by aliatta (student)

 

Problem statement

        The numerous technological advancements in the field of healthcare and social sciences are providing new and improved procedures to treat pregnant adolescents and teenage mothers; but still many of these patients are left wanting and disappointed from the educational and healthcare system. Both depression and low self-esteem have been linked to lower levels of educational advancements amongst these adolescents. This evaluation study will thoroughly study factors that influence teen pregnancy and parenting on the educational advancement of a girl child in Buea-Cameroon.

Background of the study

        In the past 3 decades, there has been an ever increasing interest in the link between lower educational advancements and teenage mothers and adolescents who get pregnant. Numerous studies have confirmed that the higher the levels of teenage pregnancy is directly linked to higher levels of educational abandonment (Aneshensel and Huba, 1983; Braucht et al., 1973; Kaminer, 1991; Kaplan et al., 1980; Kaplan et al., 1984; Kennedy et al., 1987; Paton et al., 1977; Reinherz et al., 1991; Robins and Przybeck, 1985; Shiffman and Wills, 1985; Simons et al., 1991). This level of consistency has led many researchers to believe that there is a definite and interdependent relation between the two amongst the youth (Blau et al., 1988; Kaplan et al., 1984; Reinherz et al., 1991; Simons et al., 1988).

        Research studies have studied social effects or influences, on educational abandonment by teenage mothers. Furthermore, studies have also looked at the impact of economic situation on educational advancements by teenage mothers. When taken into consideration, all these socio-economic dynamics and peripheral factors have been proved to be decisive in the relation between educational advancements by teenage mothers depression, low self-esteem and substance abuse (see Dembo et al., 1979; Paton and Kandel, 1978; Prendergast, 1974; Siegel and Ehrlich, 1989).  

Background on Depression

Paton and Kandel (1978), in their research included these socio-economic factors and concluded that the association between substance abuse and depression varied with the variation within and amongst culture and gender. In their study they failed to find a significant association between depression and substance abuse amongst the youth of the blacks as well as the Puerto Rican states. On the contrary they found a very strong association between the two factors when researching the white youngsters, and that too amongst the girls more then the boys.

        Siegel and Ehrlich (1989) in the study also concluded that there was a high amount of socioeconomic status (SES) differentiation between the adolescents who suffered depression due to substance abuse. If the SES and substance abuse was high amongst the white youngsters then they also exhibited a superior level of depression and dejection (The Children's Depression Inventory); whereas the opposite was true for those white youngsters who experienced lower SES and substance abuse levels. This study clearly shows that the social groupings and status play an integral part in the strength of the association between depression and substance abuse amongst the youngsters. Siegel and Ehrlich (1989) also in their study explain that the failure to provide sufficiently successful tactics to solve the substance abuse problems is the lack of understanding of the reasons to indulge in the activity across different cultures and ethnic groups. So in conclusion they asserted that the substance abuse or alcohol addiction is directly related to depression amongst the youngsters in the higher SES group but was not a significant relation amongst the youth in the lower SES group.  

        All the studies that have included the socio-economic factors in their analysis of the relation between depression and substance abuse have successfully found a strong relationship between multiple social and economic factors as strong mediators of depression, leading to substance abuse (Hager et al., 1971; Harris, 1971; Kaplan et al., 1984; Kaplan et al., 1980; Siegel and Ehrlich, 1989; Smart and Fejer, 1969). They have also successfully examined the corresponding variations and degrees of depression (Doerfler et al., 1988; Kaplan et al., 1980; Siegel and Ehrlich, 1989). However, few studies have synthesized the research studies on depression so as to give a holistic picture of teenage depression.  

Background on self-esteem

Harter (1990a) in his study explained that self-esteem was the basic instinct of an individual to approve, like, dislike or value his own qualities as a person. The two diverse philosophies presented by Harter (1990a, 1990b) on the concept of self-esteem were strongly supported by other researchers in their own studies particularly Rosenberg (1989). The first philosophy of self esteem brought forth by Harter was from William James. James defined self-esteem to be a direct relation of the success an individual has within a sphere and the priority that the individual attaches to the success achieved in that sphere. The other philosophy of self esteem brought forth by Harter was from C. Horton Cooley. Cooley defined self-esteem as the significance that an individual laid on the social view, especially of the significant others like family and friends, on the acceptance of his personality.  

        Self-esteem too as been thoroughly studied and its connections with substance abuse amongst teenagers have been widely reported. The vast extents of researches that have been done on the concept of self-esteem have included numerous factors over a period of time. Some of these factors are the level of apprehension, dejection, discontent, anger, isolation and petulance (Rosenberg, 1985). Blyth & Traeger (1988) in their study also found a direct influence of high or low self-esteem with the strength of association or closeness with the parents as well as superior academic achievements (O'Malley & Bachman, 1979). Other researchers have also found an encouraging view of the body image or level of self-appeal, domestic level and positioning of power as well as superior family revenues to be significant contributors to the level of self-esteem of an individual (Griffore, Kallen, Popovich, & Powell, 1990).  

The process of self-analysis begins at a very young age like early childhood years (see Bowlby, 1982; Harter, 1998) and then follows through consistently into the adolescent and teenage years (Block & Robins, 1993; Kling, Hyde, Showers, & Buswell, 1999; O'Malley & Bachman, 1983). Whatever priorities and decisions are made on what is important and what is not important to determine one�s self-worth are all dependent upon the numerous differing views and philosophies of self-esteem. For William James (1890), who is a founder of the self psychology, has defined self-esteem to be a structure based on the opinion an individual has on his/her own capabilities (see Higgins, 1991; Gecas & Shwalbe, 1983).

When considering the above definition, the actual decisive factor of one�s self-esteem is the association of the perceived capability and the level of success in its application. This factor of capability is what causes the inconsistencies and differences between the objectives, ideals, aims, principles, morals and feats of individuals.  The ideals of an individual mainly present the perception of what he/she believes he/she should be or should aim to be or wants to be. Most of these ideals of an individual are influenced by the expectations and targets of the parents during the early childhood years (Higgins, 1991; see also Harter, 1999).

Self-esteem, when defined as a weighing scale to measure the self-merit of an individual (e.g., Harter, 1998; Rosenberg, 1979) or as a self-analyzing process (e.g., Coopersmith, 1967; DuBois, Felner, Brand, Phillips, & Lease, 1996) has been overtime related to a numerous amount of modification and welfare factors. Some of these factors are academic feats or accomplishments (Keltikangas-Jarvinen, 1992), despair/melancholy/dejection (Hammond & Romney, 1995), communal contacts (Dekovic & Meeus, 1997), probability or likelihood of suicidal characteristics or desperation (Wichstrom, 2000), consumption syndromes (Willcox & Sattler, 1996), behavior syndromes (Watson, 1998), flexibility to unexpected or hectic happenings (Dumont & Provost, 1999), and drug or alcohol use (Scheier, Botvin, Griffin, & Diaz, 2000).

        Emler (2001) studied causes and effects of low self esteem. She synthesized research on self esteem and studied various factors by analyzing the allocation of the self-esteem ratios between and amongst different social groups like spiritual, socioeconomic, secular, familial structures, and varying interpersonal standpoints or choices. The results are not very good for individuals suffering from low self esteem. She found that lower levels of self esteem amongst adolescents, quite often, leads to substance abuse. Other studies too have confirmed these findings over the years.

Methodology

Data Collection

        The tactic involved in this process of collection of relevant data for the thesis will be that concise and yet comprehensive information related to the topic (Factors causing low self-esteem and depression) and will be compiled from articles published in various computerized databases of medical journals, (such as JAMA, Medline, Amed, Cinhal, Psycinfo) by individual researchers, as well as, research institutions. The aim of the literature review is to critically review the strengths and weaknesses of both conceptions and implementations of research pertinent to our topic.

Factors affecting low self-esteem and depression experiences are several, but only the most relevant ones will be discussed in this thesis so that the relevancy of the argument can be sustained throughout the paper. Therefore, this thesis will include only those studies wherein the main topic (1) was confirmed to be of low self-esteem, (2) was confirmed to be of depression, and/or (3) was confirmed to be of both low self-esteem and depression.

Data Evaluation

        Evaluation of the data will be based on calculating the intended affect or the outcomes/results of the study. The method used to measure the results of the study will be the same as those found in other research synthesis studies. We will also look into the process with which the results have been obtained so that limitations in the methods can be determined and improvements can be suggested. As stated in Weiss (Weiss, 1998), evaluation is the �systematic assessment of the operation and/or the outcomes of a program or policy, compared to a set of explicit or implicit standards, as a means of contributing to the improvement of the program or policy� (pg 4).

Causes of self esteem

        Self esteem is caused by a number of social and economic factors. This section of the paper provides a profound dimension of causes related to self esteem. The results of our research reveal a distinctive pattern of factors, which directly influence adolescent self esteem. These patterns have been illustrated in figure 1 below. The figure shows that self esteem is broadly influenced by:

(1) Cultural beliefs and body image;

(2) Level of anxiety;

(3) Levels of fear;

(4) Self-developed coping-strategies;

(5) Social settings;

(6) Family integrity;

(7) Parental behavior;

(8) Parental interaction;

(9) Peer and family relationships;

(10) Economic Issues;

(11) Emotional expression; and

(12) Ethnic identity.

We will describe each of these elements in the following sections.

 

The impact of cultural belief and body image on adolescent self esteem

        Blyth et al. (1985) characterized body image as a subjective occurrence rather than an objective one. Body image is formed by customs and mores about the desired physical appearances of both males and females emanating from the society. By applying this definition, one finds that self-esteem is directly proportional to the level of cultural standards an adolescent believes he/she has attained. Both Faludi (1992) and Wolf (1991) have found that girls are increasingly becoming victims of lower self-esteem as they are surrounded by ideal images of women who not only depict physical perfection by being thin, sexual and inactive; but also portray social and economic success. Several research studies have confirmed that female adolescents who are at the beginning of menses are more likely to develop lower self-esteem as they end gaining nearly one third of additional fat (Bartky, 1990; Petersen, 1988; Steiner-Adair, 1986; Thorbeke and Grotevant, 1982). Other studies have also confirmed that post-menses adolescent females are also highly likely to develop higher levels of self-esteem due to (1) biological changes occurring in their body and (2) the media representation of an ideal body image (Golombeck et al., 1987; Rierdan and Koff, 1985; Rierdan et al., 1989). Similarly, Kitzinger (1985) found that girls developed lower levels of self-esteem because they are constantly being told that they are imperfect regardless of how thin or beautiful they are. Davies and Furnham (1986) and Storz and Greene (1983) in their study found similar results and concluded that the strong link between lower self-esteem and body image should not surprise anyone.

        Other research studies have confirmed the connection between self-esteem and gender role identity (Hawkins et al., 1983; Jackson et al., 1986; Jackson et al. 1987). For instance, Jackson et al. (1987) found that gender role identity profoundly impacts self-esteem of girls particularly when girls undergo biological changes in their body and as a result transition from girlhood to maturity. Both, Bem (1981) and Petersen (1988) found that higher levels of low self esteem was found amongst girls who were not properly trained about female appearance and expectations and their role in the society.

        Several research studies also show that the relationship between body image and self-esteem is strongly influenced by the family of the adolescent and it can play a major role on gender identification (Gold and Yanof, 1985; Golombeck et al., 1987; Holmbeck and Bale, 1988; Isberg et al., 1989; Kamptner, 1988; LeCroy, 1988; Offer et al., 1982). For instance, Fisher (1986) found that female adolescents who had been given proper input about their roles and responsibilities in the society were less likely to develop lower levels of self-esteem and adolescent girls whose parents failed to give certain physical benchmarks with which girls could compare themselves with were found to be prone to higher levels of self-esteem.  

        In addition, several research studies have confirmed that the relationship between mothers and daughters has a significant impact on the link between gender role identity, body image and self-esteem (Kamptner, 1988; Leaper et al., 1989; Rubin, 1983; Offer et al., 1982; Striegel-Moore et al., 1986). For instance, Kamptner (1988) found that adolescent girls who found mothers to be as role models and source of wisdom were highly likely to develop higher levels of self-esteem than those girls who had weak relationship with their mothers. Similarly, Striegel-Moore et al. (1986) found that mothers, who consistently guided their adolescent girls on how to behave, think and feel and how they should physically appear, had a profound and positive impact on female self-esteem, their gender identity and body image.  

Jackson et al. (1986) found that the perception of a mother about her womanliness is directly proportional to her daughter�s perception of her womanliness (Jackson et al., 1986). Attie and Brooks-Gunn (1989) found that mothers have been responsible for the body image of an adolescent and also about his/her eating habits. However, conflicting views do exist and one researcher, Chernin (1986) points out, �the problem with female identity that most troubles us, and that is most disguised by our preoccupation with eating and body size and clothes, has a great deal to do with being a daughter and knowing that one's life as a woman must inevitably reflect upon the life of one's mother� (p. 37).

        Golub (1992) counterbalanced the findings of Chernin and reveals that adolescent girls are heavily inclined towards their mothers about their gender identity, body image and self-esteem (Golub, 1992). Both Hill and Holmbeck (1987) and Hill et al. (1985) found that teenagers pressurize parents for freedom and parents in turn are apprehensive about the result of their changing sexuality. In these changing circumstances, mothers play a key role for adolescent girls and fathers play a key role for adolescent boys. Strong family bonds and understanding from parents lead to higher self esteem and opposite is true for low self esteem (Hill and Holmbeck, 1987; Hill et al., 1985).

        In addition, Simmons and Rosenberg (1971) in their study determined that one of the features in the modernized American society that affects the self-esteem of the adolescents is perception of their personal input and successful/failing outcome that follows. This success/failure can take the form of school grades, financial situation of the family, the nature of their familial or social relations, etc (Simmons and Rosenberg, 1971). Turner (1960) in his study found the same result and concluded that the personal input of the adolescent to have a fruitful result in those genres shapes their self-esteem i.e. those adolescents have higher self-esteem if their input and ability lets them experience more success as opposed to those adolescents who experience failure (Turner, 1960).

        Crandall et al. (2001) in their research found that even though self-esteem was a very personal and individual factor, it was at times, this importance in individualism that affected it negatively. They also asserted that self-esteem of the overweight adolescents is most likely to be affected by the stress in individualism (Crandall et al., 2001; Crystal et al., 2000). Thompson and Stice (2001) in their study focused on the effect of the promotion of the ideal body image on the self-esteem of adolescents. Young girls were stressed on getting the body image that was promoted as successful in the electronic and print media i.e. extremely thin waists and tall heights. The boys� image of the ideal body, even though, could not be perceived as dangerous as the girls; they were still expected to have muscular yet sporty outlooks with really thin waists. Those adolescents who achieved the ideal body image to the highest possible extent were observed to have higher self-esteem ratios as opposed to those who were overweight (Thompson and Stice, 2001).

        Quinn and Crocker (1999) in their study linked personal input and individualism and the aftermath on self-esteem rates of the adolescents in the USA. They concluded that the success or failure to attain the perfect of ideal body image was directly related by the adolescents to their personal inputs (Pierce and Wardle, 1997; Quinn and Crocker, 1999). The adolescents who failed to attain the ideal body had lower self-esteem and regarded themselves as spiritless or deficient in abilities that were needed to achieve success in their spheres of interest (Crystal et al., 1997; Quinn and Crocker, 1999). Bell and Morgan (2000) in their study asserted that the self-esteem was likely to have lower levels as long as the ideal body image was promoted. They also went on to say that the social relations and the perception of success were also more likely to be tainted by the promotion of the ideal body image (Bell and Morgan, 2000).

        Numerous researches have also shown that adolescents who are in the ethnic minorities, in wheelchairs, are amputated, and have facial disfigurements do not face as much social criticism as those that are overweight and hence have higher self-esteems (e.g., Bell and Morgan, 2000; e.g., Crocker et al., 1993; Lerner and Korn, 1972; Staffieri, 1967; Weiner et al., 1988; Wing and Jeffrey, 1999). Crandall (1994) explains that this is so because society perceives the overweight problem to be solvable with higher motivations and personal inputs. This is why the overweight adolescents have been reported to have the lowest self-esteems (Crandall, 1994; Crandall and Biernat, 1990; Weiner et al., 1988).

        Another way that the self-esteem of an (overweight) individual can be affected is through the social identity (Tajfel, 1982; Tajfel and Turner, 1979). Social identity is the ability of a social or ethnic grouping might have to rate itself higher then other factions (overweight people) in the society. The members of both the factions will face the consequences of belonging to that group and the faction that is successful in promoting the belief that they are superior will record higher self-esteem rates amongst its members. The basic characteristics of both groups may be similar but if the perception of one faction is more acceptable then its members will automatically feel more confident because of their association and experience high levels of self-esteem (Hewstone et al., 1982, 1993; Pettigrew, 1979; Simon and Brown, 1987; Klaczynski, 2000; Klaczynski and Aneja, 2002). One of the basic reasons for the people to join these popular groups or make an effort to make their group more popular is to attain a constructive social standing. Research shows that most individuals in the popular group feel that social acceptance helps their confidence and self-esteem levels (Klaczynski, 2000; Klaczynski and Aneja, 2002).  

        There are numerous ways that a group can promote itself to a higher status and popularity. Hewstone et al. (1982) found that one of these ways is to advertise or market the group in a more creative and constructive manner than any of the other groups. However this also means that the popularity of the views of one group could dampen and wipe out the views of another group. This basically results in the deprecation of the groups who do not share the same ideals and viewpoints of the popular group. This overall affects the overweight adolescents negatively as well, as they tend to relate their own self-esteem in accordance to the critical outlooks that they get from the normal-weighted adolescents (Hewstone et al., 1982; Tajfel and Turner, 1981).  

        Klaczynski and Aneja (2002) in their study summarize the three main social hindrances to higher self-esteem levels amongst adolescents:

1.        First, the self-esteem of the popular groups and their promotion of the ideal body image;

2.        Second, the self-esteem concerns in relation to the unconstructive mannerisms and belief behind overweighing problems. In other words, the belief that obesity can be overcome by higher personal input and it is only the lack of this input that results in the lasting of obesity; and,

3.        Third, the unconstructive and uncreative advertising of the overweight and obese adolescents. In other words, obese adolescents tend to rub off their self-esteem from the confidence and attitude of the non-obese adolescents.  

Klaczynski and Aneja (2002) point out that there are, however, exceptions where the adolescents tend to rely on their own individualistic beliefs behind the ideal body image phenomenon and the image of the obese adolescents. Even though the �to be thin, is to be in� philosophy is an omnipresent acceptance in the Western societies, there are still those adolescents and social groups that tend to not adhere to it.

This individualism and break from the popular social beliefs promotes the arbitrary conclusion that the thought process determining that self-esteem issues were linked to the unconstructive outlooks of the overweight people and their lack of personal input or self control to overcome their weight problems was correct. Also, the idea that the promotion of the ideal body image is a factor in the belief that personal input can solve obesity problems should not have a discarding effect on the prior societal beliefs towards the self-esteem/unconstructive outlooks toward obesity (Klaczynski and Aneja 2002).

        Goold et al. (2004) found that one of the most successful and damaging effects that the social beliefs have had perhaps is the personal input phenomenon. This phenomenon is not only popular in societies but is also projected widely in the media which advertises how some people can actually control their weight. This guides the adolescents to believe that obesity is a mater of personal input more then anything else while the truth of the matter is that there are numerous other factors involved.  

Once the adolescents believe that personal input is the answer and yet fail to decrease their weight with rigorous dieting or exercise, then their self-esteem and confidence is bound to decrease. But it has to be remembered that the phenomenon of self-esteem is not affected by a single factor but there are many other elements that contribute to its varying levels. The researchers over time have asserted that the self-esteem of the overweight individual with their failures to personally control their weight should only affect them in a way that they depreciate those who experience obesity and hence create their own philosophies of the ideal body image or skinniness (Goold 2004).

If the adolescents feel that they have no self-control and their personal input is not enough then they might degrade themselves through:

(a)        Believing that they are amongst the shamed and degraded groups of society and there is very little they can do to get out of that position, and

(b)        Through building an unnaturally high asking level of themselves which they might not have the strength, will power or ability among other things to actually achieve.  

Furthermore, Miller and Downey (1999) in their study analyzed and asserted that the association between the negative outlook of obesity and self esteem does subsist but is influenced by numerous other factors like (Miller and Downey, 1999) customs, SES, age and gender. After careful assessments Goold (2004) found the same results despite the fact there have been many unconstructive associations and links found between the weight and self-esteem issues amongst the adolescents.

        When assessing the American adolescents, many researchers found substantial and authentic evidence that showed that the self-esteem and body weight issues were obviously connected (Mendelson et al., 1996). Harter (1985, 1993), as well as, Mendelson et al. (1996) in their studies have highlighted the fact that the worldwide image or perception of self-esteem is mostly driven by the self-esteem promotion in micro spheres. In other words, if some spheres are treated as more significant to the constructive self-esteems, than these spheres will also eventually come to dominate the self-esteem levels on a global scale.         

To conclude, we have already discussed some of the reasons why people might regard obesity in such a negative way in the western society. We have also discussed how this can take its toll on the self-esteem of the obese adolescents. It is through the aforementioned conclusions that we can assume that the ideal body image and the degradation of the overweight adolescents has a huge part to play in the association of self-control over ones� weight and self esteem (Goold 2004).  

The impact of anxiety on adolescent self-esteem

        Byrne (2000) in his study found strong links between anxiety and low self esteem amongst adolescents. He founded his study on two theories, namely (1) classical turmoil theory and (2) normality theory (Byrne, 2000). Collins (1991) in his study found that these two theories have dominated most of the subject of study on the adolescents and their behaviors. The turmoil theory mainly concentrates on the psychodynamics of the adolescents, like issues of sexuality and personal characteristics. The normality theory tends to take the limelight away from factors like chaos, variances and disagreement. He points out that most researches that have been done in the past decade on the adolescents have concentrated on two facets: (1) psychobiological (2) psychosocial domains (Collins, 1991). Byrne (2000) concluded that both these domains have a profound impact on adolescent self esteem.

Similarly, Dusek (1987) in his study presented two examples that describe the aftermath of the biological growth amongst adolescents. These two examples or ideals are the mediated-effects ideal and the direct-effects ideals. The mediated-effects ideal tends to rely on a very extensive spectrum that is accountable for the psychological growth that encompasses the personal, traditional, intellectual and communal elements. While the direct-effects ideal presents a direct association between the physiological alterations and psychological growth. Byrne (2000) used Dusek�s findings to assess the self esteem of adolescents and found that mediated-effects model impacted self esteem of adolescents, particularly for girls. He failed to find any connection between direct-effects ideals and adolescent self-esteem.

        Phillips (1978) points out adolescents who have higher anxiety levels tend to get more involved in problematic situations and raise serious mannerism concerns, they tend to be unpopular and ostracized by their contemporaries, have inferior levels of the self esteem, and their grades and academic attitudes suffers a lot more as opposed to those adolescents who are less anxious (Phillips, 1978). Johnson (1979) found that there are between 10% and 30% of schoolchildren whose academic achievements are hampered by the increased levels of anxiety. He also found that adolescents who have lower degrees of anxiety be more alert and experience higher academic presentations and achievements and are more likely to have higher levels of self esteem (Johnson, 1979).

        Another aspect of the research that has been covered with adolescents serving as the sample has been the joint melancholic effect of the anxiety syndromes and the peripheral syndromes. Most of these studies have highlighted the augmented and joint hazardous elements and their practical implications (Zoccolillo, 1992). Russo and Beidel (1994) in their study found that confidence and behavioral issues amongst adolescents is still one of the many topics that engage researchers. The statistics that show the degree to which the peripheral mannerisms are linked or cause by anxiety range from a meager 2% to 21%. This stat however is not accurate if both the infants and adolescents are taken into consideration (Russo & Beidel, 1994). McGee et al. (1990) conducted a longitudinal study that showed that the existence of the joint melancholic effect of the anxiety syndromes and the peripheral syndromes does decline from the infantry age to the adolescence/youthful ages. This could also be a result of the reduction in anxiety with the increase in age (McGee et al, 1990). Byrne (2000) in his study also found the same results and concluded that adolescents seem to overcome self esteem issues and experience lower levels of anxiety as they grow from childhood to adulthood (Byrne, 2000).

The impact of fear on adolescent self-esteem

        Fear in normal terms is described as a perceived or accepted response to a possible or imaginary danger to threat. However, this definition does not apply when we are considering the scientific form of fear or phobia (Gullone & King, 1993). Ollendick, King, and Frary (1989) in their study concluded that fear was more dominant amongst the infants and preadolescents as opposed to the adolescents. However, they could not verify and authenticate this conclusion in a later study (Ollendick, Yule, & Oilier, 1991). Byrne (2000) in his study found that female adolescents tend to have higher levels of fear than male adolescents. He found that those adolescents who experienced higher levels of fear were also prone to higher levels of low self esteem (Byrne, 2000).    

        Taylor (1993) found that some of the more common fearful responses include the phenomena of panic attacks and terrors. The three common elements that cause these responses are:  

(a)        Dread of unconstructive assessment,

(b)        Anxiety sensitivity, and

(c)        Grievance/disease sensitivity (Taylor, 1993).

Of these elements, Byrne (2000) found anxiety sensitivity to be directly linked to lower levels of self esteem. Anxiety sensitivity mainly comprises symptoms of anxiety leading to fear due to a certain belief that anxiety has dangerous somatic, psychological, or social penalties. Reiss (1991) in his study asserted that the basic forms of fears were the playing field for a broad spectrum of fear-stimuli and Byrne (2000) found that these basic forms of fear led to heightened levels of low self esteem amongst adolescents.

Taylor (1993) while conducting his study found facts that verified Reiss's (1991) philosophy that the dread of feeling anxious was more powerful then other fears. Nevertheless, Taylor (1993) also stated that these basic fears were not the basis for all of the inconsistencies that were found in the ordinary fears and quality/character anxiety. This basically denoted that there were other unenthusiastic life incidents that could contribute to the aftermath of these basic fears. Hence, the stats that analyze the association between the basic fears and unenthusiastic life incidents could be utilized to analyze and foresee the occurrence as well as the extent of ordinary fears. Other elements that may influence fear are age, gender, and SES among others. Byrne (2000) found age and gender to be strong indicators of lower self esteem amongst adolescents.

        King, Gullone, and Ollendick (1992) in their research on the anxiety-fear association studied children between the ages of 8 and 16. They concluded that the pattern of anxiety and fear was the same as found in the adolescents. This basically meant that higher anxiety levels led to higher fear levels and lower self esteem, with the opposite being true as well.

        Fear, in terms of panic attacks, amongst infants and adolescents has only in the past decade or so caught the attention of the researchers. Nelles and Barlow (1988), however, had an opposing view of panic attack patterns amongst the infants. Last and Strauss (1989) and Alessi, Robbins, and Disaver (1987) were other researchers who supported and verified the views presented by Nelles and Barlow (1988). These studies showed that most panic attacks began at the age of adolescence, not before, and were more common for the females. Byrne (2000) found that these females were highly prone to lower levels of self esteem

There have many studies done on the American adolescents and the incidence of the impulsive panic attacks amongst them. Most of the results showed that nearly 60% of the adolescents had panic attacks and they were more common amongst females then the males (Hayward, Killen, & Taylor, 1989; Macaulay & Kleinknecht, 1989; Warren & Zgourides, 1988). Other researches also showed statistics that confirmed that adolescents suffered from higher levels of panic attacks and hence they were more likely to have increased degrees of anxiety and lower self esteem (King, Gullone, Tonge, & Ollendick, 1993).

The impact of self-developed coping-strategies on adolescent self-esteem

        Collins (1991) found that the phase of turning from an adolescent to a youngster is the phase where the identity crises occur for most children (Collins, 1991). Furthermore, it is during this transition that the adolescent starts to deal on a larger scale with the psychosocial realities and starts to develop his tackling or coping capabilities and tactics. Compas (1987) found that this coping procedure or phase is very under researched and rarely comprehended (Compas, 1987). Frydenberg and Lewis (1994), in their study explained that this was because the adolescents had a whole structure of coping tactics and none of those tactics were used in frequency or regular consistencies. Another unknown area about the coping tactics is whether they are part of the overall characteristics or whether they have been observed before being practiced. Some of the elements that influence the coping tactics are gender, society, customs, maturity, family structure and family conditions among others. Byrne (2000) found that adolescents who were able to execute successful coping strategies were highly likely to experience higher levels of self esteem. He found the opposite to be true for those adolescents who failed to practice a coping strategy (Byrne, 2000).

The impact of social settings on adolescent self esteem

        According to Bronfenbrenner (1989) the social system is basically a personality or character structure (Bronfenbrenner, 1989). So when considering this system, self-esteem of adolescents gets influenced by biological, personal as well as social elements like the family, contemporaries, and social institutions. All these elements can influence the self-esteem directly through joint contacts and/or personal dedication of the adolescent. Kohn (1989) found that exo-systems - external social settings � can also at times influence the self-esteem of adolescents. One of the examples of exo-systems is the occupational choices of the parents, these occupational choices will structure the overall parenting approach as well as the familial norms, principles and habits, which as a result will influence the path of the adolescent�s mental growth (Kohn, 1989). The exo-system can also influence the child�s mental growth outside of the domain of the parental attitudes. Children can analyze the future contributions that they can make by analyzing the social structure that exists outside of their family like the gender differentiations within the social sphere. Orr and Dinur (1995) found that occupational choices made by parents and social structures surrounding the adolescents significantly impact their self esteem (Dinur and Orr, 1995).

        Within the domain of social settings, self-esteem has been defined by the socialists as a way to determine and calculate the value that an individual places on himself. This definition has been pretty accurate through the years and has been found to effectual associations with elements like associated execution (Markus, 1977), manner alteration (Eccles et al., 1984; Epstein, 1973; Sullivan, 1953), social participation (Rosenberg, 1991), academic accomplishments (Assor and Connell, 1991; Marsh, 1990a), and emotive welfare (Bandura, 1978; Dweck and Elliot, 1983).

There is very little disagreement on the fact that personal growth of an individual is affected by his self-esteem. The differences arrive in how this affect is represented and what is the background behind the conclusions made. The social scientists tend to rely on the phenomena of personality (Rosenberg, 1991), self-assessment (Harter, 1983), self-respect (Wylie, 1968), self-conception, self-esteem (Marsh, 1990a) as well as, confidence or self-worth (Harter, 1983). There are numerous researches as well where self-esteem is calculated on a global free-of-ideals structure (e.g., Rosenberg, 1991), with the help of the specific calculative stats of spheres (e.g., Piers and Harris, 1969), and additional calculative stats of other realms (e.g., Marsh, 1990a; Harter, 1983, and Wylie, 1979).

        The pattern of these studies exhibits two facts:

1.        The degree of self-evaluations, i.e., the different collection of the various definitions and elements of self-concept, and

2.        The structure of the self-concept philosophy, i.e., the system of associations and link between the different elements especially between elements of self-concept and self-esteem.

This stack of facts and stats gives the researcher the opportunity to analyze and form conclusions about the numerous detached and widespread influences that the social environments have on an adolescent�s self esteem. Dinur and Orr (1995) found that the structure of the self-concept theory helps the individual to use these facts to his advantage so that he/she can cope and tackle with the situations on a general scale. If the development of an individual is dependent upon the association of the self-concept and self-esteem then it safe to say the self-concept of parents, or peers, or other social factors will have a strong influence on the adolescents� development (Dinur and Orr, 1995).

        Harter (1983) found that the theory of self-concept varies with the ages, cultures and populations, and this variation is one of the propelling forces for many researchers to study the multifaceted nature of the self-concept (Harter, 1983; Marsh, 1990a). Dinur and Orr (1995) argued that these studies lack the social environment or changes that effect the formation of the self-concept. Also not many studies have been conducted implementing the multifaceted nature of the self-concept on the choices and communication of the adolescent with his/her environment. The researches done thus far have concentrated on the gender preferences amongst different societies and have only exhibit the association of certain social environments with specific ideals of the self-concept philosophies.

        Rosenberg and Pearlin (1978) in their study tried to classify some of the main components that make up the structure of the self-concept philosophy. They classified the opinion of significant others like family members or friends as an integral component along with all the facts that were collected (by the adolescents) from self-evaluation, recognition and acknowledgment of what is vital or important and assessments of their social relationships. They also explained that when these classifications are expanded then one can see how they are influenced by the peripheral third parties or testimonial factions within the social setup. Empirical studies of relations between social setting and self-concept variables reported discrete contingencies.

        In relation to the self-concept phenomenon, numerous researches have also carried out studies with the focus being on the different gender preferences in different social environments; and interestingly, all of the researches done, on the two factors, show unforeseen links or happenings in their association. A large number of the studies done in the western societies have shown that the female adolescents are the ones that experience higher levels of low self-esteem then males and they also explain how this is more common within specific cultures and/or realms within a society (Cheung, 1986; Davis et al., 1978; Demo and Parker, 1987; Orr and Ben-Eliahu, 1993; Robinson-Awana et al., 1986; Rosenberg, 1985; Skaalvik, 1986). Numerous studies have reached somewhat of a consensus on the social influence of the above facts but there have not been many researches that highlight the social environmental elements that that have an influence on the gender preferences in the self-concept.

        Leung, Salili, and Baber (1986), in one of their studies concluded that there was an interdependent connection between the forms and amount of authority, the self-esteem of the adolescents', the ambience of the family intellect, and the ordinary adolescent concerns. Most adolescents felt apprehensive to perform with an appropriate social mannerism and if they were unable to do so then they would self-evaluate themselves and present traits of lower self-esteem. The authority and influence of peripheral factors would hinder them asking for help from family members; disregard whatever help the family members did give; not take active part in the designing and organizing of the family events; and express emotions of anger and irritability when things were not done according to their liking.

De Man and De-Visse (1987), in their study, asserted that social isolation was directly associated with lower levels of self-esteem and authority/influence of peripheral factors. Rosenberg, Schooler, and Schoenbach (1989), in their study concluded that the adolescents with higher level of self-esteem were good academic achievers, happy, and avoided truancy, negligence or misbehavior. In his study, after considering self-esteem in relation to numerous otter elements, he also concluded that:

1.        Low self-esteem amongst the economically strained groups leads to negligence, criminal behavior and misbehavior,

2.        Self-esteem and melancholy have a two-way and interdependent association.

Studies have shown that the effect parenting on the self-esteem of the adolescent is very significant. Parents, who show fair disciplinary methods, are fostering and cooperative have children who have higher levels of self-esteem. According to Baumrind (1971) the opposite also stands true (Baumrind, 1971; Marcia, 1980; Maccoby & Martin, 1983). Plus, studies have also shown how negatively the economic strains and crisis affects the adolescents� self-esteem. The economic strain can lead to parent-child detachment as well marital unhappiness or split as proved in numerous researches. This marital unhappiness leads for higher levels of distress, misbehavior, lesser social interactions, early alcohol use and depression in the adolescent hence affecting his self-esteem extremely dangerously as concluded in the study conducted by Forehand et al. (1991) and Conger et al. (1991).

The impact of family integrity on adolescent self esteem

        Mruk (1999) found that the role of the parents is very well defined within the realm of self-concept. It is believed that if and when the parents create a friendly yet strict and loving environment for the adolescents, then the adolescent will experience higher levels of constructive growth and will attain superior mental strength (Mruk, 1999). Also another important factor for the shaping of the self-esteem of the adolescents is their peer affiliations. Those adolescents who have lower self-esteem are usually reported to be associated with distracting peers who are of very little help in the recognition of identities and tasks when it comes to school grades, sports, extra-curricular activities, engagement in harmful habits like alcohol or drugs, etc (Kaplan, 1980; Patterson et al., 1992).

        Usually the studies that were conducted to examine how the unconstructive family structure influences low self-esteem used the questionnaire or survey method and ask the children to rate their family lives consisting on certain standard conditions like employment, peace, economic issues, etc. Some of the studies conducted this ways were the research done by Miller et al. (1986) where he concentrated on the nature of the parental management or power and adolescent sexual activities; Quintana & Lapsley (1990) carried out a research that mainly highlighted the numerous ways a parent-child clash and familial troubles of separation, divorce, death etc. affected the adolescents� growth; Holmbeck & Wandrei (1993) conducted a study which focused on the adolescent-parent association and how this association shifted or altered with the growth of the child; Martin et al. (1995) conducted yet another study where he focused on the adolescent reactions responses to suicidal capacities or instants within their families; and McCullough & Scherman (1998) also conducted a study where they focused on the general communication between the child and the parent (or lack of it) and its impact on adolescent self esteem. All of these studies show that negative family structures increase lower levels of self esteem amongst adolescents.

        The studies that include both the parents and children�s responses are very limited. This is simply because there are apparent organizational hurdles when conducting a survey from both the child and the parent in the same family. This is a disadvantage because if studies like this were conducted more efficiently and conclusively then the numerous adolescent conflict or confidence problems could be anticipated and rectified (Crespi & Sabatelli, 1993; Coco & Courtney, 1998). There is only one major study of Hong Kong adolescents conducted by Shek (1999) that exhibits that the emotional distress and lower levels of self esteem experienced by the adolescent could actually be a result of the clashes between the parent and the child with both playing different and equivalent parts (Shek, 1999). One of the major reasons for these clashes is the maturing of the adolescent and the interaction that the adolescent had in his/her social circle. This maturity and experience along with the age gap resulted in the formation of conflicting principles and values between the child and the parent which resulted in discrepancies and disagreements (Shek, 1999). Hampson et al. (1994) said that the clashes and disagreements between the child and the parent were bound to increase with the increase in the age, hence maturity, of the adolescent. These clashes could also be based on how the parent views the family life should be and how much this view differs from the child�s and vice versa.

        Both Kagitcibasi (1990) and Lay et al. (1998) found that family integrity for most adolescents and youngsters is an integral component of the social status. Its importance grows when the children experience cross-cultural or foreign social experiences as well (Kagitcibasi, 1990; Lay et al., 1998). They found that all forms of positives and constructive family integrity are believed to lead to higher self-esteem and confidence amongst the adolescents.

The impact of parental behavior on adolescent self esteem

        Numerous researches have shown enough authentic links between the adolescent self-esteem and parent personalities. All of the studies tend to agree with the fact that higher levels of self-esteem are evident when the parents are helpful and loving towards their children (Gecas, 1971, 1972; Growe, 1980; Graybill, 1978; Hoelter & Harper, 1987; Holmbeck & Hill, 1986; Kawash et al., 1985; Litovsky & Dusek, 1985; Peterson, Southworth, & Peters, 1983). To extend this, numerous studies have also shown that if the parents are able to manage the habits and behaviors of children while staying away from the negative emotions like apprehension, culpability, blame and alienation then the children or adolescents are more likely to have higher self-esteem and have a healthy relationship with their parents; and children will feel of sense of pride through being, not doing i.e. realize that who they are is important (Graybill, 1978; Kawash et al., 1985; Litovsky & Dusek, 1985; Openshaw et al., 1984).

Join now!

For most of the adolescents, a strong form of self-esteem can be highly increased through parental assistance, appreciation, cooperation as well as family integrity and peace (Harter, 1999). This has been proved to be true for most cultures, those who are in the majority and the minority, in both the western and eastern nations (e.g., Herz and Gullone, 1999; Scott et al., 1991; Shek, 1999; e.g., Greenberger and Chen, 1996; Hughes and Demo, 1989). Apart from parental or familial participation, the social circle and acquaintances are also very significant influences in the build-up of higher levels of self-esteem amongst ...

This is a preview of the whole essay