that women’s role in society must belong within a child-rearing and nursing capacity
(Basow, 1992) and not a business-minded vocation.
The occupational segregation has been viewed as one of the main reasons for the
gender pay gap (House of Common, 2005). The gender pay gap has been defined as
the differences between women's and men's average earnings (weekly full-time
equivalent). Despite the introduction of the 1970 Equal Pay Act, women still earn
around 15-18 percent less than men in full-time employment and between 37-40 per
cent of part-time employment (ONS, 2013). The Fawcett Society, an organisation
which contemporarily fights for women’s equality, had found that as a consequence
of such pay structures women now in fact work “free from November” (The
Guardian, 2016). This is cause for concern as three months worth of income for
anyone regardless of gender is huge, it is evident that some form of subtle
discrimination is taking place as women’s work is devalued severely. However many
contend that due to lifestyles and influences have in their life (childbirth, childcare,
elderly care) women prefer to take time out from work which the statistics do not take
into account (Halbert and Inguli, 2014).
Candidate No. 229695
Overall, women can expect to earn significantly less than men over their entire
careers as a result of differences in caring responsibilities, clustering in low skilled
and low paid work, the qualifications and skills women acquire, and outright
discrimination.
Women, as a result, start to lose ambition and become engrossed and constrained into
these feminised low paid-positions due to becoming convinced that they do not
acquire the masculine characteristics needed to become an ‘effective leader’ (Cann
and Siegfried, 1990; Oakley, 2000). To become the ‘successful businesswoman’
women must lose their feminine characteristics and womanhood.
Status and expectations
Employees are expected to manage and adhere their emotions, physicality and attire
to fit the organisations brand and identity. There are two main processes in which this
is conducted: emotional labour and aesthetic labour.
Emotional labour is characterised by the ways in which employers manipulate and
routinise workers by commercialising their emotions by “inducing or suppressing
feelings in order to sustain the outward countenance that produces the proper state of
mind… a coordination of mind and feeling”, (Hochschild, 1983:7). Hochschild
(1983) uses the examples of the overly-zealous, smiling flight attendant against the
stern, deflating bill collector as a means of projecting the polar opposite ways in
which feelings are managed. The sets of feeling attached to each role are different due
to the expectation of the job; the flight attendant must enhance the customers status
above their own as they “are never wrong” (Hochschild, 1983:139).Whereas the bill
collector uses “anti-apathetic” or “negative” emotions (Rafaeli and Sutton, 1989;
Korczynski. 2003) in the form of demoralising customers to retrieve payment.
Candidate No. 229695
Hochschild (1983) uses the examples of the friendly, smiling flight attendant against
the stern, deflating bill collector as a way projecting the strikingly polar opposite
ways in feelings are managed. Hochschild (1983) states that the employee’s feelings
and emotions are given to them at work, meaning that they lose all senses of their
identity, as the employer has purchased them for use in the creation of profit. This
once again links in with Marx’s theory of alienation; the worker essentially sells their
commodity for money. Subsequently, they use their wages to purchase commodities
which are necessary for survival in society, as a result, they have no money left and
restart this procedure again hence become puppets in capitalism (Churchich, 1990;
Bratton, Denham and Deutschmann, 2009).
Aesthetic labour refers to the commodification of employees’ face, voices and
appearance into interactive work, where employees bodies become “valorised and
converted into economic capital for the organisation (Witz, Warhurst and Nickson,
2003:40-41). Aesthetic labour is crucial to consumer capitalism, in general, this
applies to women in the labour market, more predominantly front-line retail workers.
Retailers subtlety discriminate against workers whose appearance is not “slim, toned,
youthful and blemish free” (Fineman, 2011:71) which projects what a “woman ought
to look like” (Fireman, 2011:71). Similarly, the physical appearance of flight
attendants is scrutinised and discriminated against as only female hostesses must
manage and monitor their bodies as they are subject periodic weigh-ins in which they
will be disciplined for not maintaining the ‘companies’ body. Heyes (2006) uses the
Foucauldian notion of self-surveillance to discuss this further as the worker would
attempt to construct and nurture a new ‘self’ by forms of dieting and exercising to
conform to the companies guidelines
Similarly, aesthetic labour also takes place in male-dominated roles such as; bouncers
and bill collectors. Bouncers are employed by their traditional hegemonic masculine
traits, such as physicality and violence, and is commodified for nightlife culture as a
means for protection (Hobbs, Hadfield, Lister and Widow, 2002). The ability for man
Candidate No. 229695
to project a forceful, masculine identity is utilised performatively due to the
assumption that big men are hard men (Winlow, Hobbs, Hadfield, and Lister, 2001).
Aspects of their appearance such as height, weight, the muscle become surveilled by
fellow night workers and clubs as they assess whether or not the bouncer is
competent to regulate disruptive customers. If the bouncer to lacking in one of the
mentioned aspects, their masculinity would be ridiculed and stigmatised (Monaghan,
2002). Hence a further male hierarchy, which excludes and includes, is constructed
within men in service work. Bouncers who are deemed as tall and muscular are
classed as the ‘superordinate' whereas ‘retail security guards’ who have non-imposing
bodies (less physicality) are seen as the subordinate “muppets” (Connell, 1995;
Monaghan, 2002).
More recently, however, workers are pitted against both emotional and aesthetic
simultaneously, from my experience working in retail at Next PLC. Retail workers
are increasingly becoming overly policed and surveillance by the company with the
use of ‘mystery shoppers’. Mystery shoppers, sent by management, disguise
themselves as ordinary customers who assess and scrutinise workers in relation to a
check list. Employees are personally assessed on a never-ending checklist in which
they ‘must’ meet, e.g. smart attire is worn, personal hygiene and appearance are
satisfactory, wide product knowledge are good (Cook, 2002; Wasson, 2012). From a
personal experience if workers fail to meet the criteria they face losing their month’s
bonus (along with all the retail workers) and are apprehended by management who
‘record card’ workers (formal disciplinary).
Research also suggests that not only do aesthetic and emotional labour combine,
flight attendants now also have to suffer the wrath of an additional third form of
labour, “sexually-commodified labour” (Hochschild, 1983; Tyler and Abbott, 1998).
Flight attendants are expected to assume the role of “part mother, part servant, part
tart” (Tyler and Abbott, 1998:440), in which they attend to the sexual desires of men.
Women and flying in the air become part of a sexualised ‘fantasy’ for men
Candidate No. 229695
(Hochschild, 1983:93-4) flight attendants unwillingly must take part in this
sexualised role-play or face the paying customer complaining. This reinforces the
subordinate, societal position women are in, women lose all sources of freedom and
rights to men who use capitalism as a means of controlling women.
Harassment: form of ‘control.'
Harassment in the workplace is the final form of ‘patriarchal control’ in this
discussion; there are two main forms this occurs in, management environment and
customer service environment.
When management is involved this tends to be of a sexual nature, where “unwanted
imposition of sexual requirements in the context of a relationship of unequal
power” (MacKinnon, 1979:1). This form of discrimination takes place when women
enter non-traditional places of employment. Along with their minority status which
they hold, these women become “greatly visible, polarised and isolated, highlighting
the incongruity between sex role and work role leading to harassment” (Herring and
Henderson, 2014:85). This is evident in Collinson and Collinson’s study (1996) as
they examine the sexual harassment experiences of women 'life assurance sales
managers' against their immediate boss, ironically named “Dick”. Jenny had been
subject to sexual advances both in a professional and non-professional field, where
Dick routinely would unzip his trousers insinuating sexual intercourse and that she
did not know “what she was missing” (Collinson and Collinson, 1996:34).
Sheila, another manager, had accepted sexual harassment as part of her daily routine
and did not feel the need to report Dick’s sexual advancements. Instead, she would
manage her feelings and retain control of the situation by laughing at the situation
and make it into ‘locker room’ banter with the other male workers (Collinson and
Collinson, 1996:36). Both Jenny and Sheila had taken polar opposite methods in
Candidate No. 229695
dealing with sexual harassment, namely ‘resistance’ and ‘integration’. Sheila, in fact,
had made a mindful effort to distance herself away from Jenny which for her was a
career move, as she did not wish to be associated with her. What is interesting here is
that Dick had gone to further lengths with Sheila than he had with Jenny, which had
positioned Sheila in a more vulnerable light as he had proved to “get away with
it” (Collinson and Collinson, 1996:38).
Women, just like Jenny, feel the backlash of accusing men of sexual advances as
management continuously dismiss any complaints as pure whingeing by a
“complaining feminist” (Collinson and Collinson, 1996: 36) or would blame the
victim for becoming confrontational and causing a scene.
There was a sense of unity amongst fellow female workers they all had felt the need
and ‘obligation’ to provide informal advice to new female recruits in the form of
avoiding certain people, Dick, and places at work, for instance ’gropers alley’ also
known as the “badly-lit filling room.”
In a retail environment, hostility and harassment can occur during a face-to-face
encounter with a disgruntled customer or in a phone-to-phone encounter where a
customer is dissatisfied with the service. Researchers have identified this field of
employment, call-centre workers, having significantly receiving rude, racial and
dehumanising forms of behaviour from customers (Healy, 2000; Korczynski, 2002;
Nath 2011).
Workers as part of their role for Indian call-centres must adapt and display distinct
Western accents (Bryson, 2007). As well as use Western pseudonyms during
customer interactions to disillusion customers from their Indian identity to fit the
company’s national identity (D’Cruz and Noronha, 2008; Poster, 2007). Inevitably
customers tend to discover such “flaw” which discredits and “stigmatises” these
workers (Nath, 2011:710). In this scenario, both the customer and the company are
Candidate No. 229695
forcing the worker to manage and “conceal their disreputable (Indian)
markers” (Nath, 2011:710) which inevitably leaves the worker suffering from low
self-esteem, anxiety and forms of depression (Link and Phelan, 2001).
Walby (1988) theorised sexual harassment as a patriarchal control strategy used by
men to keep women in “their place” (Walby, 1988). She argues that sexual
harassment is about control of women, Cockburn contends that men’s social power
gives them a degree of ‘sexual authority’ in the workplace which conveys the
message to women that “you’re only a woman…and at that level your vulnerable to
me and any man” (1991: 142). The use of the word ‘vulnerable’ places women in a
marginalised position as they viewed as a ‘prey’ only for the animalistic pleasures of
men who
Conclusion
It has become increasingly apparent the discourses around gender plays a
fundamental role in influencing the types of role men and women are ‘assigned’ as
suited to their socially constructed role in society. The construction of gendered roles
is intrinsically linked to the status and expectations of a work role, interlocking the
process by which men and women are deemed as performing the role of their
‘biology’ (Oakley, 1974). Workplace interactions and relationships are heavily
subjected to the gender encompassed; women are viewed as caregivers and therefore
are largely able to secure domestic duties which is socially constructed as a ‘natural’
part of womanhood (Williams, 1993; Carreon, Cassedy and Borman, 2013).Similarly,
the male sex is assigned paid employment that is viewed as corresponding with their
‘assigned’ gender; with their ‘natural role’ occupying the labour force, of which
highlights their ‘masculinity’ and enables them to ‘perform’ their gender as the
natural breadwinner (Ross, 2016).
Gender plays a significant role in influencing the processes of whether women will
secure paid employment in the face of gendered institutional structures. Feminists
Candidate No. 229695
have highlighted how institutional structures that reproduce the current expectations
of an unpaid role are also emerging as supporting women’s current subordinate
position in the face of paid work. The discourse and gender ideology consumed by
society is reflected in the ways in which women’s paid work often mirrors their
unpaid work; the belief they are the natural gender to encompass service work
(Williams, 1990).
Basow, S. A. (1992). Gender Stereotypes and Roles, Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks
Bratton, J., Denham. D and Deutschmann, L. (2009). Capitalism and Classical
Sociological Theory, Toronto : University of Toronto Press
Butler, J. (2011). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, New
York: Routledge
Cann, A. and Siegfried, D.(1990). "Gender Stereotypes And Dimensions Of Effective
Leader Behaviour". Sex Roles 23.7-8 pp. 413-419.
Carreron, S., Cassedy, A. & Borman, K. (2013). Women and Work: A Handbook NY/
London: Garland Publishing
Churchich (1990). Marxism and Alienation. Rutherford [N.J.], Fairleigh Dickinson
University Press
Collinson, M. and Collinson, D. (1996). 'It's Only Dick: The Sexual Harassment of
Women Managers in insurance Sales', Work, Employment and Society, 10(1), pp.
29-56
Cook, S. (2002). Customer Care Excellence: How to Create an Effective Customer
Focus, London: Kogan Page
Connell, R. (2002) Gender Cambridge, Oxford and Malden: Polity
D’Cruz, P. and Noronoha, E. (2006). Being professional: organisational control in
Indian Call Centers. Social Science Computer Review 24(3): 342-61
Fineman, S. (2011). Organising Age. Oxford/NY:Oxford University Press
Candidate No. 229695
Halbert, T. and Ingulf, E. (2014). Law and Ethics in the Business Environment,
Stamford : Cengage Learning
Herring, C. and Henderson, L. (2015). Diversity In Organizations. New York:
Routledge
Heyes, C. (2006). "Foucault Goes To Weight Watchers". Hypatia 21(2) pp. 126-149
Hobbs, D., Hadfield, P., Lister, S. and Widow, S. (2002). 'Door lore: the art and
economics of intimidation', British Journal of Criminology, 42: 353-70
Hochschild, A. (1983). The Managed Heart. Berkeley, CA: University of California
Press
House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee (2006). ‘Jobs for the Girls: The
Effect of Occupational Segregation on the Gender Pay Gap’, Sixtieth Report of
Session 2004-05 HC 300-1
Korczynski, M. (2002). Human Resource Management in Service Work, Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan
MacKinnon, C. (1979). Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sex
Discrimination New Haven London: Yale University Press
Monaghan, L. F. (2002). Hard Men, Shop Boys and Others: Embodying Competence
in a Masculinist Occupation. The Sociological Review, 50(3), pp. 334–355.
Nath, V. (2011). “Aesthetic And Emotional Labour Through Stigma: National
Identity Management And Racial Abuse in Offshored Indian Call Centres". Work,
Employment and Society 25(4) pp. 709-725.
Oakley, J. G. (2000). Gender-based Barriers to Senior Management Positions:
Understanding the the Scarcity of Female CEOs,
Journal of Business Ethics 27
Oakley, A. (1974).The Sociology Of Housework. London: Robertson
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2013) Women in the Labour Market
Available at https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/
employmentandemployeetypes/articles/womeninthelabourmarket/2013-09-25
(Accessed on 15 April 2017)
Rafaeli, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1989). The Expression of Emotion in Organisational life.
In Staw, B. & Cummings, L. (Eds.), Research in Organisational
Behaviour . Greenwich, CT: JAI pp. 1-42
Candidate No. 229695
Ross, L. (2016). Interrogating Motherhood Edmonton: Athbasca University
The Guardian (2016) “Gender pay gap means women 'working for free from now
until 2017’”. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/nov/10/womenworking-
for-free-until-2017-equal-pay-gender-pay-gap-fawcett-society (Accessed on
15 April 2017)
Walby, S. (1988). Gender Segregation At Work. Milton Keynes: Open University
Press.
Wasson, D. (2012). How To Increase Retail Sales. Cork: BookBaby.
West C. and Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing Gender. Gender & Society 1(2) pp.
125-151.
Williams, C. (1993). Doing Women's Work: Men in Non-Traditional Occupations,
London: Sage
Winlow, S., Hobbs, D., Hadfield, P., Lister, S., (2001). 'Get Ready to Duck: Bouncers
and the Realities of Ethnographic Research on Violent Groups', British Journal of
Criminology, 41, pp. 536-548
Witz, A., Warhurst, C. and Nickson, D. (2003) The Labour Of Aesthetics And The
Aesthetics Of Organization. Organization 10(1) pp. 33-54.