• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is the west to blame for the failure of the global south to achieve economic growth?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

International Relations A To what extent is the west to blame for the failure of the global south to achieve economic growth? Economic growth is something that every country throughout the globe aims to achieve to the highest of their capability. For some countries there are many problems that can occur from trying to get a high economic growth. The problem that has occurred for many years is that the whole globe isn't as equal in terms of development with one another when it comes to how far they have economically grown. The issue being raised is the fact that the global south is far more under developed than the west. However the argument is, to what extent is the west to blame for the under development of the South's economy, if any blame at all. In this essay I will look at all the relevant sections such as international trade, international finance, aid given to countries etc and determine how far the west is to blame for the poor development of the global south. During the essay I will refer to the western countries as the global North or just North at times. When the issue of international trade arises, it is somewhat evident that the west seemingly takes advantage of the poor state in the global south. Many if not all products produced in the third world need to go to the Northern (Western) markets in order to make any substantial profit, which in turn means that they will not get as much profit as the western countries do, even though the labour and resources are from the countries themselves. ...read more.

Middle

The history between the Western Countries and the Global South explains to a certain extent the reason for the south being so under developed in comparison to the global North. There is a big gulf in economies in relation to North, South e.g. Britain's Economy in comparison to Africa's economy. The reason I have used Britain as an example is because of historical relevance. When the British empire emerged in the eighteenth and nineteenth century and stayed until after the second world war, it caused many problems for a lot of the Southern states, which are still to this day feeling the effects from what happened many years ago. Britain along with many other imperial powers throughout Europe used countries in the south as sources of raw materials and as cheap labour. The fact hat this occurred gives evidence to suggest that the west are to blame for the underdevelopment in the global south due to the fact that with so much of the raw materials being taken away from the start, it left the western states with a high advantage and a head start in building a strong economy whereas the south now is still feeling the repercussions of it. Decolonisation was also a problem that caused the global south to rely upon the help of the global west to run their economy to an extent. When decolonisation occurred through the global south, what this meant was that many countries from the North left countries in the global south with many problems which they found hard to deal with, e.g. ...read more.

Conclusion

out of the economic deprivation which it is suffering Also although much of the global South is plagued by violence and terror with large organisations trying to overthrow the government etc, surely to help themselves everyone should try to pull in the same direction. Can someone be helped if they don't help themselves? Overall in conclusion to the question, to what extent is the West to blame for the failure of the South to achieve economic growth? I would have to say that I believe that blame can be emphasised on both sides. Wallerstein believes that the core states use the periphery, the south for cheap raw materials and cheap labour. Therefore it is evident that a reason that the South is so economically underdeveloped is because of the way the system works today. It is clear that the west take advantage of the south in order to further their prosperity and economy however, still nothing is done about it in the way of new stricter laws etc. However although the West is to blame for taking advantage of the global South's underdevelopment, the south has not helped itself in fighting back or trying to create a better economy for itself. Lack of innovation due to the reliance of western products has not helped the south but has just left them stuck with the same problem. Therefore to sum it all up, the west to a large extent is to blame for the failure of the south to achieve economic growth but the south is to blame too. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Human & Social Geography section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Human & Social Geography essays

  1. What difference does development aid make, if any? Illustrate your answer with country examples.

    Boone concluded that , 'in terms of growth prospects ,no amount of foreign aid can substitute for a developing country's internal policies'(Boone 1996:290)Using cross-sectional data Griffin,Enos and Weisskopf concluded that there is in fact a negative relationship between aid and economic growth(Griffin et al 2002:14).In contrast to Cassen's findings aid

  2. Causes to Slow Economic Development in Less Developing Countries.

    Export earnings paid the most but not all of these imports. Large resource transfers in the form of foreign aid financed these deficits. LDCs also received help from the World Bank and other international banks like the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

  1. AIDS Why is South Africa so heavily plagued with this disease as opposed to ...

    epidemic in Africa are more sexually active than people from Western Europe (Poku 194). These facts imply that it is not just the sexual behavior of Africans that is causing AIDS to be so prevalent, but that there is something in the culture of Africa which is conducive to sexually transmitted diseases (STDs).

  2. disability essay

    However, these were rewards that came only after their persistent struggle to protect their children from injustice. Taking pride in small accomplishments that "normal" children do easily was an important but difficult part of finding those rewards, as neighbours and extended family did not see "how far the kids have

  1. Development and subordination of women in the Third World.

    Women were also discouraged to participate in agriculture. Boserup quoted the empirical study in Uganda and detailed the way men were introduced to cash crop cultivation by modern methods. While women continued subsistence crop cultivation for the family using traditional methods.

  2. Does foreign aid do more harm than good ?

    The two main agencies, the World Bank and the IMF, claim that their international status makes them totally objective and so enables them to make value free decisions on the distribution of ODA. Their stated aim is to promote and implement economic policies favourable to development.

  1. Globalisation in India

    Fiscal reforms sought to eliminate government debt, and stabilise the economy mainly through privatisation. The government sold many public sector organizations, and as a result has implemented strategies to improve the communication between public and private companies. The regulation within infrastructure sectors has reduced, and many foreign companies have been

  2. The Growth in Power of the Mexican Drug Cartels

    This type of government left little if anything up to debate; the decisions were made by the leaders thus creating a strong solid state of Mexico in which political opposition was consistently dealt with. By 1945 after the Second World War, the PRI had solidified a relationship with traffickers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work