• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the theory of Relative Deprivation, critically discuss the causes of an urban riot.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using the theory of Relative Deprivation, critically discuss the causes of an urban riot. The theory of relative deprivation has been widely used as the mechanism for explaining the involvement of people in social phenomena such as urban riots. Relative deprivation happens when need achievement falls short of a reasonable standard (Deutsch et al, 2006:850). In other words, through depriving people of their rights a buildup of frustration and tension occurs which entices the onset of aggressive behavior (Walker and Smith, 2002:1). The theory is therefore useful in determining why people riot as a result of social deprivation. The whole concept of Relative deprivation (RD) was originally envisaged to explain a whole series of relationships between various individuals' feelings of satisfaction and their corresponding positions within the armed forces (Walker and Smith, 2002:2). However, in recent times the theory has developed and advanced in such a way that it is now applicable to a wide variation of scenarios. According to Diana Kendall, people who are satisfied with their present conditions are less likely to seek social change (Kendall, 2008:555). Social change generally arises as a response to the perception that people are being denied what they deserve (Kendall, 2008:555). ...read more.

Middle

Relative deprivation can be divided into three distinctive patterns: decrimental deprivation, aspirational deprivation and progressive deprivation. All three are similar in terms of the fact that they all illustrate a discrepancy between value expectations and value capabilities. According to Gurr and Robert, decrimental deprivation occurs when value expectations remain constant whilst the institutional capacity to meet the values declines (Gurr and Robert, 1971:47). On the other hand, aspirational deprivation is the opposite movement and involves an increase in value expectations at the expense of institutional capabilities, which remain constant (Gurr and Robert 1971:51). This sort of deprivation is generally associated with societies that are undergoing rapid social and economic alterations. Progressive deprivation is also known as the J-curve model and is used to describe a situation in which rising expectations are matched by rising capabilities for a short period of time. However, over time a gap starts to develop between the value expectations and capabilities (Gurr and Robert, 1971:53). Relative deprivation intensity varies depending on a variety of factors including the perceived scale of the discrepancy between expectations and capabilities and according to Michael Kimmel 'the number of alternative outlets for aggressive behaviour besides political violence' and even 'the number of satisfactions that might depress the level of frustration' (Kimmel, 1990:78). ...read more.

Conclusion

Relative deprivation can be applied to understand the reasoning behind many different social movements and conflicts ranging from analysing early European communities during the industrial revolution who were prone to rioting in response to the growing threat of urban and industrial expansion whilst modern day Britain has been plagued by rising street crime and collective violence which has primarily been attributed to increasing political marginality coupled with an accentuated sense of relative deprivation which in turn has been blamed on excessive mass media portrayal of popular culture that has only succeeded in lowering morale amongst many unemployed and disadvantaged people therefore heightening their feelings of relative deprivation (McLaughlin et al, 2003:148). The theory of relative deprivation has been used to explain many of the violent conflicts that have erupted throughout the world in recent times. According to the theory riots and conflict generally arise as a response to the perception that people are being denied what they feel they deserve. According to Diana Kendall, people who are satisfied with their present conditions are less likely to seek social change (Kendall, 2008:555), this idea emphasizes the fact that social change is rooted in the idea that people's reactions to objective circumstances depend on their subjective comparisons (Walker and Smith, 1:2002). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political Theories section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political Theories essays

  1. rational choice theory

    The first and second dimensions of power can be attributed to Robert Dahl, Morton Baratz and Peter Bachrach. Robert Dahl's highly simplified definition of power provided a strong point from which Baratz and Bachrach could develop and include the aspects of decision-making and non-decision making surrounding the area of power that involves setting the agenda.

  2. Realism remains the dominant paradigm in International Relations theory. Discuss

    The realist approach is summed up quite well by one statement in the Melian Dialogue ".......right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must."

  1. What is theory, and why is it important?

    The purpose of theory in the early years of the discipline was to change the world for the better by removing war. A close connection existed between theory and practice: theory was not disconnected from the actual world of politics.

  2. Nationalism is inherently expansionist and destructive. Discuss.

    territories where these states sought to expand their rule, and it ended, during the 20th century, in gigantic inter-state wars at the centre. World Wars I and II brought the defeat of Germany and Italy in comparison with France, England, America and Russia, but all of Europe suffered from war devastation.

  1. Every person who possesses both free will and reason has an obligation to take ...

    institution is just.6 In criticism of the fair play principle, states are not associations that can be opted in or out of by the citizens without restrictions. The theory also grounds the political obligation in the category of citizens only, resulting in not everyone being covered, as some people are not citizens of any particular state.

  2. When, if ever, do citizens have an obligation to obey the law?

    Costs involved in leaving the state can also mean that tacit consent cannot always be valid: there is no choice if the cost of a person leaving a state is unaffordable (Hume, 1748). Despite these criticisms, this does not mean that the consent theory should be rejected outright, as the

  1. To what extent can the globalised economy explain key developments in the motor industry?

    For example, trade disputes concerning automobiles. It has been discussed as being related to the arguments of what should be the correct way to handle automobile trade, the balance of trade, and the job security for a countries' labour force (Mulgan, 1998).

  2. Is indirect realism a plausible theory of perception?

    This could be explained by saying that we cannot directly perceive external objects because of possible illusions where as we can fully trust our inner mental images because we would not delude ourselves. There is another argument against indirect realism, which says that if a subject perceives an idea, then they are in genuine relation to the idea.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work