• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the theory of Relative Deprivation, critically discuss the causes of an urban riot.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using the theory of Relative Deprivation, critically discuss the causes of an urban riot. The theory of relative deprivation has been widely used as the mechanism for explaining the involvement of people in social phenomena such as urban riots. Relative deprivation happens when need achievement falls short of a reasonable standard (Deutsch et al, 2006:850). In other words, through depriving people of their rights a buildup of frustration and tension occurs which entices the onset of aggressive behavior (Walker and Smith, 2002:1). The theory is therefore useful in determining why people riot as a result of social deprivation. The whole concept of Relative deprivation (RD) was originally envisaged to explain a whole series of relationships between various individuals' feelings of satisfaction and their corresponding positions within the armed forces (Walker and Smith, 2002:2). However, in recent times the theory has developed and advanced in such a way that it is now applicable to a wide variation of scenarios. According to Diana Kendall, people who are satisfied with their present conditions are less likely to seek social change (Kendall, 2008:555). Social change generally arises as a response to the perception that people are being denied what they deserve (Kendall, 2008:555). ...read more.

Middle

Relative deprivation can be divided into three distinctive patterns: decrimental deprivation, aspirational deprivation and progressive deprivation. All three are similar in terms of the fact that they all illustrate a discrepancy between value expectations and value capabilities. According to Gurr and Robert, decrimental deprivation occurs when value expectations remain constant whilst the institutional capacity to meet the values declines (Gurr and Robert, 1971:47). On the other hand, aspirational deprivation is the opposite movement and involves an increase in value expectations at the expense of institutional capabilities, which remain constant (Gurr and Robert 1971:51). This sort of deprivation is generally associated with societies that are undergoing rapid social and economic alterations. Progressive deprivation is also known as the J-curve model and is used to describe a situation in which rising expectations are matched by rising capabilities for a short period of time. However, over time a gap starts to develop between the value expectations and capabilities (Gurr and Robert, 1971:53). Relative deprivation intensity varies depending on a variety of factors including the perceived scale of the discrepancy between expectations and capabilities and according to Michael Kimmel 'the number of alternative outlets for aggressive behaviour besides political violence' and even 'the number of satisfactions that might depress the level of frustration' (Kimmel, 1990:78). ...read more.

Conclusion

Relative deprivation can be applied to understand the reasoning behind many different social movements and conflicts ranging from analysing early European communities during the industrial revolution who were prone to rioting in response to the growing threat of urban and industrial expansion whilst modern day Britain has been plagued by rising street crime and collective violence which has primarily been attributed to increasing political marginality coupled with an accentuated sense of relative deprivation which in turn has been blamed on excessive mass media portrayal of popular culture that has only succeeded in lowering morale amongst many unemployed and disadvantaged people therefore heightening their feelings of relative deprivation (McLaughlin et al, 2003:148). The theory of relative deprivation has been used to explain many of the violent conflicts that have erupted throughout the world in recent times. According to the theory riots and conflict generally arise as a response to the perception that people are being denied what they feel they deserve. According to Diana Kendall, people who are satisfied with their present conditions are less likely to seek social change (Kendall, 2008:555), this idea emphasizes the fact that social change is rooted in the idea that people's reactions to objective circumstances depend on their subjective comparisons (Walker and Smith, 1:2002). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political Theories section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political Theories essays

  1. rational choice theory

    The first and second dimensions of power can be attributed to Robert Dahl, Morton Baratz and Peter Bachrach. Robert Dahl's highly simplified definition of power provided a strong point from which Baratz and Bachrach could develop and include the aspects of decision-making and non-decision making surrounding the area of power that involves setting the agenda.

  2. What is theory, and why is it important?

    This idea was challenged by the Neorealist's such as Kenneth Waltz. Waltz focused his discussion in the effects of the international system rather than the characteristics of human nature. He also believed that defence is better than offence, thus stronger states do not attack each other unless they are sure

  1. Realism remains the dominant paradigm in International Relations theory. Discuss

    Military force as a form of leverage does not seem nearly as all-important as realism implies. It is a costly way to influence other actors, as compared with diplomacy, conflict resolution, peacekeeping, and other non-military means. International organisations, laws, and norms create stable contexts for bargaining, making non-military leverage increasingly

  2. Is indirect realism a plausible theory of perception?

    It seems clear that the idea and subject are not logically independent. I am in genuine relation with my shadow however I would not assert that my shadow is therefore logically independent of me. Mental ideas are caused by subjects interacting with external objects which then produces the idea, the

  1. Every person who possesses both free will and reason has an obligation to take ...

    The principle is also only applicable to the fundamental laws, excluding other categories of law, which damages its applicability to the obligation to obey the law. A further theory justifying the citizen's obligation to obey the law is through his consent.

  2. When, if ever, do citizens have an obligation to obey the law?

    concept does not set out to find a causal relationship between all citizens and their states (Beran 1987: 100 ).

  1. To what extent can the globalised economy explain key developments in the motor industry?

    The hallmark of this system was standardisation. Standardisation required nearly perfect interchange ability of parts. To achieve this, Ford exploited advances in machine tools and gauging systems. These innovations made possible the moving, or continuous, assembly line, in which each assembler performed a single, repetitive task (O'Neil, 1991).

  2. Nationalism is inherently expansionist and destructive. Discuss.

    On the other side, this sort of nationalism is as reactionary. It looks back to the past glories e.g. Mussolini and the Roman Empire. It's a fascist idea that nations are going to be reform after a period of weakness corruption which is know as polygenesis as Rigger Grills argued.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work