• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the core skills required to write good history today

Extracts from this document...


What are the core skills required to write good history today? In order to identify what the core skills are required to write an example of good history today, first the concept of history itself must be examined, defined and placed in context. It is clear that history is not a strictly well-defined discipline, integrating a combination of sub-genres such as political, social, religious, gender, and imperial history, with various theories of meta-narrative history such as Marxism, Empiricism and, to an extent, Postmodernism. To further aid the confusion of a clear definition, the term history has its own social and cultural context within any given society. However, even amidst this, it appears that the main consensus, at least in the academic field, is that history can be defined as 'the study and interpretation of the record of human people, families, and societies'1. Now that a definition has been identified, although it is albeit rather limited in terms of explaining the various theories and sub-categories of the historical discipline, what must be examined next are the skills required to write an example of such history. ...read more.


Sources are, in the postmodern viewpoint, 'never taken at their word...but critically interrogated'10. Paradoxically, some postmodernists would even go as far as saying that perhaps secondary sources are more useful than primary, due to the fact that secondary sources are 'the product of the historian's cogitation and skill...[and are] in the cultural sense far more important'11. Furthermore, postmodernists point to the ambiguity of language and its meaning throughout the centuries, and the fact that the majority of primary sources are in fact copies of copies, where there have been countless opportunities for error to occur. These considerations therefore 'undermine any confidence that the texts...can be validated'12 by empiricist methodologies or philosophies. Once adequate research has been undertaken on the topic of choice, and the sources have been collected, analysed, and interpreted, the historian must being the latter of the two fundamental principles of writing history, physically documenting the narrative, or writing it. When writing history, there appears to be one factor that marks a difference between what can be label 'good' and 'bad' history - communication. So, not only must a historian research and collect sources that are relevant to the topic at hand (and by doing so going through all the processes aforementioned), they must also be able to, as Arthur Marwick proposed, communicate in 'clear and precise language'13. ...read more.


Instead however it disagrees with empiricist philosophies of historical knowledge. For modern works (modern in the sense of being written within the last 20 years) to be classified as postmodern, they must recognise that it is impossible to depict reality in an objective way in any text (due to a variety of factors, including language, discourse, and representation), so therefore texts instead depict re-presentations of reality based on the social discourses at the time. Furthermore the author must accept the inherent power based within the structures of society, be it political, social or cultural, and the power of language and, perhaps strangest of all, how all historical texts are incapable of attaining originality because the discourses surrounding them must have already existed. In conclusion therefore, the core skills require to write good history can be dissected into three main parts; the two fundamental principles of research and writing, within each incorporating their own inherent rules and concepts to adhere to; and the notion of social acceptance (via the audience's readings and obedience to history's current dominant hegemony) for a text to become a 'good' piece of history which, in this case, is the adherence to empiricist method and postmodernist philosophy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Power is Everywhere - Michael Foucault. In the books Discipline and Punish and ...

    little extra strength'.15 The fact that individuals were resistant to the process of normalization was also an important part of the overall theory. "The theory of government...permits Foucault to explain how individuals are always resistant to complete incorporation within the normalizing process of subjectification.

  2. social research, reflection and writing

    The researchers found that people living in a community based setting had more choices, were treated more like equals and could do more of what they wanted. However, people who lived in residential places had less choice, this it was said, was partly due to the nature of the home and the limitations on support staff.

  1. Can postmodern families be functional?

    Firstly, traditional families tended to be very much extended families. "This term refers to a family system in which several generations live in one household." (Oxford dictionary of Sociology, John Scott & Gordon Marshall, 211.)

  2. Durkheim's core theoretical concepts

    had different responsibilities, principles and interests according to their own needs and the collective conscious of an organic society is based on groups rather than the whole society as you would find in a mechanical society. 'There is then, a social structure of determined nature to which mechanical solidarity corresponds.

  1. Analyse the construction of femininity in the text(s) of your choice.

    He focuses on passive women, rescued by brave men. This is a fundamental issue within feminist theory. Feminist ideas promote equality between men and women. The feminist theory believes women have been oppressed, simply due to their sex, and the idea of patriarchy.

  2. The Cultural Marxism of Work Reform

    by the end of the article the class that was once ruled has become part of the ruling class. Gramsci suggested, "In a hegemonic system, democracy between the ruling group and the ruled groups exists to the extent that the development of the economy, and therefore of the legislation which

  1. Modern Political Thought.

    We also create social institutions which corrupt out natures by being built on amour proper or egoistic self-love. Our natural love of self (amour de soi) is merely concerned with our preservation - this does not put us into conflict one with another, and it is coupled with pity as a minimal concern for others not suffering pain.

  2. China: A New History by John King Fairbanks.

    This can be traced to Confucius teachings. One of the Confucius concepts is "Zhong" which states that the people should be loyal to the state and to people of higher status. Inferior people must follow the direction of or emulate the behavior of the superior person. Because of the Chinese people's believe in the Confucius teachings, social

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work