What are the general Arguments of two main theoretical perspectives on gender inequality V functional analysis and conflict analysis?

Authors Avatar

Hermony Lee        第  页        6/18/2007

To: Dr. Richard Lam Cheung

Fm: Group 6

CLASS: SOCIOLOGY 101

SECTION 4

TOPIC

What are the general Arguments of two main theoretical perspectives on gender inequality – functional analysis and conflict analysis?

If you were a functionalist, what would you say should be done, if any, about gender inequality in Hong Kong?

As a conflict theorist, what would you say, if any, should be done in Hong Kong? Explain?

Group Members:

 

                                

CONTENTS 

1.        Introduction        

Research Problem:        

Objective:        

Appendix 4: Table studied under Thematic Report – Women and Men, Population Census 2001, Hong Kong(BTT)        


  1. Introduction

Research Problem:

  1. Does gender inequality exists in Hong Kong?
  2. If there were, can these be explained by the social theories.
  3. What measures can be proposed to reduce the gender inequality identified in

Objective:

-        To Study the sociological problem of gender and sex over the years 1991 to 2001 using sociological theories. We focus areas in:

  1. Education        
  2. Employment & Incomes        
  3. Human Rights & Politics

-        Make recommendation of improvements to help reduce gender inequality, if there were any.

Methodology:

Given the limited resources both in terms of manpower and finance and further taking into account of the urgency of the project, the team had decided to focus on comparing the gender status between years 1991 and 2001.

We noticed that the government had just completed a census in year 2001. Comparison data were available also on gender.  We conclude the report is of great use t us:-

  1. the census data is up to date,
  2. the census data covers the entire Hong Kong Society
  3. The census data serves general public interest and provides and objective and reliable data for comparison.

As such, the team decided to adopt this secondary source data.

Approach:

We therefore secured the following information.

  1. Main Tables, 2001 Population Census published by the Census and Statistics Department.
  2. Thematic Report – Women and Men published by the Census and Statistics Department.
  3. Additional Information by mainly surfing the web.  

As said, our main focus is on the thematic report.  

Based on this report, the team had conducted extensive numerical comparison over years 1991, 1996 and 2001.  In the course, we looked for symptoms of gender inequality and the momentum.  We made attempts to test whether or not functionalism and conflict  perspective can explain such inequality.  

The team is comprised of 6 male members and 1 female member (we invited a female member in recognition of her view point as female)

 

In order to better utilize the team talent and team mix, each member was assigned to study the data individually and each member came up with an observation list.  With these lists, we held an in-depth group discussion amongst the members.

Through cross tabulations, reference checking, we verified our findings. Based on the conclusion of the team this report was prepared.

Remarks/Legends:

Throughout this document, the following terms are used interchangeably:

  • male, masculine, men to refer to masculine gender
  • female, feminine, women to refer to feminine gender
  • when table, chart and diagram number or mentioned, they are referred to the corresponding table, chart or diagram contained of the same title contained in the Thematic Report – Women and Men, Population Census 2001, Hong Kong
  • we treat foreign maids, for the purpose of studying gender inequality, a non-Hong Kong element, as we opine that these maids would not normally domicile in Hong Kong. This applies to most tables/numbers.  In the case where there are no comparable data, we would use gross number (i.e. including foreign maids’) but would caution readers of our interpretation.
  • when quoted:
  • HKSAR: refers to the Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Zone
  • (Conflict): refers to Conflict Theorists, their theories, perspectives or arguments
  • (Function): refers to Factionalists, their theories, perspectives or arguments
  • “The Years” in this paper refers to comparison of data between years 1991, in some cases 1996, and 2001.  

  1. General Arguments towards Gender Inequality

It is important to understand the difference between the terms sex and gender as our research is on gender.

Simply speaking, the terms male and female describe a person’s biological sex.

On the other hand, the term feminine and masculine are socially constructed genders.  Our research focus is on gender as opposed to sex.

The functionalist perspective focuses on the original development of gender, while conflict theory concentrates on the reason gender continues to exist.  Symbolic Interactionism attempts to explain the ways in which gender is acquired.

A.        Functionalism

The basic argument from the functionalists is that equality is justifiable and in fact necessary to maintain order. They argue the top of the hierarchy possess talents and skills that is important to maintain survival and further growth of the society.  These talents and skills are either unique or require lengthy training process.  Very often, that means of forgoing enjoyment during the period of training.  

In relation to gender, the inequality is functional in rewarding man to be tough and stand on their own feet to support the family or also reward women for gaining motherhood, housekeeping, and caring husband.  Such a split of tasks ensures harmonization within families on which the economy grows.

They maintain that inter-dependence such that each gender specializes on fits to them respectively to be best of the natural talents, personalities, characters, physique, biological make up as well as their roles in the family in securing food and for reproduction, and of course the skills acquired in the course of so doing.  It is argued that this natural division labor did not only maximize output and therefore the chance of survival and revival to the mankind but also avoid confrontation, dispute that may cause harmonization between the two genders, bearing in mind that the reproduction would require the collaboration between the genders.  

In the primitive societies, the close cooperation between the genders of defined tasks also ensures mutual understanding and mutual adjustments in performing tasks which coordination is key to success.  This is especially important for whose tasks that could not be performed individually either due to limit of strength of reach (e.g. the husband scratching the wife’s back, the husband assists his wife in delivering a baby, and making love)

Join now!

Naturally, specialization took place as a result of division of labor between the genders. To achieve highest efficiency in the course of specialization, genders are conditioned swiftly.  For example, male hunters’ lives were at anger when hunting wild animals. Their own nature (mentally and physically) drove them to build up courage and face the challenge because they needed the food for survival. So courage was important in keeping men to face life and death hunting situation.  Another example is in tendering babies.  Newborn babies are weak in their only nature, so women had to treat with their babies with ...

This is a preview of the whole essay