• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the main features of Marshall's theory of citizenship?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the main features of Marshall's theory of citizenship? T. H. Marshall's theory of citizenship is the most recent theoretical model developed in the 1950s. He elaborated his ideas around the three rights elements, civil, political and social rights. He argued for equality of status rather than that due to the labour market. Along with all theories Marshall did not go without criticism, I will conclude with some of these criticisms and focus on the contemporary problems of citizenship. Prior to explaining Marshall's definition of citizenship, more general explanations can be offered. Citizenship refers to the position of being a citizen, and the collection of rights and duties of this position. These rights define the socio-political membership with the consequence of allocation of collective benefits to the social groups, households and individuals. Citizenship therefore comprises the individuals as fully- fledged members of a socio- political community, whether it is an inhabitant of a city or as a native. This provides the individual with access to limited resources, supplying social or legal protection from unexpected uncertainties of the market place and related life-cycle disadvantages. Within the modern society citizenship creates new types of social solidarity in term of public relations of the exchanging of possessions with others for mutual benefit; this establishes new intergenerational bonds of loyalty and obligation outside the family. ...read more.

Middle

The third element is that of social citizenship. Marshall identifies this final element as being the individual's independent access to the basic social goods provided by the community to its members. Therefore the access to welfare benefits, the range of welfare services from education to medical treatment form part of this third element. Marshall gave a celebratory lecture in 1949 to the establishment of the British welfare state. A state he declares 'gives concrete application to these social rights'. He believed the modern state now cared for the individual, representing them. The social rights ensured equality of opportunity to education, the medical and welfare services. Marshall thought the procession of all three of these elements of rights a guarantee of formal equality, a formal equality that puts an end to the inequalities of class and status formed by the capitalist society. Marshall argues that in English legal and political life these three stages formed by a gradual sequential development. The development of civil rights marked the distinction between a feudal society to one of independent, leading to equal persons. Once this was attained, the next move was towards universal suffrage and political participation by all, including the ability to fully exercise those political rights and obligations. This structure then sets the path towards his third stage, social citizenship, and a welfare state where all citizens are able to enjoy the protections of the society in which they live. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore the evolution implied in Marshall's plan is, as Mann believes an illusion; 'Sociologists are prone to forget that "evolution" is often geopolitically assisted'. Ralph Dahrendorf deals with Marshall's central theme of the significance of class in a stage where citizenship has conferred one universal equality of status on all citizens. He combines Marxian notions of class conflict with Marshall's theory, seeing the relationship between citizenship and social class in terms of a broader 'struggle for life chances.' Using Marshall's account of the progression of national citizenship to join the normative debate on the uses of nationalism, he argues that: "Historically at least, the nation-state was as much a necessary condition of progress as it unfortunately turned out to be a source of regression and inhumanity. The alliance of nationalism and liberalism was a force for emancipation"(Bulmer and Rees, 1996, p. 29). Nationality and citizenship were are entangled for Dahrendorf as the only advantage of the nation state he saw was that it made generalisations of the ancient idea of citizenship. The problem of Marshall's work is noticeably the vagueness to the status of the theoretical idea. The three stage model of civil, political and social rights could be questioned for concentrating too heavily on the rights and not the responsibilities. Marshall's work, whilst being informative for the modern phase in English national history it is no longer transforming for the current globalising, fragmenting world. Marshall's theory vague even in his time is now even harder to maintain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Modern Political Thought.

    to give yourself into slavery is immoral. Each of these arguments against slavery raises issues about the nature of coercion, but they do not mean that despotic regimes are legitimate. Freedom as non-domination and freedom as subjection to the general will. Rousseau's positive theory of freedom. Contrast with Berlin on negative liberty and with 'republican theories' - Pettit and Skinner.

  2. To what extent, therefore, has current Labour Government Policy successful tackled the issue of ...

    * Of this amount... o 93% were offered a tenancy in social housing with long-term security of tenure. o 6% accepted a fixed-term assured shorthold tenancy in the private sector. o 29% of these households received an immediate settled solution without resorting to temporary accommodation.

  1. A Critique of New Social Movement Theory.

    movement's social base and identifying their interests and/ or values is sufficient to explain that movement (Bagguley 1992: 33,36).20 At issue here is what counts as good explanation. It is not, of course, that the structural conditions in which movements occur are of no significance.

  2. To critically discuss the claim that citizenship is a contested and fluid concept, this ...

    It is also contested from a Marxist perspective as its acceptance allows the state to legitimatise inequality and perpetuate the capitalist market (Crompton, 1998). Further criticisms of the model are its ethnocentricity, reductionism and evolutionist stance. It is argued by Crompton (1998)

  1. The ethnic minority population of the United Kingdom has increased at a tremendous rate ...

    seen through until the end...Bradford is very good at so called visions, strategies and initiatives but very poor at making them work at ground level. Questions remain to be answered as to what difference the strategies put forward since the 1995 troubles have made."

  2. Critical Theory

    to its subject matter. What distinguishes such an approach is an alternativeness to contradictions. These are relational contradictions meaning oppositions which are both necessary for, and yet destructive of, particular processes or entities (Neufeld, 2001). Basically, it is the exploration of resulting crises and ways in which these might resolve themselves.

  1. Consensus perspective

    As they develop, Marx proposed, that the new forces of production tend to create a new set of relations of production. Subsequently, change and social order will both be affected, with the epoch of history, eradicating past social relationships. Marx believed that the final epoch of history would be the communist or socialist society.

  2. Assess the contribution of Critical Theory to the interparadigm debate in International Relations.

    The rise of positivism, as a means of 'bringing increasingly compliant individuals under the complete domination of technical rationality' began translating itself into an increasingly bleak view of the quest for emancipation, with Horkheimer stating that ''reason' has never really directed social reality, but now, reason...has finally renounced even the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work