• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the main features of Marshall's theory of citizenship?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the main features of Marshall's theory of citizenship? T. H. Marshall's theory of citizenship is the most recent theoretical model developed in the 1950s. He elaborated his ideas around the three rights elements, civil, political and social rights. He argued for equality of status rather than that due to the labour market. Along with all theories Marshall did not go without criticism, I will conclude with some of these criticisms and focus on the contemporary problems of citizenship. Prior to explaining Marshall's definition of citizenship, more general explanations can be offered. Citizenship refers to the position of being a citizen, and the collection of rights and duties of this position. These rights define the socio-political membership with the consequence of allocation of collective benefits to the social groups, households and individuals. Citizenship therefore comprises the individuals as fully- fledged members of a socio- political community, whether it is an inhabitant of a city or as a native. This provides the individual with access to limited resources, supplying social or legal protection from unexpected uncertainties of the market place and related life-cycle disadvantages. Within the modern society citizenship creates new types of social solidarity in term of public relations of the exchanging of possessions with others for mutual benefit; this establishes new intergenerational bonds of loyalty and obligation outside the family. ...read more.

Middle

The third element is that of social citizenship. Marshall identifies this final element as being the individual's independent access to the basic social goods provided by the community to its members. Therefore the access to welfare benefits, the range of welfare services from education to medical treatment form part of this third element. Marshall gave a celebratory lecture in 1949 to the establishment of the British welfare state. A state he declares 'gives concrete application to these social rights'. He believed the modern state now cared for the individual, representing them. The social rights ensured equality of opportunity to education, the medical and welfare services. Marshall thought the procession of all three of these elements of rights a guarantee of formal equality, a formal equality that puts an end to the inequalities of class and status formed by the capitalist society. Marshall argues that in English legal and political life these three stages formed by a gradual sequential development. The development of civil rights marked the distinction between a feudal society to one of independent, leading to equal persons. Once this was attained, the next move was towards universal suffrage and political participation by all, including the ability to fully exercise those political rights and obligations. This structure then sets the path towards his third stage, social citizenship, and a welfare state where all citizens are able to enjoy the protections of the society in which they live. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore the evolution implied in Marshall's plan is, as Mann believes an illusion; 'Sociologists are prone to forget that "evolution" is often geopolitically assisted'. Ralph Dahrendorf deals with Marshall's central theme of the significance of class in a stage where citizenship has conferred one universal equality of status on all citizens. He combines Marxian notions of class conflict with Marshall's theory, seeing the relationship between citizenship and social class in terms of a broader 'struggle for life chances.' Using Marshall's account of the progression of national citizenship to join the normative debate on the uses of nationalism, he argues that: "Historically at least, the nation-state was as much a necessary condition of progress as it unfortunately turned out to be a source of regression and inhumanity. The alliance of nationalism and liberalism was a force for emancipation"(Bulmer and Rees, 1996, p. 29). Nationality and citizenship were are entangled for Dahrendorf as the only advantage of the nation state he saw was that it made generalisations of the ancient idea of citizenship. The problem of Marshall's work is noticeably the vagueness to the status of the theoretical idea. The three stage model of civil, political and social rights could be questioned for concentrating too heavily on the rights and not the responsibilities. Marshall's work, whilst being informative for the modern phase in English national history it is no longer transforming for the current globalising, fragmenting world. Marshall's theory vague even in his time is now even harder to maintain. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. Outline the main arguments of Rostow and state whether his theory remains useful for ...

    As a theoretical model, Rostow's perspective on modernisation is useful in that it is, whether purposefully or not, very indiscriminate and simplistic: it requires little remoulding to adapt from one culture to the other, because there is no real substance to modify.

  2. Book Review: All that is Solid Melts into Air By Marshall Berman.

    social unrest and civic disorder where people begin to experience modern life- The thirty years war and King Charles of England who was hanged, drawn and quartered, suggest social confusion in this period.

  1. To what extent, therefore, has current Labour Government Policy successful tackled the issue of ...

    he/she has accommodation but it would not be reasonable for him/her to continue to occupy it. DEFINITIONS OF INTENTIONAL HOMELESSNESS: Section 191 (1) and 196 (1) A person becomes homeless, or threatened with homelessness, intentionally if: i) he/she has ceased to occupy accommodation (or there is a likelihood of him/her being forced to leave accommodation)

  2. To critically discuss the claim that citizenship is a contested and fluid concept, this ...

    It is also contested from a Marxist perspective as its acceptance allows the state to legitimatise inequality and perpetuate the capitalist market (Crompton, 1998). Further criticisms of the model are its ethnocentricity, reductionism and evolutionist stance. It is argued by Crompton (1998)

  1. A Critique of New Social Movement Theory.

    Most include a range of positions from left socialist to conservative; most include people actively promoting and resisting linkages with other movements.14 In this context, the argument among some NSM theorists that new movements seek "autonomy" rather than "power," that they are "expressive" rather than "strategic" in inspiration, sounds rather disingenuous.

  2. Expound Durkheim's theory of anomie, bringing out the acute and chronic types. Evaluate Durkheim's ...

    At this point, anomie becomes almost a psychological state of disorder and meaninglessness, rather than the structural characteristic of society and social order that Durkheim originally intended. Durkheim believes that anomie is the main source of the malaise of

  1. The ethnic minority population of the United Kingdom has increased at a tremendous rate ...

    They appear to have accepted the situation as a permanent feature of their lives, and an issue which will never fade from existence. Manawar Jan Kahn, a member of the Manningham Residents Association pointed out that the lack of interaction is largely due to the 'non-existent' provision of suitable opportunities

  2. Theories of Rights. John Rawls, one of the most celebrated contemporary philosophers, puts ...

    Despite Rawls's attempt to create a situation where no one is in a position to tailor principles to their advantage (Boucher & Kelly, 1994), the notion of a 'veil of ignorance' has aroused major criticism, which has consequently tarnished the persuasiveness of his theory.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work