• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What does Kant mean when he says that an action has moral worth only if it is done 'from the motive of duty'? Is he right?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What does Kant mean when he says that an action has moral worth only if it is done 'from the motive of duty'? Is he right? A person's actions are right or wrong, a person is morally worthy or lacks moral worth (i.e., is morally base). A person's actions determine her moral worth, but there is more to this than merely seeing if the actions are right or wrong. All the things we do can be divided into those things which are voluntary actions, and those that are mere behaviour (e.g., knee jerk reflexes). Of course there is no moral worth based on mere behaviours. All voluntary actions can be divided into those that are contrary to duty and those which are not contrary to duty. Kant claims that this distinction is based on the categorical imperative. Clearly, no moral worth is attained by doing actions that are contrary to duty. All those action that are not contrary to duty can be divided again into those action which are required by duty and those actions which are not required by duty. Actions that are required by duty are things like keeping promises, paying debts, and other things that we commonly consider to be our duties. ...read more.

Middle

Kant would argue that based on these actions both drunks are equally bad, and the fact that one person got lucky does not make them any better than the other drunk. After all, they both made the same choices, and nothing within either one's control had anything to do with the difference in their actions. The same reasoning applies to people who act for the right reasons. If both people act for the right reasons, then both are morally worthy, even if the actions of one of them happen to lead to bad consequences by bad luck. There is a further intuitive appeal of this theory, it has the advantage that a person is totally in control of whether they are a good person. A person does not have to be in a position of power and be able to bring about good consequences in order to be a good person, all that they need to do is to act for the right reasons. This makes Kant's theory fairly egalitarian. It also explains how people with greatly differing moral opinions can still have respect for each other as people. It is not just selfishness that is ruled out by Kant's theory, but any motive at all other than morality. ...read more.

Conclusion

There is also a tendency to think that Kant says it is always wrong to do something that just causes your own happiness, like buying an ice cream cone. This also I believe to be false. Kant thinks that you ought to do things to make yourself happy as long as you make sure that they are not immoral (i.e., contrary to duty), and that you would refrain from doing them if they were immoral. Getting ice cream is not immoral, and so you can go ahead and do it. Doing it will not make you a morally worthy person, but it won't make you a bad person either. Many actions that are permissible but not required by duty are neutral in this way. Therefore according to Kant a good person is someone who always does their duty because it is their duty. It is fine if they enjoy doing it, but it must be the case that they would do it even if they did not enjoy it. It seems to me that Kants argument is strong and that he is correct in the idea that moral worth only comes from the sense of duty. Alex O'Cinneide 27th March 2004 PH416 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Religion in Society section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Religion in Society essays

  1. What does it mean to say that moral judgements are subjective? Is the claim ...

    Briefly, to discover the nature of reality it is said that one has to detach oneself from ones senses and previous conceptions and ideas in order to arrive into a state of pure awareness, untainted by our false sense of self.

  2. The entry sets out five individually necessary conditions for anyone to be a candidate ...

    Even the Catholic Church in recent times has been prepared to agree in cases like this one to the turning off of the respirator. Is this merely a case of letting the patient die? It is often said that even if motives and consequences are agreed to be in common,

  1. Suicide: Selfish or Selfless?

    Other loved ones wonder how they could have missed the "suicidal signs". They remember every argument, every negative comment they made, and feel almost certain that they alone are to blame for this person's death. In fact, the most selfish aspect of suicide is leaving loved ones with so much guilt that they may never recover.

  2. 'Self-Preservation and Moral Duty'

    This is not to say that Bauman's conclusions are inevitably concomitant with the truth, if absolute truth exists at all, and there are some general areas of contention to be found with the book as a whole which will be briefly outlined, as well as in the chapter on 'self-preservation

  1. Could moral relativism be true?

    How though could one determine what is right and what is wrong? If enough people believe an action is right it is deemed to be so, and if enough believe it wrong, it is equally deemed wrong. An excellent example is the differing public response to the recent invasion of

  2. Discuss Mills concept of utilitarianism as a moral theory.

    Mill is particular about the idea that the quality of happiness is crucial to its value believing that 'some types of pleasure are more desirable and more valuable than others'(Chapter II)'. It is Mill's suggestion that we should determine pleasures of a higher quality by looking towards people who make the fullest use of their 'highest faculties'(Chapter II)

  1. "What Is A 'Moral Panic'? What Does This Tell Us About Crime And Criminality? ...

    The conflict caused a number of beach huts to be damaged, windows broken and 'scuffles' to break out resulting in ninety-seven arrests. During the following week, national newspapers grabbed attention of readers with headlines such as "Day Of Terror By Scooter Groups" and "Wild Ones Invade Seaside - 97 Arrests".

  2. Do we have the right to die?

    Hence the extenuating circumstances are acknowledged and considered in the admeasurements of the punishment. In all the countries no matter the cultural habits, each and every family takes care of their patients. Also the groups that are dispose in favor of the legalization of euthanasia, have not made their existence perceptible.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work