• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is Politics? Discuss the views of Max Weber, Bernard Crick, Adrian Leftwich and John Schwarzmantel

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What is Politics? Max Weber, Bernard Crick, Adrian Leftwich and John Schwarzmantel This review will attempt to show various authors approach to the question: ?What is Politics??. Max Weber, Bernard Crick, Adrian Leftwich and John Schwarzmantel all offer a comprehendible analysis of this subject in relation to the themes: power and role of the state. Each writers view on politics differs in terms of broad and narrow. Crick?s view of politics as a hole is a fairly narrow view where the theme of consent is what politics is based on. Whereas Leftwich?s approach to politics is broad where he believes politics is within ever human being and can be found in almost every aspect in life. Weber?s view on politics is also fairly broad where leadership is the only aspect that is discussed however it isn?t the only one. Schwarzmantel?s view on politics is related mainly to the distribution of power and how the relationship between two people can be seen as political. ...read more.

Middle

On the other hand Leftwich?s idea of politics is that it is a ?universal and timeless process which organizes and expresses the interactions of people, resources and power? (Leftwich, 1984, p.101). Leftwich clearly identifies previous ideas of power and takes that into thought when deciding his own idea of power is ?it is always present in human affairs? (Leftwich, 1984, p.110). Schwarzmantel links power and state as the main factors of politics: ?Politics is about power and how it is distributed?(Schwarzmantel, 1987, p.2). The main point being made by Schwarzmantel is how power is ?embodied in human beings?(Schwarzmantel, 1987, p.2) and how politics is exists in a broader context where it ?exists in any context where there is a structure of power and struggle for power in an attempt to gain or maintain leadership positions? (Schwarzmantel, 1987, p.2) Weber?s definition of state is that ?state is a human community that (successfully claims the monopoly of the legitimate use of physical force within a given territory? (Weber, 1919) ...read more.

Conclusion

However Weber?s reasoning for this is due to maintaining power of the state as ?territory is on the characteristics of state? (Weber, 1919) and the ?state is considered the sole source of the right to use violence? (Weber, 1919) In conclusion the question: ?what is politics?? has been given sufficient debate by various authors. Max Weber, Bernard Crick, Adrian Leftwich and John Schwarzmantel have all got varying view on the issue, with each of them articulating their own view with justification to their points. Weber?s views on politics show that the power is an element of politics but how it used defines politics as a whole for him. Leftwich?s broad view on how politics is present everywhere proves that politics doesn?t have to contain particular elements but should be considered an activity. Crick on the other hand has the appeal of discussing how the struggle for power isn?t a real thing but has been made to seem the most important. Schwarzmantel makes the interesting point that in every relationship there is politics as one can impose their will on others. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political Theories section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political Theories essays

  1. What is politics? Whilst scholars such as Weber and Schwarzmantel largely focus on defining ...

    To classify China, for example, as a state that has no politics due to its authoritarian structure seems nonsensical. Moreover, this definition would carry major derisory international implications due to the contradiction of such a state being part of a political organization like the United Nations without China itself being political.

  2. The Advocacy Coalition Framework provides an interesting but incomplete account of the role of ...

    Haas demonstrates that epistemic communities share both causal and principled beliefs as well as sharing both knowledge base and interests. This will inevitably lead to epistemic communities being more politically empowered and they become entrenched in political systems and government frameworks.

  1. Nationalism is inherently expansionist and destructive. Discuss.

    However, liberals argue that multi national empires are conservative and lack a common culture. They argue that these nations are the 'prisons of freedom'. They are against freedom. For example, Greek nationals trapped in the Ottoman Empire. Not all liberals were enthusiastic nationalists.

  2. A Study of Nationalism and its relevance in Muslim States.

    Under Stalin, however, the policy of the Comintern, dictated by the need to win friends for the Soviet Union, proceeded in precisely the direction warned against by Lenin. The classic case, of course, was China, where the Chinese Communist Party not only entered the bourgeois nationalist Kuomintang party, but also

  1. An unequal distribution of social goods could not be a just distribution. Discuss.

    society will be there for they will make a decision that is fair to everyone. 7 However Rawls does not assume that anyone will have made this decision given the veil of ignorance but he presents it as a hypothetical thought experiment to showcase the justice that would arise if given thought to the concept.

  2. Women can only be properly represented politically by other women. Discuss

    major issue on which all those extra women in parliament might have been expected to make some difference??. Such an assessment is given strength by the Cowley and Childs?s (2003) report which highlights that these female Labour representatives were no more likely than their male colleagues to rebel against the party whip.

  1. Power. A gets B to do something that he or she would not ...

    he key to the mystery of the world's most individualistic peasantry submitting to a system so alien lies in the land re distribution program. The backbone of effective resistance was broken when the Communists inaugurated the practice of divid ing and eliminating their class enemies one by one.

  2. Aristotle on Politics

    Though it is not necessary to give everyone equal access to public office, it is never wise to exclude entirely any group from power. Constitutions are usually changed by a large, dissatisfied faction that rises up against the people in power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work