• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Where does decision-making power lie in the British executive?

Extracts from this document...


Where does decision-making power lie in the British executive? Ultimately, the decision-making power in the British executive lies in the interdependence of all the key institutions in the central government. It is first important to identify which actors make up the British executive and define what decision-making power involves. Rhodes describes the concept of the core executive as 'all those organisations and procedures which coordinate central government policies, and act as final arbiters of conflict between different parts of the government machine'(Rhodes 1995: 2). In a broad sense, the British executive consists of the interaction between the Prime Minister, the Cabinet, and the Civil Service. Decision-making power within the executive is the ability to control or influence the direction, timing, and scope of policy. To establish that this decision-making power is fluid and not largely entrenched in any single executive institution, an assessment of the Westminister model will explore the debate between the prime ministerial model and the cabinet government model. Throughout the twentieth century, the study of British government has been centred on the Westminister model directly or indirectly (Smith 1999: 9). According to the Westminister model, all decisions are made by Parliament and there is no higher authority. ...read more.


The fact that the Prime Minister has no clearly defined role leaves the powers of the post largely dependent on the political context, situation, and personality. Though the Prime Minister has many resources, these are essentially powerless without support from rest of the executive. In extreme cases, the lack of support by the Cabinet or Parliament can lead to the resignation of the Prime Minister. G.W. Jones gives an account of how Thatcher was forced to resign in 'The Downfall of Margaret Thatcher'. He says: 'She was murdered: assaulted by blows from three sources'. The first blow was by a drop in public opinion polls after a series of policy failures; the second came in November 1990 from the House of Commons in which she was four votes short of the winning number; the third and final blow was by the cabinet. It was only after listening to the views of her cabinet colleagues that Thatcher decided to resign (Jones 1995:103). Her view was that 'if her cabinet was against her, numbers no longer mattered' (The Economist 1991). The Prime Minister only has power when it is allowed by members of the Cabinet, the Parliament, and the British people. ...read more.


This leads to the Whitehall model of government. This model will not be discussed in detail. As Thatcher said, 'advisors advise, ministers decide'. The power of the civil service lies on influence, rather than on decision-making. The Unproductive Debate It is evident that neither the prime ministerial thesis nor the Cabinet government thesis adequately expresses the complex relationships that make up decision-making power in the British executive. This debate is limited in part by the narrow definition of power. For the proponents of either thesis, power is conceived as an object that belongs to a particular actor or institutions. It is as if power is something like a tennis ball that volleys between the Prime Minister and the Cabinet. In fact, power is fluid; it ebbs and it flows. It is held jointly by the different actors in the Core Executive: the Prime Minister, the Cabinet, and the Civil Service. The actual decision-making occurs in the Cabinet and the committees; the Prime Minister exerts a great deal of influence on the whole system through authority and personnel management; the Civil Service also has its own circuits of influence through its monopoly on expertise and information. Ultimately, executive decision-making power does not lie anywhere. Instead, it is rests on the perpetual exchange of resources by the different actors according to context. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree UK Government & Parliamentary Studies essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically assess Rhodes' (1997) argument that 'Policy networks of resource dependent organisations are a ...

    3 star(s)

    One author that is extensively critical of Rhodes is Keith Dowding. Dowding (1995 p.137) argues that Rhodes claims to theorise about policy networks at the 'meso-level' when in actual fact the explanatory work is largely done at the 'micro-level.' He also expresses ideas that although the Rhodes policy network approach

  2. 'The domestic power of a UK Prime Minister exceeds the domestic power of a ...

    The Constitution states that the President must 'take care that laws are faithfully executed.'5 The office of President is an office of delegated powers and therefore '"executive power" must be understood as the power to execute faithfully the laws as they are adopted by Congress.'6 Although this does not necessarily

  1. Has power in Britain shifted significantly into the hands of unelected individuals in recent ...

    as a "machine for dissociating the see/being seen dyad". In the modern day with the boundaries between privacy and public interest being increasingly blurred the unelected power of the media has increased significantly by policing the acts of Parliament through what Foucault would see as a process of normalisation.

  2. Report on the Hunting Ban Act. This report aims to assess in great ...

    to 68 (The Guardian 2005 Appendix 1), and the forthcoming general election prevented the issue from going further. In 2002, the Labour government proposed another Hunting Bill, which caused the 'Liberty and Livelihood' march by the CA (Anderson 2006 p722), and despite passing through the Commons, the bill failed in the Lords.

  1. How successful is British Drug Policy?

    Coggans and McKellar (1994) have challenged notions of peer pressure arguing that young people select their peer groups based on their own aspirations and beliefs which may include groups which provides access to drug experiences. Simpson (2003) furthers this by adding that simplistic notions of peer pressure do not accurately represent the complex biographies given by some of his interviewees.


    Firstly one must bring forward the view that the House of Commons is not the only House in Parliament that provides a check on the executive, but rather the House of Lords also plays a role. The House of Lords is also arranged in adversarial fashion, yet the nobles in

  1. Free essay

    Decision Making- Gun Crime

    (www.homeoffice.gov.uk). Other measures include tough punishments for those who use other people to look after weapons and increased funding for community growth. Traffic officers, local police and armed response teams will be working together to identify and follow vehicles with a known connection to firearms.

  2. PC Debate

    eradicating inappropriate language but racist and sexist attitudes in society still remain. The Left Wing supporters of the Counter Ideology are likely to be influenced by social democratic, reformist or Marxist views. They believe the new right have successfully labelled those who support minority rights as extremists or na�ve do gooders.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work