• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who is to blame for crime: the individual or society?

Extracts from this document...


Student Number: 404896 Module Title: ASC103 - Criminology, Crime and Society Essay Title: 2/ Who is to blame for crime: the individual or society? With a big amount of criminal's records, people are now more concerning about the reason for committing crime. However, who should we blame for the increasing number of crimes? Is it the individual problems or social problems? Should we say it is people problems in society or people in problem society? According to Gottfredson and Hirschi, lack of self-control and a lack of individual responsibility are at the root of all criminal responsibility. (Gottfredson and Hirschi, 1990) However, social blame is the most popular explanative of poverty in nearly all of the twenty countries studied. (A. Freda, Gerhard O.W. Muller, William S. Laufer, 2007). The following essay is going to discuss about individual and social explanations of causing crime and hence, we might know more about who is to blame for crime. Individual and social are two main points in the causes of crimes. In individual explanation, family and personal causes are considered and it is defined as internal factors. In classicism, crime was believed to be the result of choice. People were thought to have free will so if they committed crimes; it was because they were bad and chose to break the law. External factors, which are also social explanation, are including government problems and society problems. Positivists believe that human behaviour is determined by external factors and we do not have free will. Both internal and external factors are important in analyzing the causes of crimes: most offenders committed crime is because of the external problems at the beginning. For example, X loses much money while gambling; X then develop a desperate need for money, because rent and other bills are due' other individuals refuse to lend X money; and X later robs someone. ...read more.


showed that better behaviour was associated with schools that develop collegial relations among adults and which bring teachers into frequent contact with other stuff and with students in settings other than the classrooms. (Watkins, C. et al., 2007) Therefore, lack of collaboration between school and family is another problem. School should have affiliate with family in order to know more about the students' background. For example, if a student is growing in a broken family and his father/mother is an offender, this student should have more cares from school in order to prevent going astray. In other words, education is also necessary in the process of reducing the number of crime as it provides the sense of right or wrong. Religion can be a factor affecting their choices as well. As religion have their own rules, those who believe in God will definitely obey the rules and the law as they can. According to Hirschi and Stark's (1969) "hellfire" hypothesis, a theory posits that religion deters criminal behaviour by increasing the costs of delinquency through the promise of punishment in the afterlife. (Heaton P., 2006) It does not means all of the offenders do not believe in God but it is less likely for them to commit crime if they are a religious believer. It is because they believe there is a high cost of committing crime and also they are supposed to have a good way on mind reposing and can manage to overcome emotional through religion. Moreover, caring from brothers and sisters in church would help them much by counselling or giving some advises as their thinking is more positive and aggressive; it would definitely help them from sadness or stress. ...read more.


Moreover, in some of the movies offenders do not arrested by the police, it seems that they do not have to take any responsibilities after committing crime but they can get what they want successfully. It is because the media does not necessarily provide an accurate portrayal of these events and it will focus its attention on crimes that are 'newsworthy'. (Peter Joyce, 2006)Hence, media become a push factor for them to commit crime. What is more, Government have great responsibilities on crimes. As citizens are restrained from acting on emotions and "throw away the key" sentiments when they believe that there are principles of punishment-legal proportionality, predictions of dangerousness, and responsiveness to treatment- that require governmental expertise. (Zimring, A. & Johnson, D., 2006) Government should consider is it the policy made them really uncomfortable on it and no other ways to solve their problems so they commit crime? Compare with both individual and social explanations of the causes of crime, I would agree that individual should be blame for crime. No doubt that there are so many causes in the society as well, however, it is individual's choices at the end. If it is really the society problems, why there is only a small amount of citizens committing crime rather than all of them? Moreover, they should have learnt that committing crime has a serious consequences, they should stand firm no matter what situations they are facing. Even though those social factors are affecting them but they should have self-control and self-concept of what they should do with their own situations. There should not be an excuse for them to commit crime. Therefore I would say society factors are not the most convincing, but individual. To prevent the number of crimes keep on increasing, we should understand more about the roots of causing crime in order to find out a suitable method in preventing. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Criminology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Criminology essays

  1. Compare positivist approaches to crime with at least two other perspectives discussed in the ...

    Therefore, people are fully responsible for their actions and consequently excuses are not acceptable. Its most prominent members, Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham, shared the idea that 'criminal behaviour could be understood and controlled as an outcome of a "human nature" shared by all of us' (Crime theory, Classical, 1998).

  2. 'Incapacitation is an effective way to reduce crime.' Discuss

    Some claimed the new law was responsible for the 'largest overall drop in crime over any four-year period in [California] history.' (Office of the Attorney General 1998). Zimring and Hawkins (1995) however assert that it only appears to have had the effect of incarcerating a larger proportion of burglars and thieves for longer periods.

  1. Domestic violence. The following essay will concentrate on patriarchal-terrorism (Gilchrist et al. 2004) meaning ...

    narcissistic-antisocial (2) schizoidal-borderline and (3) passive dependent-compulsive personality disorders. Similarly, Gondolf's (1988) cluster analysis separates sociopathic, antisocial and typical batterers. Referring to Megargee (1966), the study of Hershorn & Rosenbaum (1991) showed that over-controlled hostile men committed Domestic Violence less frequently, whereas under-controlled husbands tended to act more generally and frequently aggressively.

  2. Victimology. Domestic Violence

    Further, they argue that researchers and policy makers should pay little attention to violence perpetrated by women as it usually seen as a life saving reaction to a previous culmination of male violence (patriarchal terrorism). The data on which this proposition is derived comes from shelter samples of battered women (Johnson, 1995.

  1. PRISONS: AMERICAS CRIMINAL WAREHOUSES. Recent budget crises and the rapid increase of incarceration ...

    This case marked the end of the courts' hands-off policy regarding the administration of prisons. A couple years later, the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Johnson v. Avery gave prisoners the right to use jailhouse lawyers if they do not have adequate legal representation.

  2. Race Crime

    This variation is a result of several factors. Firstly, 54 percent of the black population of England and Wales live in London, and are therefore more likely to be stopped and searched than any other area. Secondly, 42 percent of all stop and searches are carried out by the Metropolitan Police Service, which only serve 14 percent of the whole population of England and Wales (MJ, 2010).

  1. Imprisonment should only be used as a last resort due to its long-term negative ...

    Anti-social behaviour has been highlighted as a consequence of parental incarceration (Kierkus and Baer, 2003). Family and parenting units are key predictors of criminal activity within the life-course (Farrington, 2002). As such, issues of fairness and legitimacy play a major role both within the institution and outside it (Liebling, 1999).

  2. What causes crime and deviance in society, biological or social factors?

    Brunner, H (1993). However, these studies also drew criticism from Meloy, 1988; Raine, (1993) who demonstrated a link between serotonin levels and aggression. ?This alone is not sufficient to unequivocally prove that individuals are genetically predetermined to be violent, but it is of importance toward understanding offenders and possible causes

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work