• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why do Arab Islamic countries hate the United States?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Running head: WHY DO ARAB ISLAMIC COUNTRIES HATE WHY DO ARAB ISLAMIC COUNTRIES HATE THE UNITED STATES? Chris Eggleton Marshall University Abstract Conflict in the Middle East has reigned since biblical times. An escalation in violence has been seen since the 1900's . With the emergence of the United States as a competing and lone super power, alterations in the status quo can be traced directly and indirect to United States influence. Exploration of three major areas will be explored. WHY DO ARAB ISLAMIC COUNTRIES HATE THE UNITED STATES? Why do Arab Islamic countries hate us? That is a question that has been asked many times since September 11th, 2001. The fact is that this did not happen over night. This problem has been escalating for hundreds of years depending on the point of view. Some scholars say the hated began with the Christian Crusades in the year 1095. Other sources point to the ongoing conflict between the Arabs and Israelis, in which the United States backs Israel. These are just some of the ever growing reasons that Arab Islamic countries hate the United States. There are three main points of focus when one researches this topic. First and foremost is foreign policy. This would include the war for Palestine as well as the war on terrorism that the United States now wages. Secondly, religion plays the next major role in the hatred for the United States. Religion would include the war for Palestine, as well as the current beliefs system versus the United States beliefs system. Third, capitalism is a major reason for the hated towards the United States. Lastly, could the lines between two or more of these be blurred into one? Foreign Policy plays the single most reason for the Arab Islamic hatred for the United States. The main point of interest is the war for Palestine. "This is the reason many Arab's hate Americans." ...read more.

Middle

Many historians refrain from telling the story but the common answer is men rode horses with blood to the knees. This all took place during the first crusade. The second crusade took place between 1147 and 1149, this was lead by King Louis VII. This crusade turned out to be an utter failure in which one of the Latin Kingdoms was lost. The third crusade lasted from 1188 to 1192. This crusade was ordered by Pope Gregory VIII due to the failure of the second. The fourth crusade began in 1202 and ended in the year 1204. Constantinople was destroyed during this crusade. The fifth crusade lasted from 1217 to 1221. This one brought the defeat of Damietta. The sixth crusade was between the years of 1228 and 1229. The seventh and final crusade was led by Louis IX, and lasted from 1248 to 1250. One should be able to conclude that after years and years of crusades to the land of Jerusalem, that Muslim hatred over religion began there. The author of this paper has never read the Koran, but did find articles on the internet that claim the Koran carries passages that tell Muslims never to accept Jews or Christians as friends. Instead it tells to kill the infidels. It instructs Muslims to cut Jews and Christians heads and fingertips off. This does not sound like a very friendly religion. Many Arab Islamic countries feel that another turn of Crusades is coming with the Bush administration. This is being taught in some universities in the Middle East. According to Abdul Mohammad, a neighbor of this author, this is untrue. Abdul does admit that Muslims are not allowed to drink alcohol, smoke cigarettes or marijuana. They are also not allowed to view pornography in any form. This means no Cinemax, no magazines, or DVD's. Abdul admits that all of these have been tried since coming to the United States. ...read more.

Conclusion

The leading cleric also feels that Muqtada just wants a major role in the new Iraq. Although, it seems that it would not be much of a change for the people of Iraq. Muqtada also claims to be a descendent of the profit Muhammad. Muqtada even lays out a family tree for followers to see that he is "chosen." Muqtada also creates discontent throughout the Shi'ite population about the U.S occupation. Muqtada blames the breakdown of security, and the disruption of public services. It also does not hinder his master plan that he provides good meals and drink for those who follow him. Muqtada is trying to turn Iraq back into what it was hundreds of years ago. Maintaining that women must wear veils and be subservient to men. Muqtada has even gone as far as to set up illegal courts across the towns that he controls to try and convict people who challenge him. This all together is a dangerous situation. Seemingly through research a big part of the problem would be solved by either removing support all together to Israel or to give equal support to both sides. Not all Arab Islamic countries have a stake in that part of the Middle East, but most know someone or knew someone who has fought in that battle. Islam teaches one for all and all for one. If one member of the religion is attacked then the entire religion must stand up for those being attacked. This might be the reason for the rise in suicide bombings around the world. At any rate someone has to give. The Arab Islamic countries cannot continue to believe that it can force Islam onto American or any other nation. American made need to rethink it's stance towards the problem in Palestine. Then again why should the United States rethink its position when places like Palestine and Pakistan continue to breed terrorist? Maybe this is an issue that should be looked into. Promising governments more aid money for turning over terrorist. I firmly believe that some places would rather keep their terrorist than help America. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Relations section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Relations essays

  1. Argentina's Dirty War

    the subversion" Since Argentina's labor movement was the foundation of the Peronista Party, workers from the trade union was one the main targets of this campaign. Any demands for social or economic change coming from these groups, were interpreted as the inner workings of a communist scheme.

  2. When, if ever, should states interfere in each other's internal affairs?

    It shall be concluded that little can be done to resolve this dilemma given the current state of international relations and international organisations, notably the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). Consequently, while this essay suggests when and why states can interfere in each other's affairs, it recognises that the practical application of such a theory is unlikely.

  1. Intelligence does not win wars. It does not shape foreign policy. Intelligence does not ...

    Talking about the American Intelligence-policy connection, Richard N. Haass, Director for policy planning staff in the Department of State says, "Intelligence is knowledge and analysis designed to assist action. Information and insights that do not "assist action" remain lifeless. Successful intelligence, therefore, requires a mutual understanding between policymakers and the Intelligence Community that is all too often lacking.

  2. An initial statement on your choice of case study: Why have you chosen that ...

    serve the state but the state should serve to the people- otherwise the state might realise what a destructive weapon masses are. Also I have changed my opinion about revolution. Firstly, I thought it was something that happens in a day.

  1. How successful was the 'New Deal'?

    If the new deal was intended to a radical, ambitious and solve all the problems that it could, then success was, at best, limited. Biblography David E. Hamilton, Problems in American civilisation: The New deal (Houghton Mifflin: Boston, 1999) John Major, The New Deal, (Longmans: London, 1974)

  2. How do liberals try to explain why democracies rarely fight each other, and which ...

    Despite the colonial rivalries between Britain and France, the crisis in Fashoda in 1898 was resolved peacefully, and later, before the First World War in 1914, they together formed an alliance against illiberal Germany. Later during the same war, Italy, a liberal state which had initially joined an alliance with

  1. What international factors, with particular reference to the United States, have accounted for the ...

    and both states pitted against non-state actors have engaged in numerous conflicts of varying intensity and gravity. However the resulting underlying pattern of these various conflicts has remained constant; Kashmir is still a region where two South Asian states are locked into zero-sum antagonism over which little significant bilateral progress towards resolution has been made.

  2. What are the main differences between classical realists and neorealists? Why did most realists ...

    search for Osama bin Laden, and the movement against the Taliban in Afghanistan (Schmidt & Williams 2008, p. 202). The invasion of Iraq through a military campaign was never seen as practical and realistic as there were no active threats targeted towards the national interests of the United States.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work