• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why is the single currency so important? Discuss with relation to issues of economic and political union.

Extracts from this document...


Why is the single currency so important? Discuss with relation to issues of economic and political union. The introduction of the single European currency on 1st January 1999 represented, without doubt, a revolution in the way economic matters of Europe are managed. The economies of Belgium, Germany, Greece, Spain, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, Austria, Portugal and Finland are now to a large extent harmonized under the one common currency, the Euro. Never before has such a project been undertaken uniting currencies and cultures alike. As deepening and widening of the European Union (EU) continues at a rapid pace, how does the single currency fit into the aims and goals of the European Council, and more importantly the aspirations of European citizens? Why is the success Euro crucial to the EU's long term stability and longevity? What political opposition exists towards the importance of the Euro as a driving force for further political integration? It is these questions that this essay seeks to address, providing political and economic reasoning in support of my arguments. Economically speaking, the introduction of the Euro was primarily designed to create a more stable European economy. Indeed, it was set out clearly in the Maastricht Treaty of 1992 as the underpinnings of all the European Commission's financial objectives for the single currency1. As Temperton describes2, these wishes were directly related the economic decline during the 1970's and 80's, where economies weakened across Europe, which were largely related to fluctuating oil prices worldwide. ...read more.


Davidson6 puts forward a pro-integration perspective by describing states within the Euro as having a stronger political position in Europe for future political policy making. He goes on to describe monetary union as a heavily political step rather than purely economical initiative, and blames the UK for taking such a cynical stance. Davidson suggests that further integration would primarily run on financial lines as political issues such as common defence and security carry a more heated atmosphere. Indeed, there is much to be said for this perspective. For instance, it would be logical to assume that monetary integration is somewhat of a forerunner to further integration politically and gives added weight to the concept of a 'United States of Europe' being realised at some future point. If success is achieved, this could provide the green light for more far reaching measures that are at present taboo subjects by providing evidence that integration can work. The Euro is effective in doing this by creating common ground for participating states across Europe. This takes form in many different ways. For example, assuming that political integration between states is possible, European citizens simply having a single currency across a large number of key states allows for easier price comparison7. This relatively small incentive goes a long way to furthering the feeling of integration between Europe's citizens of different countries. ...read more.


Clearly, the Euro has a great deal of invested interest and importance. The member states are risking large political and economic stakes. The Euro's success can only carry them forward to greater unity between European states; however, its failure could result in a collapse of the vision for Europe many have invested the last five decades in. A great deal hangs in the balance. 1 Taken from ideas put forward in, D Begg, J Genvon Hagen, C Wyplosz, K F Zimmermann, EMU: Prospects and Challenges for the Euro, Norwich UK, Page Bros, 1998, page 67. 2 P. Temperton, The Euro (2nd Edition), New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1999, page 7. 3 D. Begg, J. Genvon Hagen, C. Wyplosz, K. F. Zimmermann, EMU: Prospects and Challenges for the Euro, Norwich UK, Page Bros, 1998, page 67. 4 H.M. Scobile, European Monetary Union - The Way Forward , 5 P. Temperton, The Euro (2nd Edition), New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1999, page 4. 6 J. Arrowsmith, Thinking the unthinkable about EMU, Coping with turbulence between 1998 and 2002, London, Latimer Trend & Co Ltd, 1998. 7 P. Temperton, The Euro (2nd Edition), New York, John Wiley & Sons, 1999, page 7. 8 http://www.no-euro.com/whatwebelieve/case.asp, accessed on Wednesday 12th February 2003. 9 T. Risse, D. Engelmann-Martin, H-J. Knopf, K. Roscher, To Euro or Not to Euro? The EMU and Identity Politics in the European Union Vol 5, Sage Publications, 2003. Stable URL: http://dandini.cranfield.ac.uk/vl=10029608/cl=118/nw=1/rpsv/~4093/v5n2/s1/p147 Chris Dunderdale, Pendle College - Politics 104 - Lena Karamanidou, 24th February 2003 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree International Politics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)


This is a good essay - at my Russell Group University it would probably gain a low 2.1 (as a first year essay). The major things it's missing are a consideration of a) the historical context of EMU (the snake, EMS etc), b) the political-economic costs and benefits (loss of monetary autonomy and why in the context of EMS this wasn't seen as a loss) and the Franco-German relationship. All of these factors explain why 'stability' - the factor the author's latched onto - is so important.

Nonetheless this is internally cohesive and mostly factually correct, which is a good start for a first year EU essay!

Marked by teacher Grace Thomas 26/03/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree International Politics essays

  1. How effective is international law?

    For example, the United Nations action in Kuwait was most likely not to do with sovereignty, but upholding economy based on oil. This is obviously an American interest. Another example is China. China holds sovereignty very dear. This is due to their Human Rights records. Especially with regards to Tibet.

  2. What are the major strength and weakness of realist tradition?

    When this happen the states often find themselves unable to enhance their security even after building up the military capabilities.

  1. Are states still the most powerful actors in global politics?

    A non-state actor, such as an NGO, cannot be a dominant actor in global politics if not informed in some aspects of international relations. Susan Strange's book, The Retreat of the State, argues that "the territorial boundaries of states

  2. The game of Risk can be used as tool to understand the international system. ...

    The balance of power produced stable "spheres of influence" because of flexible alliances, countering threatening advances wherever necessary. The status quo was preserved, for "the pattern of relations among the actors tends to curb the ambitions or the opportunities of the chief rivals and to preserve an approximate equilibrium."12 None

  1. What were the main forces promoting globalisation in the late 20th century? How different ...

    The second half of the nineteenth century saw a key macro invention in the steam engine, which helped to reduce the cost of ocean-freight by two-thirds while increasing the speed of transport between 1870 and 1900 (Lewis, 1977). Furthermore, the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 halved the distance

  2. Alliance Formation and the Balance of World Power.

    This marginal argument and the rest of the article can be mutually exclusive. The commentary uses the ideas of the main body of the article, but they do not rely on one another. Logic - How well does the author present his case?

  1. Compare the role of interest and pressure groups in the UK, France and Russia.

    In contrast, promotional groups are set up to advance shared values and beliefs. They can be split into insider and outsider groups. Insider groups have strong links with the decision makers within government and are regularly consulted. This means that they can gain access to the decision makers and put forward their case directly.

  2. Is Media the fourth branch of power? Discuss.

    form in which we know it at present),the nowadays situation in Britain and in contrast to previous three an example from non-democratic part of the world - thoughts and actions of the head of the Soviet Union-Lenin. 2.1 Lippmann and his Public Opinion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work