• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

With specific reference to the work of the Chicago school, discuss whether areas are prone to criminality because of their residents or are those areas naturally criminogenic?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

With specific reference to the work of the Chicago school, discuss whether areas are prone to criminality because of their residents or are those areas naturally criminogenic? The work of the Chicago school during the period from the 1910's to the 1930's has become some of the most influential work surrounding area based criminology. This paper will discuss the work of the Chicago school, and examine whether high crime areas are more prone to criminality due to their inhabitants, or are the areas themselves naturally criminogenic. The Chicago sociologists focused particularly on the invasion by business interests of the innermost residential areas around the central business districts of cities. This created what they called the zone of transition. As the inner city became less attractive to residents, those who could move out did so, leaving an area of decline occupied by the poor, and by marginal and deviant groups. As prominent member of the Chicago school, Robert Park stated: "It is assumed that people living in natural areas of the same general type and subject to the same general conditions, will display, on the whole, the same characteristics" Park (1952) The work of Charles Murray will be utilised as an example of how areas may be subject to social breakdown and an increase in the incidence of criminal behaviour, Murray wrote extensively on the emergence of an 'underclass' within the working class population. ...read more.

Middle

It is argued that there are an increasing number of people, within the working class, who could well be classified as belonging to the underclass. The term underclass relates mainly to those people who make no effort to work or look after themselves. These people prefer to live off the state rather than having to work, and have a tendency to either be criminal themselves or associate frequently with criminals. For example Chiricos (1987) finds in his review, very strong evidence that unemployment is positively correlated with crime, in particular property crimes, although results are stronger for studies in the 1970's than in earlier periods. It is especially important to remember that the term underclass refers only to those groups of poor people who make no effort to help themselves. The people who put forward this explanation accept that there are poor people who are in this state through no 'fault' of their own. Further to Charles Murray's work surrounding the underclass, Albert Cohen, has argued that class difference, especially amongst juveniles may increase the incidence of area based crimes. Albert Cohen (1955) was one of the first sociologists to offer an alternative and more sophisticated explanation of class differences, which attempts to explain apparently motiveless crimes among juvenile delinquents in that often articles of little or no value are stolen, and crimes which are apparently committed simply for the thrill of it. ...read more.

Conclusion

The case for shifting the focus of attention to the area becomes markedly stronger when attention moves to people who are not themselves poor. Living in a poor area can act to their detriment. It happens, for example, through the lack of community resources, the increased competition for places in the labour market, and the effect of stigmatisation on command over resources. Further, people who live in such areas are less secure than others. The fear of crime is directly associated with perceptions of the physical deterioration of an area (Painter, 1992, p.182), but the problems are not simply a matter of perception. People who are on higher incomes in lower income areas have greater vulnerability to crime than people elsewhere, including burglary, robbery, motor vehicle theft and vandalism (Evans, 1992, pp 42-46). These people are not likely to be made poor in consequence - that would happen only if the effect of living in the area was to bring their level of resources down sufficiently to consider them as deprived - but anyone in this position has lower resources, other things being equal, than others who have desirable, well-maintained environments. The implication of these arguments is plain: where one lives does affect one's command over resources. If this is right, then areas do affect poverty and therefore the incidence of crime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Theory section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Theory essays

  1. 1 Outline and discuss the difference between positivism and neopositivism. Discuss this with reference ...

    the findings of sociology can be adequately understood simply in terms of comparisons with natural science, as feelings, etc. can have a great effect on how we react to things. For example, if somebody feels they are being scrutinized or forced into something in some way, chances are they will react differently to how they normally would.

  2. To what extent, therefore, has current Labour Government Policy successful tackled the issue of ...

    Soon after entry into Government in 1997, Labour were faced with a declining investment fund, which stood at £1.5 billion, seen as a consequence of previous static investment planning; when questioned about the efficiency of capital spending in September 1997 one Local Authority responded 'the system does not allow for

  1. Examine issues around social exclusion and teenage pregnancy.

    The conservatives denied poverty existed, so why is there a need for a welfare state and where is the emerging underclass. Labour said that it is just a lack of means to work that causes poverty, thus justifying the need for a welfare state and acknowledging the `underclass` exists.

  2. How to design a research project

    TWO - IS THE STUDY OF BEHAVIOUR LOGICALLY DIFFERENT TO THE STUDY OF THE NATURAL WORLD? - One View. We can understand behaviour through observation. From Hume to say A causes B is to say A's always follow B's. (Methodological)

  1. This essay is aim to explain the strength and the weakness of sub-cultural theory ...

    They take the observer's values as obvious and 'normal' and they castigate other people's values as not meaningful alternatives but a lack of value, meaning and rationality. In contrast sub-cultural theory would argue that human behaviour is fundamentally meaningful and differences in behaviour represent the different problems and solutions to these problems which particular subcultures have evolved.

  2. Discuss both the 'how' and 'why' of addiction, focusing on the main models that ...

    is to be defined by the appearance of a distinct abstinence syndrome, thereby equating the notion of addiction strictly with physical dependency. He argues how all too often, continued and compulsive use is equated in many observers' minds with addiction, and no effort is made to distinguish between addiction, i.e.

  1. The issue of corporate crime i.e. why businessmen as opposed to the working class ...

    corporate crime a combination of all approaches used by the 'social sciences' need to be used. This includes a multi-discipline approach (sociology, psychology and criminology) focusing on combining the socio-psychological approaches with the structural approaches advocated by criminologists, in order, to gain a greater understanding as to why people commit corporate crime.

  2. With a focus on gender or race, discuss whether the criminal justice system is ...

    Women who are sent to prison often receive shorter sentences than men which does imply that women are treated more leniently (Heidensohn, 2002). Some authors state that the chivalry hypothesis becomes not so relevant if the crimes committed are the same, and sentencing varies very little between the sexes.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work