• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

HEALTH LAW AND POLICY

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

HEALTH LAW AND POLICY Assessment Two Introduction Being a patient under the care of a doctor is probably the only occasion where an individual unconditionally places their welfare in the hands of another. However, not everything goes according to plan - sometimes the unexpected happens and things go wrong. It is often assumed that complaints to some form of statutory Health Ombudsman are an effective mechanism not only to resolve individuals' complaints, but also to improve the overall quality of health care (Paterson, 2001). In this assignment I will discuss the laws and legislations that are relevant to Case 00HDC00835. Secondly, I will examine the impact of law and the accountability of Health Practitioners. Thirdly, I will investigate the legal issues raised from the complaints of the patient, and the patient's family. I will pay attention to some of the issues that frequently challenge the elderly population. I will also attempt to identify some policy considerations that are specific to this case. Finally, I will form my own opinion of whether decisions made by the Health and Disability Commissioner struck a fair equilibrium. Other comments will be raised for examination. Law and the Tensions that Arise The law of torts is defined as a "civil wrong". It is concerned with those situations where the conduct of one person causes harm to another (Todd, 1997). A primary function of the law of torts - in particular the tort of negligence - is to compensate for damage caused by personal injury (Todd, 1997). Health Practitioners in New Zealand are largely protected from the "no fault" Accident Compensation Scheme (ACC), which reduces practitioners chances of being sued in court. ...read more.

Middle

Research shows that one of the most important factors in healing is the blood supply to the tissues. In some patients, it is recommended to try a limited amputation if there is a chance of healing, but to be prepared to proceed to a major amputation if healing doesn't take place. This in my view is what Dr C did. Unfortunately, there is no test that can predict in every patient whether healing will take place, and it is a matter of surgical judgment and experience whether a wound will heal or not (NZ Society Vascular Surgery, 2004). Under the circumstances, Dr C overruled the considered opinion of Mrs A, probably because he felt that she was not 'lucid enough' to make the right decision at the time. Instead Dr C took the utilitarian approach or acted on paternalism for the best interest of his patient (i.e. on the assumption that doctor knows best). Utilitarianism is primarily concerned with the "greatest good for the greatest number" and because of this, reflects the wants and desires of society (Gillon, 1992). Utilitarianism can face many criticism, e.g. if the majority of people always have their way then the minority will always be left out and will not be given a fair chance (Corey, 1993). Dr C's approach went against her, therefore she lost her autonomy. The communication level between Dr G (registrar) and Dr C could be improved, e.g. even though it was Dr C's responsibility for performing the surgery, he could have involved Dr G (who probably assisted with the operation) ...read more.

Conclusion

be considered, whereby a family member should have been a support backup in case the patient was not fully alert under the circumstances. Did the Commissioner strike a fair balance? In this case, the Commissioner should have looked beyond Rights 6 and 7. There were obvious communication fractures which the Commissioner ignored. Right 5 - Dr C should have ascertained whether Mrs A was in a position to communicate with him, and, if so, advised Mrs A of what options were available. If Mrs A's condition prevented her from communicating, then her family should have been communicated with, as they would have carried out her wishes. Even after the surgery, Dr C did not facilitate effective communication as to why he performed BKA, therefore in my opinion Mrs A's right to effective communication was breached. Right 4 -Services of an appropriate standard could have been breached by the surgeon and overlooked by the Commissioner. Mrs A's family felt that Dr C did not provide her with reasonable care and skill. The doctor failed to provide services (e.g. therapist, counselor) in order to assist Mrs A mentally, for surgery. I also believe the Commissioner should source other legislations or Acts apart from the CHDCSR. Conclusion There are many categories of law which may impact upon doctors but, as a general rule, the principles applied by the courts to date in civil proceedings have come principally from the law of negligence and contract (Skene, 1998). Too often we hear 'doctor knows best'. I think reasonable care challenges this view, because it argues for patient involvement in medical decision-making, and it critically examines approaches based on the assertion of patients' legal rights. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Healthcare section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Healthcare essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Unit 10 care practice and provision

    3 star(s)

    he will feel as if he has choices and is not forced against his will. Also by using the preventive and treatment approach, which will include giving Johnny a controlled healthy diet, which he will have choice over by providing Johnny with a variety of different meals , also Johnny

  2. Medicine is the science and art of healing. Medicine is a science because it ...

    In the United States, Thomas Starzl and F. D. Moore implanted livers in 1963. In the same year, J. D. Hardy performed a lung graft. Research has been carried out into methods of preventing organ rejection, and methods of preserving donor organs in a viable condition until they can be implanted.

  1. Professional Autonomy and Accountability in Radiography

    White and McKay (2002) show that radiographers have been actively developing their roles over the past decade and are participating in arenas which were mainly for radiologists e.g. red dot schemes. (White and McKay 2002; Karagozoglu 2008). Technological advancements, such as Doppler sonography; videoscopic surgical techniques, interventional techniques and PACS

  2. The business I have chosen to study is Nab wood School in Cottingley Manor ...

    The involvement of the safety adviser and relevant line/functional management at the planning/design stage. (j) The provision of the means to deal with failures in order to meet job requirements. (k) The fixing of accountability for the management of health and safety in a similar manner to other management functions.

  1. The aim of this assignment is to critically evaluate the biopsychosocial perspectives and influences ...

    in practice as it is thought to take too long to apply to a patients' situation resulting in the model not being applied effectively. For a patient centred approach and for the model to be used effectively also depends on the patient and their outcome of what they want from

  2. Literature Review and Case study on CBT

    or danger against the underestimation of ability to cope, treatment would take the form of a realistic evaluation of what Joe perceives as threatening. For example the fear of negative evaluation by friends, and work towards increasing his skill levels around coping with this threat, for example using graded exposure.

  1. Euthanasia - an analysis of the theories and principles which guide healthcare practice and ...

    It means the duty to do good. Non-maleficence requires you not to harm patients intentionally. In treatment decisions at the end of life the dilemma in applying these principles often revolves around what course of action will promote the patient's best interests.

  2. I will discuss and identify a nursing skill whilst on placement. The nursing skill ...

    Regulations 2007?. The risk assessments were carried out and the patients? health and safety was the main concern at all times. I was wearing gloves and washed my hands before and after the task at all times to ensure that cross-contamination is prevented and hygiene is promoted * I put the bed

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work