What are Interpersonal Skills and how to they relate with Communication Skills?
The literature is unclear and ambiguous about how communication and interpersonal skills overlap with each other. Upon interpretation, the two skills are linked very closely: Whilst communication skills are the portrayal of a message verbal and/or non-verbally, interpersonal skills are the techniques used by a healthcare professional to develop a therapeutic relationship (Oxford Dictionary, 2007, p547; Dougherty and Lister, 2008, p54). An interpersonally skilled professional is having the knowledge and experience to help relieve a distress, by looking at client’s personal attributes and circumstances to know what communication technique to use (Anglia Ruskin University, 2011b, see Appendix A, section 10; Morrisey and Callaghan, 2011, p1; Burnard, 1996 p45). In other words, in order to create a meaningful therapeutic relationship, Reynolds (2009, p313) states that in mental healthcare, professionals needs to sensitively observe patients and interpret those observations to base their own interpersonal actions.
According to Bach and Grant (2010, p13), well-practised communication techniques are ineffective if the idea of the interpersonal connection goes unacknowledged. To put it simply, ‘Good interpersonal skills are what each mental health nurse needs to make nursing happen’ (Morrisey, and Callaghan, 2011, p1).Yet there is little nursing research discussing interpersonal skills, whereas there is copious amounts investigating the use of communication (Bach and Grant, 2010, p13; Jones, 2007). This has made me consider whether you can effectively communicate, assess a client with a mental health problem, without the use of interpersonal skills. Simpson (1991, p1) agrees stating without a therapeutic relationship, the dynamics of assessing a patient’s needs, feelings, attitudes and beliefs in a holistic and empowering way would be ineffective (Simpson, 1991, p1).
Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations
Peplaus’s Model of Interpersonal Relations (1952 cited in Forchuck, 1994) is designed to assist nurses in the understanding of a successful and nurturing nurse-patient relationship. The theory of interpersonal nursing is a four stage model which incorporates the patient experience and supporting a service user through the dynamics of their health, rather than a patient’s internal pathology (Hrabe, 2005; Simpson, 1991, p3). It starts with the orientation of the caring environment for example, in an acute setting showing a patient where their room is and helps ease anxiety about being in a new situation (Simpson, 1991, p10-11).
Forchuck (1994) investigated using a quantitative approach, the orientation phase in nurse-patient dyads. A quantitative study is the scientific approach to nursing research. The main aim is to collect numerical data to test relationships, differences and cause and effect interactions between variables (LoBiondo and Haber, 2010, p584; Getliffe, 1999 p112). Forchuck (1994) set out to test a number of hypotheses and to research them to demonstrate cause and effect. The researcher reported that variables being measured that would directly affect the nurse-client relationhship. These consisted of preconceptions of the nurse and client; positive interpersonal relationships and anxiety levels. After statistical analysis, they found that client’s preconceptions of the nurse were significantly predictive, according to p-value of statistical significance (Godshall, 2009, p80-81). Whereas the nurse’s preconceptions of the client were the most predictive value (Forchuck, 1994), however, this was unreliable according the p-value of statistical significance (Godshall, 2009, p80-81).
Forchuck’s research (1994) gives insight into the nurse-client relationship and how the public may view nurses. Taking into account that the research highlighted the client’s preconceptions of the nurse as a confounding factor in the interpersonal relations, this adds emphasis to a nurse’s non-verbal communication and acting in a professional manner.
Forming a Therapeutic Relationship
Mobile technology has developed significantly over the last ten years and has been increasingly utilised in monitoring health outcomes and delivery of health intervention. Therefore, mobile phones are important in encouraging nurse-client communication and therapeutic relationship (Blake, 2008). Hazelwood (2008) agrees, stating that the use of mobile phone text messaging was a useful communication tool. A nurse and client exchanging in text messaging conversations contributed and encouraged self- expression and self-reflection from clients, which facilitated a more trustworthy therapeutic relationship. According to Hazelwood (2008), alongside therapy and other nursing interventions to care for people suffering with mental health problems, text messaging helps clients open up to new treatment possibilities and can assist with clients’ lack of confidence to talk about their issues.
Hart (2010) disagrees, however, declaring that “text messaging is the antithesis of interpersonal relationships” and the purpose of a therapeutic relationship is to interact with one another. According to Hart (2010) text messaging undermines Peplau’s theory of interpersonal relations (1952 cited in Forchuck, 1994) because interpersonal skill requires a two way communication between nurse and client, as well as immediate response of non-verbal an individual communicates. This can only be provided by face-to-face interaction (Hart, 2010). In my opinion, although Hart (2010) provides a reasoned argument of the disadvantages of the use of text messaging, as a nurse you should respect the way an individual chooses to communicate.
Coatsworth-Puspoky, Forchuk & Ward-Griffin (2006) conducted a study to collect qualitative data to find out the client’s perspective of the nursing process. This means they used a discovery-orientated approach, to focus on how nurses’ social interaction is interpreted, understood and experienced by the service user (Barroso, 2010, p86). Coatsworth-Puspoky, Forchuk & Ward-Griffin (2006) used semi- structured interviews and an ethnographic design to collect data, from both an inpatient and community setting, in more interactive and less controlled way to uncover details about therapeutic relationships. This is one of the advantages of qualitative research during the data collection process; it allows the researcher to rely on insights found whilst, for example, interviewing participants to guide the course of further data collection (Wallace, 2008, p125).
There is little dispute that the therapeutic relationship between nurse and client is pivotal to high quality care (Hurley and Linsley, 2006). Gilburt, Rose and Slade (2008) found similar results to Coatsworth-Puspoky, Forchuk & Ward-Griffin (2006), looking more specifically at the importance of relationships when caring for people with acute mental health problems. The design method was also comparable, as they used semi- structured interviews to collect qualitative data. The sample of participants for this study consisted of 19 service users who had been admitted to an acute ward in England. The process of sampling was conducted on a volunteer basis, to empower participants and take into account the power imbalance involved in the research process (Gilburt, Rose and Slade, 2008). Sampling is the term given to the process of selecting participants that represent the population of interest, such as people suffering with mental health problems, which enables the researcher to make valid interpretations and generalisations (Haber, 2010, p585; Wallace, 2008, p538).
The results of both studies found similar themes. Clients that were acutely unwell sought a nurse who was sincere, caring, approachable, trustworthy, a good listener and smiled to provide a sense of safety and reassurance (Anglia Ruskin University, 2011b, see Appendix A, section 23; Gilburt, Rose and Slade, 2008; Coatsworth-Puspoky, Forchuk & Ward-Griffin, 2006). Simpson (1991, p6) states that in Peplau’s theory (1952 cited in Forchuck, 1994) that a prerequisite to a successful caring relationship is a nurse to be warm and skilled at what she does. Papastarrou Efstathiou and Charalambous (2010) agree, in regards to their research, they found that service users highly regard a nurse who is competent and capable in doing nursing tasks. This idea was reiterated this in Gilburt, Rose and Slade’s study (2008), stating that listening in a way that was open, non-judgmental and not patronising was rated highest by service users. This demonstrated that the nurses valued and respected them and as a consequence were more willing and able to accept advice and information (Gilburt, Rose and Slade, 2008).
There were also differences in results from the two studies, despite in the similar methodology. Gilburt, Rose and Slade (2008) reported about service users’ experiences being sectioned under the Mental Health Act (2007). Clients mentioned lack of freedom and how this led some experiences feeling like they were being coerced. This often had a negative effect on therapeutic relationships being formed because it was perceived to be a lack of listening and understanding from the nursing staff. According to Peplau’s ideas of Interpersonal Relations (1952 cited in Forchuck, 1994), illness is a learning experience which is a two-way process, the nurse learns from the client and client learns from the nurses, which leads to them both developing and maturing as people. This process of maturation requires a significant understanding of the interpersonal process (Anglia Ruskin University, 2011b, see Appendix A, section 13, 24 and 35; Simpson, 1991, p2 and p8). This made me consider, whether you can form a therapeutic relationship without listening and showing a service user understanding.
In contrast to the positive relationships describe Gilburt, Rose and Slade (2008) and Coatsworth-Puspoky, Forchuk & Ward-Griffin, 2006, clients stated that a dissatisfying relationship consisted of a power and control imbalance; coercion, mistrust, using medical terminology to label clients; being ignored and a focus only pathology of an illness (Gilburt, Rose and Slade, 2008;Coatsworth-Puspoky, Forchuk & Ward-Griffin, 2006).
These two studies emphasises the need for good interpersonal skills because the communication skills involved in these interactions was effective at portraying a particular message. It is the use of interpersonal skills, for example self-awareness (Anglia Ruskin University, 2011b, see Appendix A, section 7), that determined whether client perceived the relationship as a positive or negative outcome. Simpson (1991, p2) agrees with this, stating that according to Peplau’s theory of Interpersonal Nursing (1952 cited in Forchuck, 1994)in order for a therapeutic relationship to progress, a nurse needs to have a clear understanding of dynamics of interpersonal communication. Reynolds (2009, p314) supports this idea commenting that it the gaps in development of intellectual and interpersonal competencies that lead to unhealthy social interaction and poor health outcomes, such as the obstacles described in both studies by Coatsworth-Puspoky, Forchuk & Ward-Griffin (2006) and Gilburt, Rose & Slade (2008).
Salzmann-Erikson and Eriksson (2005) supports Reynolds (2009, p314) with their study investigating the use of therapeutic touch with people suffering psychosis. Service users stated that if the therapeutic relationship was good, therapeutic touch was perceived as warm and compassionate, creating a sense of security. Whilst the researchers found that if the therapeutic relationship was underdeveloped, the behaviour emphasised feelings of inferiority and oppression.
This study highlighted the importance of considering the ethical implications of conducting a piece of research. Ethics is the discipline asking how morally justifiable a person actions are (Sommers- Flanagan and Sommers-Flanagan, 2007, p4). This is important for clinical practice because as nurses we must protect individuals in our care from harm and act as an advocate (NMC, 2008, p 2-3) Salzmann-Erikson and Eriksson (2005) reported that basic ethical guidelines such informed consent and right to withdraw were upheld in the duration of the study. However, the researchers were asking vulnerable participants to discuss feelings of inferiority and oppression. It is debatable whether this could be considered as deliberate harm and therefore unethical research to investigate. Barker and Buchanan-Barker (2009, p13) discuss how one of the fundamental things about being caring is to ‘Do No Harm’ and whether if we do cause psychological or physical pain, is it beneficial to a service user. This idea emphasises the use of interpersonal skills to make a decision about using therapeutic touch.
Simpson (2009, p404) states that to create a helping relationship that nurtures the recovery of a patient, it is important to develop a therapeutic caring environment. Alexander’s research (2006) aimed to discover the impact of rules in a therapeutic care environment by collecting qualitative data and comparing two acute psychiatric wards and how this impacts nurse–patient relationships. The researcher found that it is important to have therapeutic context for rule enforcement, negotiation with patients about contents of rules and the rationale for their existence could lead to higher levels of therapeutic engagement. This idea can be applied to ideas of treating patients as individuals and recognising that patient’s contribution to their own care (NMC, 2008, p3).
Alexander (2006) suggests in his research that patients should be given a clear set of rules as a part of the admissions process. This would relate to the orientation phase of Peplau’s theory of interpersonal relations (1952 cited in Forchuck, 1994). According to Simpson (1991, p10-11) the orientation phase is about easing anxiety and creating a safe environment. Upon interpretation Alexander’s suggestion in his research (2006) would help implement this; however healthcare professionals need to be aware about appearing too authoritative. Forchuck (1994) suggests service users’ perspective of a nurse will impact on the therapeutic relationship formed and other research suggests that a nurse should concentrate on appearing sincere, caring, approachable (Gilburt, Rose and Slade, 2008; Coatsworth-Puspoky, Forchuk & Ward-Griffin, 2006).
Peplau’s theory (1952 cited in Forchuck, 1994) perceived the positive outcomes of care for patients were the result of as a developing, trusting relationship (Simpson, 1991, p2). However according to Hem, Heggen and Ruyter (2008) there is a higher prevalence of distrust with acutely unwell patients. They collected empirical evidence, using observation and transcribed interview as a data collection method, to analyse how this could be improved for service users. Sullivan-Bolyai and Bova, (2010, p269) state that data should be collected in an objective and systematic way. However, this piece of research does not discuss explicitly how they collected their data; the report just mentions the data collection method. This led me to consider the reliability and validity of data collecting. The key factors in Hem, Heggen and Ruyter’s research (2008) were service users’ felt like there were inferior to the nursing staff. This was emphasised by the control imbalance and clear evidence of personal security alarms and keys, creating a distrustful therapeutic relationship. This relates back to Peplau’s theory of interpersonal relations (1952 cited in Forchuck, 1994), stating that a therapeutic relationship is two way and reciprocal (Simpson 1991, p2). In Hem, Heggen and Ruyter’s research (2008) because it was perceived that nurses did not trust the clients; the clients in turn did not trust them.
According to Peplau’s theory of interpersonal relations (1952 cited in Forchuck, 1994), trust is a very important factor in the Identification phase because it aids in open and honest communication from both nurse and client. There is an assumption that if this is not achieved the helping relationship cannot progress to the next stage, exploitation, where service users make use of the available resources (Simpson 1991, p11-12). This made me consider whether a distrustful therapeutic relationship can aid recovery.
Conclusion
To conclude, the purpose of this essay was to review and critically analyse the literature investigating the evidence base behind the use of interpersonal skills to help build a therapeutic relationship with clients suffering with mental health problems. This is important for healthcare professionals the best available evidence to care for service users and to inform decisions for which they are accountable.
The current evidence base for interpersonal skills is limited by literature which was published over ten years. This outlines a gap in the evidence base because changes in society and technology could have had an impact on the interpersonal processes and how professionals form therapeutic relationships, which has yet to be researched fully. This has significance for mental health professionals because interpersonal actions are based on sensitively observing patients and as evidence based practitioners these decisions need to be based on research and literature.
Specifically the aim of my argument was to support the idea that well-practised communication techniques are ineffective if the idea of the interpersonal connection goes unacknowledged. The research defines what service users’ value in a therapeutic relationship and helps healthcare professionals in the understanding of a successful and nurturing nurse-patient relationship.
References
Alexander, J. 2006. Patients’ feelings about ward nursing regimes and involvement in rule construction. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing.13.pp 543–553
Anglia Ruskin University. 2011a. Guide to CINAHL Plus with full text [online]. Anglia Ruskin University. Available at: http://libweb.anglia.ac.uk/guides/dbaseguides/files/CINAHL%20EBSCOhost.pdf [Accessed on 29 April 2012].
Anglia Ruskin University. 2011b. Levels of Achievement in the Interpersonal Skills Profile, DN160001D Practising Health and Social Care. Anglia Ruskin University, unpublished.
Aveyard, H and Sharp, P. 2009. A Beginner’s Guide to Evidence Based Practice in Healthcare. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Bach, S and Grant, A. 2010. Communication and interpersonal skills for nurses. Exeter: Learning Matters.
Barroso, J. In: Introduction to Qualitative Research. 2010. LoBiondo, G. and Haber, J. ed. 2010. Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence- Based Practice. 7th Ed. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier.
Blake, H. 2008. Innovation in practice: mobile phone technology in patient care. British Journal of Community Nursing. 13(4). pp 160-165.
Bowers, L., Geoff Brennan, G., Winship, G. and Theodoridou, C. 2009. Talking with acutely psychotic people: Communication skills for nurses and others spending time with people who are very mentally ill. London: City Univeristy.
Burnard, P.1996. Acquiring Interpersonal Skills: A Handbook for experiential learning for healthcare professionals. 2ndEd. Great Britian: T. J. Press.
Coatsworth-Puspoky, R., Forchuk, C., & Ward-Griffin, C. 2006. Nurse-client processes in mental health: Recipients’ perspectives. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing. 13. pp. 347–355.
DoH. 2010. Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS [online]. Department of Health. Available at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Healthcare/LiberatingtheNHS/index.htm [Accessed on 13 April 2012].
DoH. 2011. No health without mental health: a cross-government mental health outcomes strategy for people of all ages [online]. Department of Health. Available at http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_123766 [Accessed 02 May 2012].
Dougherty, L. and Lister, S. 2008. The Royal Marsden Hospital Manual of Clinical Nursing Procedures: Student Edition. 7th Edition. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
Forchuck, C. 1993. Hilgegarde E. Peplau: Interpersonal Nursing Theory. London: SAGE Publications.
Forchuk, C. 1994. The orientation phase of the nurse-client relationship testing Peplau's theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 20. pp. 532-537.
Fulton and Krainovich-Miller. In: Gathering and Appraising Literature.2010. LoBiondo, G. and Haber, J. ed. 2010. Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence- Based Practice. 7th Ed. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier.
Getliffe, K. In: Quantitative research designs.1999. Roe, B. and Webb, C. eds. Research and Development in Clinical Nursing Practice. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.
Gilburt, H. Rose, D. and Slade, M. 2008. The importance of relationships within mental health care: A qualitative study of service users’ experiences of a psychiatric hospital admission in the UK. BMC Health Services Research [e-journal]. 8(92). Available through: BioMed Central Open Access Database [Accessed on 07 May 2012].
Godshall, M. 2009. Fast Fact for Evidence-Based Practice. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Goyette Pounds, K. 2010. Client-Nurse Interaction with individuals with schizophrenia: A descriptive pilot study. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 31. pp. 770-774.
Green, M. F., & Leitman, D. I. (2008). Social cognition in schizophrenia., Schizophrenia Bulletin. 34 (4). pp. 670–672.
Haber, J. In: Legal and Ethical Issues 2010. 2010. LoBiondo, G. and Haber, J. ed. 2010. Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence- Based Practice. 7th Ed. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier.
Hart, V. A. 2010. Guest Editorial. Text Messaging: the antithesis of interpersonal relating. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 48(12). pp 5-6.
Harvard, L. 2007. How to conduct an effective and valid literature search. Nursing Times. 103 (45). pp. 32-33.
Hazelwood, A. 2008. Using text messaging in the treatment of eating disorders. Nursing Times. 104 (40). pp 28–29.
Hem, H. M., Heggen, K. and Ruyter, K. 2008. Creating Trust in an Acute Psychiatric Ward. Nursing Ethics. 15 (6). pp. 777-788.
Hrabe, D. P. 2005. Peplau in Cyberspace: An Analysis of Peplau’s Interpersonal Relations Theory and Computer-Meditated Communication. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 26. pp. 397–414.
Hurley, J. and Linsley, P. 2006. Proposed changes to the Mental Health Act of England and Wales: research indicating future educational and training needs for mental health nurses. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing.13. pp 48-54.
Jones, B. A. 2007. Putting practice into teaching: an exploratory study of nursing undergraduates’ interpersonal skills and the effects of using empirical data as a teaching and learning resource. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 16. pp. 2297-2307.
Laing, J. M. 2012. The Mental Health Act: exploring roles of nursing. British Journal of Nursing. 12(4). pp. 234-248.
Lewis, S. et al. 2011. The Literature Search Process: Guidance for NHS Researchers [online]. Available at: <arms.evidence.nhs.uk/resources/hub/21454/attachment>[Accessed on14 April 2012].
LoBiondo, G. and Haber, J. ed. 2010. Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence- Based Practice. 7th Ed. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier.
Morrisey, J and Callaghan, P. 2011. Communication for mental health nurses. London: Open University Press
NHS Choices. 2011. Schizophrenia [online]. Accessed at: http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Schizophrenia/Pages/Symptoms.aspx [Accessed on 28 April 2012].
NICE. 2011. Quality standard for service user experience in adult mental health [online]. National Institute of Excellence. Available at : http://publications.nice.org.uk/service-user-experience-in-adult-mental-health-improving-the-experience-of-care-for-people-using-cg136 [Accessed on 13 April 2012].
NMC. 2008. The code: Standards of conduct, performance and ethics for nurses and midwives [online]. Available at: http://www.nmc-uk.org/Documents/Standards/The-code-A4-20100406.pdf . [Accessed on 13 April 2012].
NMC. 2010. Standards for pre-registration nursing education: Draft for consultation [online]. Nursing and Midwifery Council. Available at: http://www.nmc-uk.org/Documents/Consultations/draft%20standards%20pre%20reg.pdf. Accessed on 08 May 2012.
O’ Dochartaigh, N. 2007. Internet Research Skills. 2nd Ed. London: Sage Publications.
Oxford University Press. 2007. Oxford Dictionary and Thesaurus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Papastarrou, E. Efstathiou, G. and Charalambous, A. 2010. Nurses’ and patients’ perceptions of caring behaviours: quantitative systematic review of comparative studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 67(6). pp 1191-1205.
Peplau, H.E. 1952. Interpersonal relations in nursing: A conceptual frame of reference for psychodynamic nursing. New York: Putnam.
RCN, 2012. Principles of Nursing Practice. [online]Available at <http://www.rcn.org.uk/development/practice/principles/the_principles> Accessed on: 08 May 2012
Reynolds, B. 2009. Developing therapeutic one-to-one relationships. In: Barker, P. (eds). 2009. Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing: The craft of caring. 2nd Ed. London: Hodder Arnold.
Richardson W. S. et al. 1995.The well-built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. American College of Physicians’ Journal Club. 123 (3). pp.12- 13.
Salzmann-Erikson, M. and Eriksson, H. 2005. Encountering Touch: A Path to Affinity in Psychiatric Care. Issues in Mental Health Nursing. 26. pp. 843-852.
Simpson, A. 2009. The acute setting. In: Barker, P. (eds). 2009. Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing: The craft of caring. 2nd Ed. London: Hodder Arnold.
Simpson, H. 1991. Peplau’s Model in Action. Hampshire: The Macmillian Press.
Sommers- Flanagan, R. and Sommers-Flanagan,J. 2007. Becoming an Ethical Helping Professional : Cultural and Philosophical Foundations. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Stahl, S. M., & Buckley, P. F. (2007). Negative symptoms of schizophrenia: A problem that will not go away. Acta Psychiatrica Sandinavica. 115. pp. 2–11.
Sullivan-Bolyai, S. and Bova, C. In: Data Collection Methods. 2010. LoBiondo, G. and Haber, J. ed. 2010. Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence- Based Practice. 7th Ed. Missouri: Mosby Elsevier.
Wallace, M. 2008. Encyclopaedia of Nursing. 2nd Ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
Appendix A
| Page