Smoking policies in the workplace - should public bars be included in the ban?

Authors Avatar

Smoking policies in the workplace – should public bars be included in the ban?

Introduction

I chose to research the planned smoking ban in Ireland in order to find out what other people think of the proposition. If the new legislation about smoking in workplaces goes ahead the ban will extend to licensed bars and clubs, and therefore have a huge effect on the public of Ireland. I am hoping to find out how the public feel about this and discover whether or not they are backing the ban or not. I have chosen this as I also feel it will be an interesting area of discussion as so many people will be affected by the legislation. I also think that society has a right to find out more about the legislation and discover what their peers feel about the ban.

The proposed ban is causing major controversy across Ireland as many different views are being taken where the ban is concerned. The ban has even led to a leading bookmaker in Ireland, Boylesports Bookmaker, placing odds of 6-1 that the prohibition will go ahead as planned in January. They also announced they believed the chances of the measure being stopped as 10-1 against, with a 3-1 chance of a compromise. This shows how much the proposed ban has affected the people in Ireland. It has become a major part of debate and although Taoiseach Bertie Ahern has said the ban will go ahead in January, as planned, many people are hoping this is not the case.

In order for me to study this question thoroughly I intend on looking up books in the library on the subject of smoking in the workplace. I will also use the internet as a research resource. My third source of research will be the public. I hope to ask their opinion via a focus group and a small selection of interviews.

Current legislation in the UK has no policy which bans or restricts people from smoking in public places other than for safety or hygiene reasons. Over three millions people are exposed to the ill effects of second hand smoking at work, yet workers have little or no protection under the current UK law. Ireland, however, will bring their ban into effect in January 2004. The plans to bring forth a ban were released in January 2003 by Michael Martin, the Minister of Health for Ireland, and were immediately given the support of the Mandate Trade Union, which represents Irelands bar workers. Mandate said that:

“150 bar workers die in Ireland each year from ill-health caused by passive smoking exposure” (BBC News Online 30/1/03)

This has then caused major controversy as the Vintners Federation immediately disagreed, saying:

“A total ban would be unworkable, untenable and unenforceable and ventilation systems are effective in extracting smoke.”

There are many people who agree that both the needs of smokers and non-smokers need to be addressed, and since propositions were announced conflicting ideas have arisen. The new Legislation in Ireland will mean that the Tobacco (Health Promotion and Protection) Regulations of 995 will be revoked and the new policy will be known as “Tobacco Smoking (Prohibition) Regulations 2003”

Smoking will be prohibited in a place or premises (other than a dwelling). This includes:

  • A place of work
  • An aircraft, train, ship or other vessel, public service vehicle or other vehicle used for the carriage of the public for reward, in so far as a place of work.
  • A place or premises to which paragraph (b), (c), (d) or (e)of section 47 (1) of the public health (tobacco) Act 2002 (No. 6 of 2002) applies, in so far as a place of work
  • A licensed premises, in so far as a place of work
  • A registered club, in so far as a place of work

Dr Teresa Tate of Marie Curie Cancer Care stated:

“There are still offices and factory floors where ash trays sit on desks and smoking is allowed in communal areas.”

If this ban goes ahead in January this will no longer be the case. It also means that public houses will be included and I hope to determine whether or not the public support this new legislation.


Method

During this project I intend to use various methods to enable me to learn the publics’ perspective on the new legislation. The first method I will use will be an interview. I will meet with different respondents on a one to one basis to enable myself to get the view points of different people. As the findings are going into my assignment I have provided each of my three respondents with a letter stating the confidentiality of the interviews. I have also let them know why I am doing the planned interviews. (Appendix 1)  I plan to meet in a quite area to ensure that my respondents are not distracted, and felt a public library would be the best idea. As I know the respondents this will insure I am safe with them and that they will feel at ease with me. I will carry my interview out in a relaxed manner to ensure I gain a good rapport with my respondents. All questions will be asked in the same order also to ensure no bias is made between one respondent and another.

The second method of research I am going to use is a focus group. I have selected eight people to be in my focus group. They are two non-smoking males, two non-smoking females, two current male smokers and two current female smokers. They all age between the ages of eighteen and twenty-six. I plan to meet at my home as I know all eight respondents personally and feel safe with them. The respondents have also been presented with a letter similar to that of the letter given to my interview respondents. (Appendix 2) The focus group is to be held around a circular table so that everyone feels at ease and so no one respondent dominates the group discussion. During this focus group I am going to begin with a short paragraph (Appendix 3) detailing what we are there to discuss and I will make notes throughout to enable myself to analyse the meeting afterwards. I have also made up a short questionnaire that I will present to the eight respondents to make detailed findings from unbiased questions. (Appendix 4) These questionnaires can be fund at the end of my assignment. (Appendix 5)


Results

In my results of my interviews I found the smoker preferred the idea of a ban and the two non-smokers favoured compromise, believing the ban to be too harsh. The interviews helped me see the greater picture and appreciate other people’s viewpoints where the ban is concerned. The focus group also provided interesting discussion and showed how many people can have such contrasting views to each other. I, however, felt that the questionnaire was the best method used and the results seem more substantial in comparison to the interview. I feel this was due to the larger amount of people I surveyed.

Out of the eight people who filled in the questionnaire, 50% were current smokers and 50% current non-smokers. Of the 100% of the people, 37% were working in conditions that allowed people to freely smoke around them during working hours. 12% (of this 37%) were smokers and 25% were non-smokers. This led to the finding that the non-smokers appear to be more susceptible to the passive smoking around them. These respondents were also the only ones who said smoking bothered them at work, and also led on to say that all of the symptoms questioned in number 4 (appendix 4) effected them in work. This suggests that non smokers are more affected by passive smoking than current smokers as none of the current smokers, mentioned in question 2, ticked any of these answers. The 25% who said that they did not enjoy working around smoke also led onto answer ‘yes’ to both questions six and seven of the questionnaire.

The total people gave answers to the questions on their view on where smoking in the workplace should or should not be. This question showed that half the people agree a designated area is the best idea for smoking in work. These people also agreed that smoking should not be banned in public bars. We see that of the 63% of people who agreed that smoking in public houses should be allowed only 13% were non-smokers. In fact all of the smokers questioned disagreed with the ban in bars. This seems to reflect the discussions during the focus group, as most people had felt a compromise was a better idea. It also reflected the interviews when 66% agreed a compromise and not a total ban was a better idea for public houses.

A vital point I found in my questionnaire was that the same percentage no to a smoking ban in bars, 63%, also said yes to a ban of smoking in restaurants. This flip flop of ideas may seem strange, but the focus group had raised this issue and it had been mentioned that:

“…in a place where food is consumed a total ban seems to be okay, but a pub isn’t primarily an eatery or a place for children...”

The mains findings I found were:

  • The majority of people didn’t have smoking permitted in their work area and were therefore not bothered by smoke at work.
  • Of the people who were bothered by smoke at work the main concerns were
  • the smell
  • coughing
  • their breathing
  • loss of concentration
  • effects on long tern health

  • Half of people said that a smoking area and a non-smoking area was the way forward.
  • The majority were unsure whether bar workers should have the same policies on smoking as offices workers do.
  • The majority favoured a total ban in restaurants, but no ban in public houses
  • 50% said no to the ban being a success, 50% were unsure. No one said it would work.
Join now!

Discussion

After I carried out both my interview and focus group I have found out that the majority of people have opinions I did not expect. The interviews were surprising as the smoker I interviewed hoped the ban would work and commented:

“I hope that the ban can stretch to the UK soon. This can help people quit and save money…also they’d be healthier.”

My interviews seemed to provide me with answers that were unaffected by the people around them, just the individual respondents opinion. This particular comment reflects that of a report produced on the Action on ...

This is a preview of the whole essay