Identify the independence factors, that you will need to consider in order to determine whether your firm can put itself forward to act as the first auditors of Gadget limited and the measure that may be taken to resolve any perceived conflicts.

Authors Avatar

Coursework –Semester 2 2003/2004

1. Identify the independence factors, and any other issues, that you and your co-partners in Ernest Peat & Co will need to consider in order to determine whether your firm can put itself forward to act as the first auditors of Gadget limited and the measure that may be taken to resolve any perceived conflicts.

The purpose of an audit is to provide an ‘independent Examination by an appropriately qualified person for the benefit of interested parties to whom the auditor reports to’. The principle of auditor independence is established via the Companies Act, and also an ethical code. Auditors are therefore expected to be independent of those whose work they are auditing and to whom they are reporting.

There are two types of audit independence

1- Practitioner independence

2- Profession independence

Practitioner independence: is the state of mind of the actual auditor. There are three types of independence that may determine whether independence has been put at risk.

  • -Programming independence – this is where auditors have the freedom to develop their own programme and the amount of work to be performed, within the overall bounds of the engagement.

  • -Investigative independence – this requires that no legitimate source of information to be closed to the auditor. This involves that the auditor has the freedom to examine information that the auditor thinks relevant.

  • Reporting independence – this means that the context of the report are related to the scope of the examination.

Profession independence like the individual practitioner, the profession as a whole must avoid any appearance of lacking independence.

Objectivity

The Case Study

By looking at the given scenario the following independence issues have arisen.

Michelle Bond is the sister of Basil Bond, one of your co- partners in Earnest Peat & Co’

Michelle Bond is a substantial shareholder in Gadget Limited, however she is not a director. Her rights as a shareholder does however has some bearing on the decision making process however only on an influential not binding basis. Independence becomes an issue as to whether the objectivity of Earnest Peat & Co can be maintained. Basil Bond must be seen to be acting objectively in order to provide an independent view of the company and not on the conflicting interest of protecting his sister’s investment. The Company’s Act 1985 does not disqualify a shareholder or debtor/creditors of the company or close relative of an officer/employee for that matter, but each RSB has an ethical code, which includes threats to independence, and objectivity which would normally disqualify the auditor in the circumstances cited.

Join now!

Jenny Jordan, ‘has also anticipated that she will also engage your firm to act as tax advisors’.

By providing additional services as well as performing the function of auditor the issue of independence may be raised in a both positive and negative light. The provision of other services may increase independence because of the value of the auditor to the client , i.e. due to value of service, and therefore there will be increased dependence of the client on the auditor. This essentially reduces the pressure of the client and results in the perception of greater independence ...

This is a preview of the whole essay