• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

To what extent do you agree or disagree with Abrahamson's argument and suggestions?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent do you agree or disagree with Abrahamson's argument and suggestions? Change in today's environment is everywhere. Gone are the days of lifelong job security and steady growth. Today we are faced with work force casualisation, high unemployment, rapidly changing technology, traditional skills being made redundant, downsizing and the ever-growing conflict between our work life and our family life (Organizational longevity and technological change by Terence C. Krell, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol 13 Issue 1 Date 2000, pp. 8-14). The whole world is becoming a tougher and more cutthroat environment for all organizations and the employees within them. However despite all this change, Abrahamson leads us to believe that change doesn't always have to create anguish within the organization. That in itself is a noble notion, however it is also an unrealistic expectation that rarely occurs in today's global competitive environment. To ascertain what Abrahamson is trying to put forward we must first understand what type of change he is talking about and why it is happening. We must also identify and further clarify the steps that are a part of organisational change if we are to properly evaluate and critique Abrahamson's approach; i.e. we must explain why we make such a big fuss of the change process and why it is beneficial to us. Only then can we judge the merits of Dynamic stability as a whole entity and individual parts within it. ...read more.


Barnholt adopted HP's values of innovation and contribution, trust and respect for individuals, and uncompromising integrity, but he added three new values: speed, focus, and accountability. Barnholt also wanted to improve the company's efficiency in terms of shared services. In mid-2001, the Agilent team faced a series of unexpected challenges. On April 5, 2001, Barnholt announced that business conditions had worsened further than previously expected. Barnholt wondered whether he and his team had gone too far in the organizational and cultural changes they had tried to implement. He wondered whether his vision of speed, focus, and accountability would be compatible with HP's legacy values and culture, and if so, how would he integrate the two (Agilent Technologies: Organizational Change (A), by Glenn R. Carroll, William P. Barnett, Victoria Chang; Published at Stanford university on 21st September 2001). This conclusively proves that dynamic change is not without its pains and tribulations. Even Abrahamson seems to aware of that since he claims that dynamic stability allows change without fatal pain, which is a clear contradiction of the heading that states "Change without Pain". After evaluating tinkering and kludging we must now look at the pacing within the theory of dynamic stability. Abrahamson claims that most proponents of change management argue that you have to change as much as possible as quickly as you can to stay ahead of competition. He claims that this is not always the case since organizations have different needs for change. ...read more.


Employees are not as cynical towards change that is implemented internally as opposed to changes, which are brought about from the external environment. This find is the real strength of dynamic stability, and is the key to Abrahamson's concept of change without pain. Finally Abrahamson claims that in order for dynamic stability to work one must hire generalists. The purpose of these generalists is to combine all the ideas from all the different areas of expertise. In short they are the ones who kludge and tinker with all the different components. Abrahamson seems to romanticise a bit here. There is no real need for generalists as long as there is a clear viewpoint as what has to be changed, by whom and by when. Dynamic Stability's key is to put internal sources to better use. Al employees within the organization should be generalists in one shape or form. Because the more multi-skilled the employees are the better and easier it is to kludge and tinker. To sum it up everyone should be a generalist, however there is no need for special recognition of generalists within the workplace. In conclusion dynamic stability is a different approach to change. However change without pain is impossible. There will always be some friction whenever the word change is mentioned inside an organisation. As mentioned earlier Dynamic stability does have it short falls however it is a useful tool for organisations that need to pace their change and are not in a need of a drastic overhaul. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level ICT in Business section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level ICT in Business essays

  1. business plan and organise event

    play station 2, 2 working controller & game is ready to be used. Also ensure that all cables are available to connect console to large screen in classroom 3:30pm Tournament Begins / 1st Game Begins Chetan, Michael Need to ensure that the tournament is started at the time it is

  2. Communication within Mars

    Mars also go though job centres or issue advertisements in papers as well as on the internet. The Electronic Point of Sale (EPOS) is used in organisations to enable them to control stock efficiently. EPOS is carried out when the product is being sold over the counter.

  1. Organisational Change

    it maintains a flatter organizational structure than its rivals, such as Sears and K-Mart. The second attribute is the decentralization of decision-making, which is attained by granting more authority and accountability to lower levels of the organization than would exist in a bureaucratic structure.

  2. Understanding a Company's Strategy - What to Look For.

    - Low price is not a competitive advantage unless it is accompanied by truly lower costs Business Models and Strategies for "Pure" Dot-Com Enterprises Successful dot-com strategies tend to incorporate the following features: - A distinctive strategy that delivers unique value to buyers and makes buying online very appealing -

  1. Technology as a tool of transformation.

    production work 2. coordination work 3. management work Production work This is associated with the implementation of robotic and process control instruments in production process, data processing computers for billing and account payable and effect of computer assisted design and computer assisted manufacturing in knowledge production.

  2. The history behind the Boots.

    This is an effort to increase customer loyalty; the proof for this is that Boots feel that 14 million are members to this card scheme. The objective of expansion and globalization has been that boots wanted to "reinforce our key role in the UK's primary healthcare".

  1. Fusions Acquisitions: Compaq - HP Merger.

    In fiscal year 2001, Compaq reported revenues of $33.6 billion. Enterprise computing accounted for 34% of 2000 revenues; consumer pc 18%; commercial personal computing 31%; Compaq global services, 16% & other, 1% (http://thenew.hp.com/). Compaq Computer Corporation was founded in February 1982 by Rod Canion, Jim Harris and Bill Murto, three

  2. Thorpe Parks history.

    Most often asked marketing questions Q Is the price of a new attraction affected by the viability of the ride? A Careful research is undertaken before a new attraction is bought. The attraction may be put in place to address a gap in guest numbers for a particular age range.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work