Jason behaves so badly that it is impossible for us to sympathise with his fate at Medea's hands

Authors Avatar

‘Medea’ by Euripides is a tragedy centred around the characters of Medea, the cunning, revengeful and manipulative woman with sorcerous abilities, and Jason, the heroic, royal yet selfish and ignorant man who leaves his wife and two young children for the daughter of the King of Corinth. Already you are left wondering where your sympathies lie; with the vindictive wife or the conceited husband? How far do we as the audience sympathise with Jason?

From the start we are aware that when fleeing for Corinth, Medea is ‘mad with love for Jason’ and that ‘to Jason she is all obedience’ from the Chorus, showing us that apparently Medea’s love for her husband was truly blinding for her; she ruthlessly murdered her brother in order to get a head start away from Colchis, and brutally influenced the murder of Jason’s evil uncle Pelias by his very own daughters. All this may be seen as merciless, cruel and evil, but that fact that she did this all for Jason does show just how far she went in hope of a happy life with her husband, not knowing the pitiless act he would commit when he left her for Glauce, daughter of Creon (the King of Corinth). This puts Jason down on the sympathy scale for the reason of him leaving Medea despite all she had sacrificed for him. However, it can indeed be argued that these horrific acts were disgusting and inhuman; although they were for Jason, Medea did carry them out on her own accord and Jason did not want her to murder either her brother or his uncle, so in some aspects Medea put herself in this situation in the first place, giving Jason a slight reason for leaving her.

The fact that the tutor does not seem to believe that Jason would ever abandon his sons and the audience know Jason did, also reduces our sympathy for him as we know that he is in fact as unfeeling as ‘to send these boys / Away from here – to banish them, and their mother too.’ The shock of just how traumatised Medea is for this reason also gives us reason not to sympathise with him at this point, seeing as we are only aware of the suffering Jason has caused for Medea – ‘She lies collapsed in agony, / Dissolving the long hours in tears’. This one-sided point of view at the start of the play would certainly encourage the audience in believing and understanding Medea’s distress, all rooted from Jason leaving her, leaving not much room for sympathy towards Jason.

Join now!

In addition, the chorus are very much on Medea’s side at the start of the play, which also influences the audience to sympathise with her accordingly as opposed to sympathising with the antagonistic Jason – ‘Poor Medea! Scorned and shamed’. The chorus is almost the audience’s indicator for knowing where their sympathy lies; although mostly towards Medea, at one point of the play, when Medea’s mind is set on killing her children, the chorus directs their sympathy more towards the children as they beg Medea not to murder them, the sympathy for Jason being more ambiguous – ‘Medea, by your ...

This is a preview of the whole essay