A.I COURSEWORK

A.I was projected for the first time on screen on 24th October 2001 in France.  Steven Spielberg took over the project cover based on a short story “Super Toys Last All Summer Long” by science fiction author Brian Aldiss, from the late Stanley Kubrick, who had been trying to get the film made for twenty years.  It was reportedly Kubrick’s dying wish that Spielberg made the film.

There were mixed feelings on A.I, some people liked the film and other didn’t, mainly because it became too much like a fairy tale in the second part of the film.  The general feeling was that it was of two definite halves.  It started as a sci-fi and then became a fairy tale in the second part.

Here are some examples of why A.I was not successful from the point of view of someone who did not like the film.

Here a critic complains about the visual effects of the film which have been reused:-

“Sadly, one of them, involving a moon shaped craft used to harvest “lost boy” robots in a dark forest, is recycled (much like the cast-off robots scrounging

 for spare parts) from his own E.T...  Sadly again, the other visually majestic moment is an apocalyptic underwater city scene that appears to have been

 cribbed from, of all things, Waterworld.”

The critic complains about the moon shaped aircraft visual effect has been used again in A.I the same as it was in Steven Spielberg’s own film E.T...  He thinks this is bad, as a director, to use the same idea in two different films and he complains on how his ideas should be new and fresh for each new film.  The critic further comments on how Spielberg also uses other visual effects that have already been used in a film called Waterworld.  

This critic was suspicious of the quality of the film as Kubrick wasn’t sure that the film was right after ten years and it took Spielberg only two to complete it.

“I also worry when a hyper-literate man like Stanley Kubrick (who, rumour

has it, has finished - and understood – more books than just a Clockwork

Orange) is unable to finish a screen play in ten years that admittedly non-

literate man like Spielberg pounds out in less than two …. My sad suspicion

is that Spielberg fashions himself as thoughtful a film maker as Kubrick.”

The critic is worried about why Kubrick, who was a highly educated man, bordering onto genius, would rely on Spielberg to finish his hard ten years work, he is also worried about why it only took two years for Spielberg to understand the material he was working with and wonders whether Spielberg did ever truly understand what a great masterpiece he was working with.  Did Spielberg bite off more than he could chew?  He feels that Spielberg thinks he is as great a film maker as Kubrick, when actually this critic believes that he is not.

Spielberg’s A.I was not a failure in the eyes of every critic though.  Some liked most aspects of the film.

Every film review I read, except one, had some sort of adverse criticism about the film.  They thought it became too much like a fairy tale or that Steven Spielberg couldn’t live up to the standard of Stanley Kubrick’s work.  Some of the film was classed as effective, but I do not think it was successful on the whole because of the many mixed views.

Join now!

If it were possible for robots to really feel emotions, this means that they would be an artificially created human.  The only difference would be is that the inside of their bodies would be electronic instead of organic and they would never become ill or aged.  They may be broken, but they could be fixed.  They would be a superior form of human being.  They would be able to love, hate, be jealous, happy, sad, excited, just as a normal human would.  You would hardly be able to tell the difference.  The robot humans would not be used as ...

This is a preview of the whole essay