Epic Theatre V's Dramatic Theatre.

Authors Avatar

Helen Brockley

Epic Theatre V’s Dramatic Theatre

Brecht believed that "To think, or write, or produce a play also means to transform society, to transform the state, to subject ideologies to close scrutiny." Having established this doctrine for himself, Brecht instigated the use of epic theatre in an attempt to break from the Aristotelian definition. Although he did not approve of the Aristotelian version, he redefined the nature of catharsis to suit his needs. Brecht said “...the epic poet presents the event as totally past, while the dramatic poet presents it as totally present.” Dramatic Theatre (Aristotelian theatre) emphasized the well-made play, suspension of disbelief, and progressive character development. To replace these facets of Dramatic theatre, Brecht created epic theatre, in which the plot is episodic, there is little cause and effect between scenes and character development is cumulative. For example in the Dramatic theatre…“I cry when someone cries. I laugh when someone laughs” and in the Epic theatre…“I laugh with those who cry and cry with those who laugh”. The epic invites calm, detached contemplation and judgement while the dramatic overwhelms reason with passion and emotion, the spectator sharing the actor's experiences.

Join now!

Brecht felt that drama could instruct and change society; therefore, it should be political. He believed that effective theatre should bring the audience to the point of decision and action. To accomplish this, he wrote what he called epic - as opposed to narrative - dramas that continuously emphasized the theatrical aspects; the audience was thus constantly reminded that it was in a theatre and could therefore make rational judgments about the material presented

Therefore, in Brecht's version of epic theatre, he not only aspired to provoke the audience into reforming society by rethinking common ideology, he wanted the audience ...

This is a preview of the whole essay