Review of To kill a Mocking Bird performed by the Queens Theatre touring company
Christopher Sood
Tuesday 26th September
Unit 3 Review of a play
To Kill A Mocking Bird
We saw "To kill a Mocking Bird" performed by the Queens Theatre touring company on Friday 22nd September 2000. This play was performed in the main hall of our school The Royal Liberty School. The play was about a black man called "Tom Robinson" he was accused of rape by the daughter of the drunken Mr Ewell and put on trial for a crime he didn't commit he was just helping the daughter fix something.
The play was performed as if by children acting out the court case and dressing up as the various characters. Through this method the story of the alleged rape trial was told. I think this was confusing because I didn't know who was who because they kept on changing characters. I could tell who as the judge and who was the defendant, defence and the prosecutor were but at the end I was left puzzled because one man came out of the door and they didn't tell you who it was, and there was all the characters on the stage and I got very confused. I also didn't like the way they presented it because it was stupid the way the children acted it out. It was stupid it looked weird adults trying to play children. I would have used flash backs but played by different people, this would have been a lot less confusing for the audience.
The two scenes I enjoyed the most was when Tom Robinson was in the witness box, he was acting as if he had a damaged hand and he never moved it at all even when he was getting frustrated at the prosecutions questioning. I think this was great acting as he was in role all the time. My second favourite part was when the drunken Mr Ewell was interrogated on the stand by the defence solicitor and he dug a hole for himself. He did this by continuing to lie even thought Tom Robinson had a damaged hand and he couldn't have hit her. The actor made his character look stupid by using his face and body and his voice was very edgy and he was very agitated in the stand he was always fidgeting.
Tuesday 26th September
Unit 3 Review of a play
To Kill A Mocking Bird
We saw "To kill a Mocking Bird" performed by the Queens Theatre touring company on Friday 22nd September 2000. This play was performed in the main hall of our school The Royal Liberty School. The play was about a black man called "Tom Robinson" he was accused of rape by the daughter of the drunken Mr Ewell and put on trial for a crime he didn't commit he was just helping the daughter fix something.
The play was performed as if by children acting out the court case and dressing up as the various characters. Through this method the story of the alleged rape trial was told. I think this was confusing because I didn't know who was who because they kept on changing characters. I could tell who as the judge and who was the defendant, defence and the prosecutor were but at the end I was left puzzled because one man came out of the door and they didn't tell you who it was, and there was all the characters on the stage and I got very confused. I also didn't like the way they presented it because it was stupid the way the children acted it out. It was stupid it looked weird adults trying to play children. I would have used flash backs but played by different people, this would have been a lot less confusing for the audience.
The two scenes I enjoyed the most was when Tom Robinson was in the witness box, he was acting as if he had a damaged hand and he never moved it at all even when he was getting frustrated at the prosecutions questioning. I think this was great acting as he was in role all the time. My second favourite part was when the drunken Mr Ewell was interrogated on the stand by the defence solicitor and he dug a hole for himself. He did this by continuing to lie even thought Tom Robinson had a damaged hand and he couldn't have hit her. The actor made his character look stupid by using his face and body and his voice was very edgy and he was very agitated in the stand he was always fidgeting.