• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15

By the mid nineteenth century, Britain had been the world's strongest economic power for nearly a century. It was the first industrialised nation and was hailed as the 'workshop of the world'.

Extracts from this document...


By the mid nineteenth century, Britain had been the world's strongest economic power for nearly a century. It was the first industrialised nation and was hailed as the 'workshop of the world'. In 1850, Britain was supplying more than 60 per cent of the world's coal, half the world's cotton goods, half its iron, and nearly three-quarters of its steel. Britain's staple industries were in fact accounting for 40 percent of the world's manufactured goods. However, in the last quarter of the century, although the industrial output was still increasing as well as the GDP, this once huge economic lead over all the other countries was rapidly being lost. By the onset of the First World War (1914-1918), the USA and Germany had overtaken Britain's manufacturing output in several key industries (see Table 1.1 - 1.3). Table 1.1: Coal Production (million tonnes) 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 Germany 6 12 34 59 89 149 222 USA 3.4 10 64.9 143 244 350 Britain 57 81 112 149 184 228 268 Table 1.2: Pig Iron Production (million tonnes) 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 Germany 1.3 2.5 4.1 7.5 9.5 USA 0.8 1.7 3.9 9.4 14 27 Britain 2.2 3.9 6 7.8 8 9 10 Table 1.3: Steel Production (million tonnes) 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 Germany 0.3 0.7 2.3 6.7 13.8 USA 1.3 4.3 10 26 Britain 0.7 1.3 3.6 5 5.9 Source: AJP Taylor The Struggle For Master in Europe 1848-1918, 1971, pp.29-30 The obvious question to ask is what had gone wrong. There has been no shortage of answers from historians to explain the relative decline of Britain's economic performance. The lack of tariff protection for British industries, a shortage of capital, the seeming inability to modernise industry, a lack of skilled technicians, scientists and entrepreneurs, are amongst the plethora of explanations. The most frequent explanation given for this relative decline and the subject of ongoing controversy was the apparent weakness in British entrepreneurship, as Burnham and Hoskins concluded from their study of the iron and steel industry in 1902. ...read more.


Lars G. Sandberg went even further in his defence of the entrepreneur. In 1969, Sandberg published his article, 'American Rings and English Mules: The Role of Economic Rationality', in the Quarterly Journal of Economics. Whereas, Wilson had used newer industries to counter the failure hypothesis, Sandberg went directly against the Aldcroft and Landes view using the cotton industry as an example of entrepreneurial efficiency. In the slow adoption of the ring spindle over the much slower and less efficient spinning mules, Sandberg concluded that this was not indicative of 'technological conservatism', but was instead the 'rational' response of British industrialists to the various factor costs, and the availability of a skilled workforce making the innovation unnecessary at that time.18 This was still the case in the 1930s when almost seventy-five percent of Lancashire's cotton yarn was still being produced on mules.19 What was so unique about Sandberg's theory, was not so much his results, but more the method he used to get them. His undertaking of a formal cost-benefit analysis, was the start of a wave of quantitative assessments, the most famous of these being the work of Donald N. McCloskey. Not only does McCloskey feel he has redeemed the performance of the British entrepreneur, but in his article 'Did Victorian Britain Fail?', published in 1970, McCloskey also arrived at a favourable conclusion of Britain's economic performance in the 1870-1914 period. Unlike the pessimistic image portrayed in the findings of Landes and Aldcroft, McCloskey views the late Victorian period as "a picture of an economy not stagnating but growing as rapidly as permitted by the growth of its resources and the effective exploitation of the available technology".20 McCloskey argued that there was no break in trend in British industrial production and real product growth, especially on a cyclical basis, till 1913. He reached this conclusion by measuring the aggregate output of the economy as a whole, and then he gauged how efficiently Britain utilised the available techniques and resources. ...read more.


we continue to accept generalised explanations about characteristics which, in so far as they amounted to 'short-comings' or even 'failure', were so variously distributed?".37 The work of Landes and Aldcroft, stressed the fall in entrepreneurial performance, offering examples, showing what they believe implicitly to be illustrative of poor industrial leadership and management. The main focus of their theories, being the poor response of British businessmen in adopting the latest techniques and machinery. However, by using the same statistical indicators, historians such as Charles Wilson, S.B. Saul were quick to dispute the claims of Landes and Aldcroft, by showing examples of industries that were more productive and profitable than their American and German counterparts. The quantitative assessments of McCloskey, Sandberg and Floud have opened the debate up to further controversial discussion. Although there work is of equal and perhaps greater merit than the early hypothesis of entrepreneurial failure, it is by no way fully conclusive. Ultimately any judgement made on the performance of British entrepreneurs or on the decline of British industrial performance is dependent upon the historian's choice of performance indicators. Entrepreneurial activity as this essay has shown, is not a factor in itself to explain the relative decline of the economy or the comparatively poor performance of British industrial production. It is difficult to ascertain whether an entrepreneur's aims and goals are going to be those that prove to be the best thing for the national economy. There clearly was not a typical Victorian entrepreneur, some were disappointing, particularly in the older staple industries, but they were not characteristic of the period as a whole. Successes could also be found in the newer industries and within the service industry, but again, this is not characteristic either. There are also regional disparities where cases of entrepreneurial endeavour and failure can be seen. At this moment in time there is simply not enough statistical evidence or enough detailed case studies to either be able to condemn the late Victorian and Edwardian entrepreneur, or redeem him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    International Business Strategy - Case Study on Unilever

    4 star(s)

    In addition, they are current members of World Trade Organization which are committed to provide a free trade environment by lowering import tariffs and removing trade barriers. A stable government and political environment are the basic criteria for economic growth; therefore, governments of the above stated developing countries strive to ensure political stability for their economic reforms to proceed effectively.

  2. A study of Patent system in India in the light of Patent Cooperation Treaty.

    the income is not like of any developed countries, so it's not possible to bear the heavy cost. But in this regard also, PCT has given the benefit and they try to minimize the cost as much as possible. As it is well known to everyone that International Patent Application

  1. Why was Britain the First Industrial Nation?

    The population growth of Britain is a factor, which enthused the already growing wealth of Britain. During the period of 1780 to 1850 the population of England and Wales increased, from 7,500,000 million to 18,000,000, hence causing a greater demand in goods such as food and housing.

  2. There are 3 areas to judge for sustainability. 1. Economic sustainability. 2.Social sustainability. 3. ...

    Also we must remove forced or defensive expenditure by the state. This includes taking away spending on defence, commuting, insulation against aircraft noise pollution, costs of car accidents etc. We do not increase welfare with these but simply keep ourselves stable.

  1. This investigation will try to test the level of external debt and measure its ...

    Within the International Organizations, 46% of the debt comes from IDB (International Bank of Development). The government seeks resources from these international organizations since they are currently the only source of financing.

  2. Why did it take until 1833 for the British government to illegalise the transatlantic ...

    it can be concluded that most of the evidence presented by politicians and slave owners is biased and questionably unreliable, which brings to the point that one of the reasons why it took until 1833 for the government to abolish then slave trade was because they were presented with conflicting evidence from supporters of the trade and abolitionists.

  1. Notes on the economic transformation of China.

    their production into China and transferred their skill and technology to China. So have TNCs ï SEZs , bringing along transfer of western tech + receive management + marketing skills from MNCs. Advanvements in modern tech. require high quality manufacturing and can be economically advantageous.

  2. The Economy Of Estonia - Features,Current State and Exports

    The main bodies in charge of telecommunications regulatory issues are the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications, Technical Surveillance Authority, and Estonian Competition Authority. The telecommunications sector has been completely liberalised since January 2001, when the special monopoly rights of the Estonian Telephone Company ended.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work