• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comment critically on comparative advantage as a basis for international trade.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Daniel Colton Comparative advantage was an idea proposed by David Ricardo in 1817, and is an idea which can be used on a variety of scales, but is most often used when analysing international trade. Ricardo used the idea of wool produced in England at a lower opportunity cost than wool is produced in Portugal relative to wine, while in Portugal wine is produced at a lower opportunity cost than wine is produced in Britain relative to the wool. This means that in Portugal it is less costly to produce wine in terms of what is the next best use of the resources involved. The reasons that this occurs could be for any number of reasons: weather, technology, productivity of workers in that industry and so on. This idea is one that all countries can benefit from, as even a tiny country will have a comparative advantage in a good relative to another good, even when trading with a world superpower. Comparative advantage is often used to look at just two countries and two goods, which is not necessarily a pitfall as the model can be applied to multiple countries and multiple goods, it is just for simplicity. ...read more.

Middle

The government would have to spend a huge amount on supply side policies such as very efficient schemes of education or perhaps low taxation (Thatcherite) to be able to transfer skills that quickly, and shift the long run aggregate supply curve to the right, thus reducing unemployment: Because the government realises just how unlikely and difficult it is to transfer resources, it actively discourages the failure of an industry, as shown by the EU's enormous subsidies of the farmers in this country, most notably the Common Agricultural Policy. It is therefore acting against the theory of comparative advantage, as this would dictate that the farmers move into the service sector, where Britain is very productive. This shows how politics has a great affect on trade once the industry has been established, though comparative advantage may well have dictated what industries were originally started and how they grew, even if politics has a greater effect today. The fact that politics makes a big difference in the effect of comparative advantage demonstrates another shortcoming of the theory. ...read more.

Conclusion

It is at no stage a random process as to what goods are traded, and there are good reasons for why bananas aren't grown in England and sheep aren't reared in the West Indies. The productivity of a country in producing a good dictates what it will trade, and a country that is very inefficient in producing a good will move onto something to which it is more suited. There are of course cases where this is overridden by the factors mentioned, but ultimately comparative advantage theory does form a 'basis' as the title suggests, to almost all international trade. For the trade to occur, the terms of trade are laid out, which is simplified to compromising between the opportunity cost ratios of the two countries. Once again, this is not exactly how it works, as politics and economics merge to create something slightly different, but it is highly likely to be something close to what comparative advantage suggests it should be. It is inevitable that the model does not fit the real world, but there is not a single economic theory that can be applied directly to an economy with no assumptions being made. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the importance of international trade to the UK economy

    4 star(s)

    The significance of international trade can only be calculated by the level of openness of the economy. This openness can be measured by the proportion of total final expenditure in an economy which is taken up by sales abroad. International trade has a higher proportion of GDP than when compared

  2. CRITICALLY EVALUATE THE THEORIES OF ABSOLUTE ADVANTAGE (ADAM SMITH MODEL) AND COMPARATIVE ADVANTAGE (DAVID ...

    Each of these are defined formally below using the notation of the Ricardian model. The concepts are presented in the following order; labour productivity, absolute advantage, opportunity costs, comparative advantage. Labour productivity is defined as the quantity of output that can be produced with a unit of labour.

  1. Critically discuss the role and importance of international commercial arbitration as an alternative dispute ...

    As a result, the seller would have to defend the buyer's claims, and if the buyer prevailed, presumably the matter would end there. Conversely, if the buyer prevailed, the seller would then have to start a different arbitration proceeding before different arbitrators, with all the related costs that entails, in order to recover compensation from its vendor.

  2. How important are comparative advantage and absolute gainsto Liberal approaches to IPE?

    Consistent with the Neoliberal institutional key concept, David Mitrany's ideas stem the proposal that new actors (transnational corporations, non-governmental organizations) and new patterns of interaction (interdependence, integration) should be more considered (loc.cit.). Robert Keohane (1989), added that the actors must have some mutual benefits which they must potentially gain from

  1. Why did it take until 1833 for the British government to illegalise the transatlantic ...

    As the trade brought financial gain to many it meant they led to believe it to be a success, so when politicians and influential individuals in the decision of whether the trade should be abolished or not they automatically; would say no to abolition of the trade.

  2. Are recessions inevitable?

    2 It shows that America has faired better in terms of a robust GDP growth rate, whereas it has lagged far more behind in its unemployment rate. 2. What are the causes of a recession? 3 According to Keynesian theory, a downturn in the economic cycle arises because of the multiplied effects of the changes in spending and investment.

  1. This paper investigates an evidence to support the HOV model by carrying out a ...

    Economies of scale are relevant for explaining intra-industry trade between industrialized countries (see also Deardorff, 1984). Following Leamer (1984), who also uses the HOV model, this paper does not incorporate such economies into the model because the model explains net trade, i.e.

  2. International trade - In this case I choose the country Canada. When doing a ...

    Smith saw that this was a good part about the invisible hand mechanism. He identified two ways to obtain the help and cooperation of other people. First is to appeal to the benevolence and goodwill of others. And the second way is to appeal instead to other people's self-interest.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work