• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

David Ricardo theory of comparative advantage

Extracts from this document...


Introduction: Since David Ricardo first illustrated the theory of comparative advantage in the early 19 century. He solved a problem that had eluded Adam Smith. Comparative advantage explains why a country might produce and export something its citizens don't seem very skilled at producing when compared directly to the citizens of another country. The explanation of the apparent paradox is that the citizens of the importing country must be better at producing something else, making it worth it for them to pay to have work done by the exporting country. Amazingly, the citizens of each country are better off specializing in producing only the goods at which they have a comparative advantage, even if one country has an absolute advantage at producing each item. Although most models and theories of trade suggest that some people would benefit and some lose from free trade, the Ricardian model shows that everyone could benefit from trade. This can be shown using an aggregate representation of welfare (national indifference curves) or by calculating the change in real wages to workers. However, one of the reasons for this outcome is the simplifying assumption that there is only one factor of production. The analysis of this model can explain what happens when each country moves from autarky (no trade) ...read more.


The logic behind absolute advantage is quite intuitive. This confusion between these two concepts leads many people to think that they understand comparative advantage when in fact, what they understand, is absolute advantage. To recognize this 2 different theory can use below table 4 Tab 4: Trade to Kenya (1000 US$) Export to EU Import from EU Wearing apparel and leather products 15,027 5350 Food products 783,658 120,997 Textiles machinery 11,805 64,402 Footwear 273 2363 Non-metallic mineral products 11,088 14,096 Transport equipment 4,067 94,096 Plastic products 30 29,027 Beverages 118 5,278 Furniture 268 3,326 Wood products 2,146 908 Chemicals 11,024 173,129 Sources: (M.V.Charles/international trade and world economy, Chapter 3) From the table, both imports and exports can be seen. The EU has considerably higher productivity than Kenya. Based on the theory of absolute advantages, the EU should only be exporting to Kenya, and not import anything at all. However, as is evident from the table, the EU does import goods from Kenya, which could be based on trade in accordance with comparative. (C.V. Marrewijk). The table above fully evident that the theory of comparative advantage does better in terms of explanatory power than the theory of absolute advantage. The benefit after trade also can be seen at worker's wage. ...read more.


Therefore, to dismiss the results of economic analysis on the basis of unrealistic assumptions means that one must dismiss all insights contained within the entire economics discipline. Surely, this is not practical or realistic. Economic models in general and the Ricardian model in particular do contain insights that most likely carry over to the more complex real world. Interpreting the Theory of Comparative Advantage: The usual way of stating the Ricardian model results is to say that countries will specialize in their comparative advantage good and trade them to the other country such that everyone in both countries benefit. Stated this way it is easy to imagine that it would not hold true in the complex real world. A better way to state the results is as follows. The Ricardian model shows that if any country want to maximize total output in the world then, first, fully employ all resources worldwide; second, allocate those resources within countries to each country's comparative advantage industries; and third, allow the countries to trade freely thereafter. In this way might raise the well being of all individuals despite differences in relative productivities. In this description, do not predict that a result will carry over to the complex real world. Instead to carry the logic of comparative advantage to the real world and have to look to achieve a certain result (maximum output and benefits).. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays


    Some countries have an absolute advantage in the production of many goods relative to their trading partners. Some have an absolute disadvantage. They are inefficient in producing anything, relative to their trading partners. The theory of comparative costs argues that, put simply, it is better for a country that is

  2. How important are comparative advantage and absolute gainsto Liberal approaches to IPE?

    Comparative Advantage On the basis of the traditional theory of comparative advantage originated by David Ricardo (1772-1823), a classical theorist, in his "Principles of Political Economy and Taxation" (1817), trade can still be beneficial to both parties even though one nation may be less efficient than another in producing both commodities.

  1. This paper investigates an evidence to support the HOV model by carrying out a ...

    GDPi/GDPw GDPi/GDPw The right-hand side of this equation reflects the relative true factor endowments of country i, if the right-hand side is positive for a particular factor k in country i, then the country has a true abundance of this factor.

  2. International trade - In this case I choose the country Canada. When doing a ...

    With this system it has two requirements. One was that the marker needed to be free of government intervention, and the other was that there had to be a competition. Smith recognized the danger of monopoly: "A monopoly is either to an individual or to a trading company.

  1. international trade

    Also B Braun think that you have to satisfy you employees they involve the employees what happens en spend money in them to give them free trainings to get better products. They even have their own academy ''Aesculap'' To create more professionals for the future.

  2. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    Smithian growth continues apace in developed and developing countries, but, since the Industrial Revolution, it has been supplemented by the "Promethean" growth powered by successive technological revolutions.21 The evidence of the past two centuries, roughly since the post-Napoleonic settlement, tends to bear out the proposition that countries that are more open to the world economy grow faster, i.e.

  1. Can different endowments of factor resources fully explain countries differences in comparative costs.

    Another country can also produce one leather sofa but to a cost of only thirty gold chains or six televisions. This difference in production costs leads us to two different types of advantages one country can have over another. Absolute advantage with regard to a certain product is when one country can produce it using less resources than another country.

  2. Flower Industry in Netherlands

    In addition, when being cut, flowers should be correctly handled since this determines that their vase life and whether or not the buds will open or not. From this point, it's difficult to make a judgment. Therefore, it makes a lot of sense that reputation of suppliers and producers is

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work