• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The British Experience.

Extracts from this document...


The British Experience by Stewart Fist You probably think that the Americans were the first to introduce competition into their telephone networks, but that's not really so. However they were the first to privatise telcoms -- in fact, they've never had anything else. At one time there were 27,000 telephone companies in the USA, but, over time the Bell Company (later AT&T;) bought up most of the profitable urban ones, and then blackmailed the US government into giving them what amounted to monopoly rights. However, in 1983, Judge Harold Greene of the US District Court, foisted on AT&T what is called the Modification of Final Judgement (MFJ) which broke the company up into seven RBOCs (Regional Bell Operating Companies), leaving AT&T; itself as little more than a long-distance carrier. In return for being given regional monopoly rights within areas known as LATAs (Local Access Transport Areas), the RBOCs were prohibited from competing in long-distance. If you wanted to phone from one LATA to another, your call had to pass from RBOC to RBOC across the LATA boundary via the network of a long-distance or IXC (Inter-eXchange Carrier). Today, only a few thousand mum-and-dad, small-town, telephone companies remained outside these local call monopolies, and the market has been opened more under the 1997 Telecommunications Bill. In long distance there are about 300 companies (most point-to-point between two towns), but the only real competition to AT&T; still comes from the two largest, Sprint and MCI. In Britain, however, way back in 1981, the Thatcher revolution introduced competition across the board in telecommunications. This was, in economic rationalist terms, "The Real Stuff". A small company called Mercury had long held the rights to run the local service in Hull and, before 1981, it was the sole non-BT-supplied local telephone service in the UK. In 1982 Mercury was acquired by an independent international cable company Cable & Wireless (C&W) ...read more.


Obviously Labour Party traditions are universal! Privatisation proved to be a boon for the UK telco executives, as it will in Australia from next year. The change in ownership has also substantially improved the life-style of a number of front-bench Conservatives who found places reserved for them both in the new BT and C&W. Lord Young, the champion of telecommunications privatisation when he was head of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) under Thatcher, is now the million-pound-plus chairman of C&W, while Lord Tebbit who took over the DTI from Young and pushed through the privatisation legislation, ended up on British Telecom's board. This old English tradition of finding jobs for out-of-work politicians is something that Australia sadly lacks. We prefer to insult our politicians with enforced idleness, cushioned only by exorbitant parliamentary pensions and free travel. But in the UK, ex-Tory front-benchers must go cap in hand and humbly ask for a job in the City, often with the companies that they helped to privatise. Fortunately, most of the privatised utilities have shown their compassion generously. The workforce in BT were not quite so fortunate. From a peak of 244,418 in 1990, the staffing levels dropped to about 130,000 at last count -- close to one in every two jobs disappeared. For comparison, over roughly the same period, Telstra's staff level rose from 70,000 in 1991, to 80,000 last year, and now, after some serious outsourcing decisions (IBM and Visionstream), it has dropped back again to 74,000. The British approach to regulating competition is also much more intrusive than Australia. The Bills now passing through our Parliament create a new telecommunications environment based strongly on laissez-faire theories of 'self-regulation' (an oxymoron). However, if you flick through back issues of the UK newspapers, between1981 and 1995, you'll find weekly stories about Oftel charging BT with "uncompetitive practices"; the Merger and Monopolies Commission threatening to take action; Mercury and BT in fierce legal battles before the Lords; etc. ...read more.


In mid-1995, Mercury had a serious crisis; it was over stretched and no longer able to maintain competition on all fronts. About 2,500 people left, including nearly half the executives, and Mercury sold or closed some of its operating divisions. It dropped completely out of the payphone business. But while Mercury is still BT's main competitor but with only seven percent of the staff. Mercury concentrated on local business connections and it exists today mainly on its international call profits. In mid-1995 BT wanted to buy Mercury/C&W's international operation, but the Mergers and Monopoly Commission insisted they sell the local loop operation, and the idea was quietly dropped. In recent times, Mercury and BT seem to have developed a closer working relationship -- facing a common enemy. When BT matched American transatlantic charges while raising local line rentals to compensate; Mercury quietly made the same price cut, but didn't complain to Oftel. There are also questions as to how BT and Mercury are able to offer special international tariffs at rates below those of the interconnect fee, which is the price other competitors need to pay to use just one part of BT's network. In management terms, there's no doubt that BT is a much better company. Over this decade it has managed to pay excellent salaries and dividends, and to stack up retained earnings to the point where it bought MCI, the second largest long-distance carrier in the USA, for nearly $7 billion. It is now busy rapidly expanding the Concert consortium around the world. So on an international competitive scale, one would have to say that the privatisation of BT was a success. But how did the public, left at home, fare in all of this? Well NUS International produces an annual comparative report on call charges, and generally the Oscar winner for "Highest Local Charges" is - you guessed it - British Telecom. The only regular challenge it seems to get is from Australia's Telstra - but maybe the voting's rigged. END Original Source: www.abc.net.au/http/sfist/ukexp.htm ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Markets & Managing the Economy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Supermarkets in UK - An oligopily

    5 star(s)

    Asda Relocation to larger, out-of-town sites in the 1980s gave many supermarkets the additional space required for extending their non-food offering. Asda in particular, focuses on non-food sales, because its 400 stores are generally much bigger than its competitors. Some of Asda's non-food brands have been phenomenally successful - the

  2. The Scottish Smoking ban

    Below is the supply and demand graph. The graph showing the demand curve shifting to the left which is showing a decline in the demand for cigarettes. Again, the supply curve will stay the same, as there will still be the same amount of cigarettes to supply to the customers to begin with.

  1. For a duopoly involving homogeneous products, explain and contrast a Cournot, Stackelberg and Bertrand ...

    The can be used to show firms 1's optimal response to q2. Where the slope of the iso-profit curves are zero we get a line going through to indicate the firms reaction curve. Asthe model involves symmetry between the firms, the reaction curve for firm 2 over the relevant range is given by q2 = r2(q1)

  2. TransEcon has been commissioned to conduct a research study into the strategic issues facing ...

    year on year - comes from this department to the SRA which then passes it on. The department also appoints the SRA and the Rail Regulator. HM Railways Inspectorate: Part of the Health and Safety Executive, the Railways Inspectorate is responsible for ensuring that new track and trains meet safety standards, and for investigating crashes, particularly serious ones.

  1. What are the origins of the Pension Crisis and what can be done to ...

    60 taking out a similar annuity could expect an income of just �650 per annum (The Observer). One way that individual can increase their annuity rates is to work beyond the traditional retirement age, thereby postponing the purchase of their annuity.

  2. Economics Report on Budget

    As the tax has gone up people who are addicted to smoking would steal money to buy the cigarettes. The society would turn for the worse as crime level will increase from this. -"I expect the consumption of beer to fall because the tax has risen by 1p".

  1. The Importance of the Canadian Airline Industry.

    There was less incentive for efficiency in a regulated industry and chosen carriers could afford to sit on a virtual monopoly because lack of competition meant that there was less need to streamline operations. Consequently, there were few savings to pass on to consumers.

  2. Agrarian Discontent in the Late 1800's - Why the Farmers Were Wrong

    A farmer named Dyke discovers that the railroad has increased their freight charges from two to five cents a pound. This new rate, "...ate up every cent of his gains. He stood there ruined." (Doc. H). The railroads regularly used rebates and drawbacks to help win the business of large

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work