Some twenty years later, the end of another world war was looming ever nearer, the much wiser world leaders sought to prevent a repeat of the chaos post-WWI. In 1944 delegates from more than forty countries met in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, to establish a new more manageable international economic system. With the Roosevelt administration’s belief, that the economic collapse during the inter-war years was a direct result of Washington’s unwillingness to play the lead role in international economic relations, the U.S. delegation was convinced that it would be in their best interests to lead the major powers’ construction of the post-war international economic order, especially in view of the general economic conditions of Europe.
There were two plans tabled at Bretton Woods, firstly was the Keynes Plan proposed by the British delegates, this plan anticipated the establishment of a clearing union and the creation of a large amount of credit (bancor) to be allotted among all the trading nations. The estimated $35 billion of bancor would be used for financing balance of payments deficits as well as serving to help finance post war reconstructions. The second was the White Plan, proposed by U.S. delegates, suggesting the setting up of international institutions under the control of member countries. The Keynes plan was unacceptable to the U.S. delegates, who claimed it had inflationary tendencies, the operations would be too automatic, and not allow the governments of members enough discretion in their balance of payment policies.
The United States wanted to create a system based on liberal principles of free trade, laissez-faire, it was predicted that a system based on these principles would lead to greater prosperity and international cooperation. This was supported by other Western powers as they also insisted that a stable and managed international financial system was necessary for world economic order and global cooperation in financial and trade relations. This led to the establishment of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) – later known as the World Trade Organization (WTO), the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IRBD) - later known as the World Bank (WB), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). As well as a new gold exchange standard system based on the U.S. dollar as the international standard for currency value.
In 1947, at the Geneva Convention GATT was established. In the hope to prevent a resurgence of economic nationalism and protectionist policies and to further encourage international cooperation and trade. GATT aimed to promote the basic philosophy underlying its code of conduct, that each contracting party should enjoy reasonable access to the markets of its trading partners in return for offering the same sort of access to its domestic markets to foreign exporters. In this way, world trade would expand rapidly with all the countries experiencing fair trading relations and to establish a multilateral and non-discriminatory approach to international trade.
New policies introduced to further encourage this were to unify the condemnation of quantitative trade restrictions with some exceptions in the temporary balance of payments purposes and to allow developing countries to protect their infant industries. Along with efforts to extend the principles of international organization into the field of commercial policy, there were clauses that prohibited the preferential trade agreements with exceptions concerning the formation of FTA’s, customs unions, and the discrimination for temporary balance of payments to aid economic growth.
Multilateral institutions specifically related to international trade, such as GATT and WTO, have established formal rules and norms of economic behaviour. The Group of Eight (Go8) is another example, although it has no legally distinct institutional framework. The Go8 is made up of the world’s largest economic powers, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Japan, Germany and Russia, which together account for approximately two-thirds of the world’s economic output. The Go8 gather to hold annual summit meetings to discuss the main issues of the international political economy, these summits are often attended by other states as well.
In 1945 the IBRD was established, functioning to aid in the reconstruction and development of territories of members by facilitating the investment of capital for productive purposes, including the restoration of economies destroyed or disrupted by war, the reconversion of productive facilities to peacetime needs and the encouragement of the development of those same productive facilities and resources in less developed countries. Other promotions were private foreign investment, the long-range balanced growth of international trade and the maintenance of equilibrium in balances of payments.
The World Bank is in fact an umbrella organization, consisting of the IBRD, the International Finance Corporation (IFC) est. 1956, the International Development Association (IDA) est. 1960, the Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency (MIGA) est. 1988 and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) est. 1966. Membership in the IMF also requires membership in the WB - as these two institutions usually conduct their annual meeting together – although governments can choose which of these agencies, they sign up to individually. The IBRD has 184 member governments, and the other institutions have between 140 and 176 members.
The International Monetary Fund, consists of two major departments firstly the General Department and secondly the Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) Department. The General Department administers each member’s general resource account (GRA) and quotas of contributions as determined by the IMF. The Special Drawing Rights Department oversees the distribution of SDRs as international reserve assets. The principle responsibility of the IMF is ensuring the stability of the international monetary and financial system - the system of international payments and exchange rates among national currencies that enables trade to take place between countries. The IMF seeks to promote economic stability and prevent crises, as well as helping resolve crises when they do occur and to promote growth and alleviate poverty.
The IMF employs three main functions, surveillance, technical assistance and lending, to meet these objectives. Surveillance is the regular discussion and policy advice that the IMF offers to each of its members. Once a year, the Fund conducts in-depth appraisals of each member country's economic situation. It discusses with the country's authorities the policies that are most conducive to stable exchange rates and a growing and prosperous economy. The IMF also combines information from individual consultations to form assessments of global and regional developments and prospects. The IMF's findings are published twice each year in the World Economic Outlook and the Global Financial Stability Reports.
Technical assistance and training are also offered by the IMF to help member countries strengthen their capacity to design and implement effective policies. Technical assistance is offered in several areas, including fiscal policy, monetary and exchange rate policies, banking and financial system supervision and regulation, and statistics. However, if member countries experience difficulties financing their balance of payments the IMF also provides financial assistance to give members the breathing room they need to correct balance of payments problems. A policy program where financing is designed by the national authorities, in close cooperation with the IMF, continued financial support is conditional on effective implementation of this program.
The IMF’s funds were pooled, with each member country required to submit a percentage of its gross national product 25 percent in a combination of gold and dollars and 75 percent in its own currency. Apart from determining the member’s drawing rights, the size of the quota also determined the member’s voting (strength) rights in the Funds deliberations. The largest quotas were initially given to the U.S. ($2,750m), Britain ($1,300m), China ($550m), France ($450m) and India ($400m), however the Fund held the administrative power to make periodic reviews to re-examine quotas and make changes, if the IMF deemed such a step desirable for the proper functioning of the International Monetary System. When the IMS functioned smoothly, the IMF’s functions were expected to be minor importance. On the other hand, when imbalances and other difficulties arise it was considered to possess ample reserves and sufficient powers to return the system quickly to stability.
While the Bretton Woods System can be accredited for the economic growth and stability of the industrialised Western countries, the results were far less spectacular for developing states. The founders of the Bretton Woods System were preoccupied primarily with the development and well being of their own economies and paid little attention to the remote marginal economies in both African and Asian countries, who still had not even gained independence from colonial rule in the late 1940s. The new world economy, which stressed free trade and laissez faire capitalism, could not stipulate the economic growth in developing countries. The 1950’s and 1960’s were both decades of political upheaval with many countries fighting against and gaining independence from colonialism, the burdens of both Nation and State building increased the economic difficulties. Leaving many developing countries with the view that their situation was a product of a preferentially Western system. This then lead to strong statist economic policies being implemented, in order to move developing economies toward industrialisation, as a way to challenge the system, sometimes these countries resorted to extreme measures such as nationalising productive or revenue generating facilities.
By 1971 the international economy was experiencing sever strains, as the amount of liquid U.S. dollar balances grew so large that governments had great difficulty defending the official parities. People began to loose confidence in the strength of the almighty dollar, as lowered barriers to capital flows meant that billions of dollars could move around the world in a matter of minutes. In august 1971, U.S. President Nixon moved to sever the link between the dollar and gold, effectively ending the Bretton Woods era. This move freed the United States from having to automatically convert dollars into other assets, trade dollars for gold at $35 dollars per ounce, or have to set an official parity of the dollar relative to gold or other currencies and then have to defend those exchange rates at all costs. This was the birth of a new era, that of the managed flexible exchange rate.
Reference List
-
Kenwood, A.G., Lougheed, A.L., 1999, The Growth of the International Economy 1820-2000, 4th Ed., Routledge, London.
-
Pearson, S. P. & Payaslian, S., 1999, International Political Economy: Conflict and Cooperation in the Global System, 1st ed., McGraw Hill College, New York.
-
Samuelson et al., 1992, Economics: Volume 2- Macroeconomics, 3rd ed., McGraw Hill Book Company, Sydney.
-
Smiley, G., 2002, 1940 - Rethinking the Great Depression, Ivan R. Dee, Chicago.
-
The International Monetary Fund 2006, ‘IMF Activities’, IMF Facts Sheet, retrieved on 25 April 2006 from: http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/glance.htm
-
The U.S. Department of State's Bureau of International Information Programs 2006, ‘What is the Group of Eight’, retrieved on 22 April 2006 from: http://usinfo.state.gov/ei/economic_issues/group_of_8.html
-
The World Bank Group 2006, ‘Article I: Purposes’, IBRD Articles of Agreement, retrieved on 22 April 2006 from: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/0,,contentMDK:20049557~menuPK:63000601~pagePK:34542~piPK:36600~theSitePK:29708,00.html
-
Wikimedia Foundation 2006, ‘World Bank Group Agencies’, World Bank Group, retrieved on 22 April 2006 from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Bank
Bibliography
Kenwood, A.G., Lougheed, A.L., 1999, The Growth of the International Economy 1820-2000, 4th Ed., Routledge, London.
Pearson, S. P. & Payaslian, S., 1999, International Political Economy: Conflict and Cooperation in the Global System, 1st ed., McGraw Hill College, New York.
Samuelson et al., 1992, Economics: Volume 2- Macroeconomics, 3rd ed., McGraw Hill Book Company, Sydney.
Smiley, G., 2002, 1940 - Rethinking the Great Depression, Ivan R. Dee, Chicago.
Carbaugh, R.J., 1995, International Economics, 5th ed., South-Western College Publishing Co., Ohio.
Smiley, G., 1940 - Rethinking the Great Depression, Ivan R. Dee, (Chicago, 2002), p. 46
Smiley, G., 1940 - Rethinking the Great Depression, Ivan R. Dee, (Chicago, 2002), p. 47
Smiley, G., 1940 - Rethinking the Great Depression, Ivan R. Dee, (Chicago, 2002), p. 52
Smiley, G., 1940: Rethinking the Great Depression, Ivan R. Dee, (Chicago, 2002), p. 53
Smiley, G., 1940: Rethinking the Great Depression, Ivan R. Dee, (Chicago, 2002), p. 57
Pearson, S. P. & Payaslian, S., International Political Economy: Conflict and Cooperation in the Global System, 1st Ed., McGraw-Hill College, (New York, 1999) p. 92
Kenwood & Lougheed, The Growth of the International Economy 1820-2000, 4th Ed., Routledge,
(London, 1999), p. 237.
Pearson, S. P. & Payaslian, S., International Political Economy: Conflict and Cooperation in the Global System, 1st Ed., McGraw-Hill College, (New York, 1999) p. 92-3
Pearson, S. P. & Payaslian, S., International Political Economy: Conflict and Cooperation in the Global System, 1st Ed., McGraw-Hill College, (New York, 1999) p. 127
Kenwood & Lougheed, The Growth of the International Economy 1820-2000, 4th Ed., Routledge,
(London, 1999), p. 241
Kenwood & Lougheed, The Growth of the International Economy 1820-2000, 4th Ed., Routledge,
(London, 1999), p. 242
Pearson, S. P. & Payaslian, S., International Political Economy: Conflict and Cooperation in the Global System, 1st Ed., McGraw-Hill College, (New York, 1999) p. 177
U.S. Department of State's Bureau of International Information Programs 2006, ‘What is the Group of Eight’, retrieved on 22 April 2006 from: http://usinfo.state.gov/ei/economic_issues/group_of_8.html
The World Bank Group 2006, ‘Article I: Purposes’, IBRD Articles of Agreement, retrieved on 22 April 2006 from: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTABOUTUS/0,,contentMDK:20049557~menuPK:63000601~pagePK:34542~piPK:36600~theSitePK:29708,00.html
Wikimedia Foundation 2006, ‘World Bank Group Agencies’, World Bank Group, retrieved on 22 April 2006 from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Bank
Pearson, S. P. & Payaslian, S., International Political Economy: Conflict and Cooperation in the Global System, 1st Ed., McGraw-Hill College, (New York, 1999) p. 127
The International Monetary Fund 2006, ‘IMF Activities’, IMF Facts Sheet, retrieved on 25 April 2006 from: http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/glance.htm
The International Monetary Fund 2006, ‘IMF Activities: Functions’, IMF Facts Sheet, retrieved on 25 April 2006 from: http://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/facts/glance.htm
Kenwood & Lougheed, The Growth of the International Economy 1820-2000, 4th Ed., Routledge,
(London, 1999), p. 239-240
Pearson, S. P. & Payaslian, S., International Political Economy: Conflict and Cooperation in the Global System, 1st Ed., McGraw-Hill College, (New York, 1999) p. 170
Samuelson et al., Economics: Volume 2 Macro Economics, 3rd ed., McGraw Hill Book Company, (Sydney, 1992), p. 582-83