• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why was there a mutiny in India in 1857?

Extracts from this document...


Nihar Parikh History 10B 28/2/2004 History Coursework 1) Why was there a mutiny in India in 1857? The Indians felt that the British rule was getting a little too dominant. For example, they intended to replace native princes. The leader of the Marathas: Nana Sahib, was denied his titles in 1853 and his pension was stopped. The last of the Moghul emperors, Bahadur Shah II, was told that he would be the end of his dynasty. Doctrine of Lapse was carried out by General Dalhousie and had a law which said the government would seize land if there was no male heir. The British then also abolished "sati" (voluntary or sometimes even forced killing of a widow when their husband dies), and child marrige. Although this may seem civilized of the British to do so, the Indians at the time were very prideful of their tradition and disliked the abolishment of sati and child marriges. ...read more.


The British then sentenced several Indians to jail and hanged one sepoy. Then in Meerut, sepoys refused to use the cartridges and the British then sentenced 85 Sepoys to Fort William to be imprisoned. The Sepoys' friends then shot the British troops stationed at the fort and freed the imprisoned sepoys. Afterwards, all of them marched to Delhi, thus starting the tragic Sepoy Mutiny of 1857. Word Count (excluding parentheses and quotations): 342 2) How far was trade the most important reason for the Scramble for Africa towards the end of the nineteenth century? During the end of the 19th century there was heavy colonisation, Africa saw the most dramatic colonisation. It was divided up as if it had been a cake split between greedy European powers. This was called the "Scramble for Africa". There were many motives for this scramble by the European powers. ...read more.


Britain took the Suez Canal so that it can reach India faster and covering less distance, instead of going around Africa this was a strategic motive. Belgium colonized Congo (which is around 80 times larger than Belgium) to feel prideful and to boast Belgian's reputation, this was a leadership motive. British were extremely confident and had expressed aggression when they fought the Zulus knowing that it would be an easy victory as Britain was technologically far superior (having machine guns) this was an aggressive motive. To say trade was the most important reason for the scramble of Africa would be an exaggeration. It is quite evident that there were many other important motives and although the economic motive might have been a key motive, trade was not. Word Count (excluding parentheses and quotations): 320 Sources of information Indian Mutiny: http://www.lexicorps.com/sepoy.htm - 29/2/2004 http://www.onwar.com/aced/nation/uni/uk/18/findia1857.htm - 29/2/2004 http://www.geocities.com/Broadway/Alley/5443/indmut.htm - 29/2/2004 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_Mutiny - 29/2/2004 Packet: Catchpole, Brian "Imperialism 1800-1914" International School Desktop Publishing, York, 1991 Scramble for Africa: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scramble_for_Africa - 29/2/2004 http://www.postcolonialweb.org/africa/scramble.html - 29/2/2004 http://www.saburchill.com/history/chapters/empires/0048.html - 29/2/2004 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level UK, European & Global Economics essays

  1. A study of Patent system in India in the light of Patent Cooperation Treaty.

    A PCT application provides a convenient way to keep the options open for developing countries and decide with all calculations whether they want to file application in other countries or not. After a long discussion in relation with this issue that is whether PCT give boost to Indian investors?

  2. Why was slavey abolished in the 19th century?

    what this mass petitioning could possibly bring in the form of rebellion. The year after the 1792 petition was presented to Parliament, government officials refused to revive the promises they made to Wilberforce and other campaigners, effectively halting the progress that had been made in the previous years.

  1. Where does the World Trade Organisation fit in the overall scheme of international public ...

    The GATT/WTO is not a substitute for national governance in trade policy; rather, with the right sort of rules, based on MFN and National Treatment, it can be a helpful auxiliary to good national governance.

  2. The Imperial Impulse of Capitalist Greed - THE BELGIAN CONGO

    Belgium's economic and industrial expansion in the mid-to-late 1800's, and the production of monopolistic finance capital, created the need for new continental markets for Belgian investments. Hobson supports this theory, stating that "it is undeniable that the search for lucrative yet secure overseas investments played a very great part in the European urge to acquire colonies" (Hobson, A, 1902).

  1. By the mid nineteenth century, Britain had been the world's strongest economic power for ...

    It is fair to say that the role of the entrepreneur grew more specialised as more and more of the day-to-day management was passed onto their subordinates. M.W. Flinn saw the entrepreneur as the person "who organised production. He it was who brought together the capital (his own or somebody else's)

  2. Colonialism and Colonies.

    However, the native population not only survived, but increased. Native peoples managed to maintain some control over their lives, although their political control was usually slight. Furthermore, their labor remained the backbone of the economy. Eventually, native people were able to successfully contest white control of the colony, both the control by the colonizing country and control by the settlers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work