"A better title for this play would be 'Cleopatra and Antony' because Cleopatra is a dominant character throughout. Indeed, it might simply be called 'Cleopatra'". How far do you agree? How would a Jacobean audience react to her strength of character?

Authors Avatar

“A better title for this play would be ‘Cleopatra and Antony’ because Cleopatra is a dominant character throughout.  Indeed, it might simply be called ‘Cleopatra’”.  How far do you agree?  How would a Jacobean audience react to her strength of character?

Shakespeare structured ‘Antony and Cleopatra’ to mirror a historic love affair between two great characters of the past.  This love affair develops into the most explosive and destructive love story, both Antony and Cleopatra finding themselves trapped between passion and logic, they both prove their limitless love by the ultimate sacrifices they make, Antony’s downfall at the hands of Caesar and Cleopatra losing her beloved Egypt, both dying a ‘noble’ death as the last tragedy of them all.  Cleopatra’s dominancy can be proved by how even when not in a scene she holds this incredible power over what is happening, for example, in Act Two, Scene Two Cleopatra’s determination to fight beside Antony causes Antony to clash with Caesar and Enobarbus, Enobarbus proclaiming “Would we had all such wives, that the men might go to wars with the women!” emphasising how much control she had but is she central to the play?  In recent times, the very people who have studied Cleopatra and her reign in Egypt believe that the real character was never in love with Antony but only interested in the politics, exploiting Antony to prosper herself but exposure of the truth is not the aim of Shakespeare’s play.  Shakespeare manipulates facts, using the medium of drama to portray a love story entangled with the politics and issues at that time; Shakespeare’s main aim is to entertain.  Shakespeare has written a love story in which the audience can get enthralled and leaves them drawing their own conclusions on the characters and their incentive and intentions.

The play is structured into two halves, the first is of Antony’s desire to escape from the grip of ‘Egypt’ and therefore Cleopatra.  Portrayal of their relationship draws a very negative picture of Cleopatra from the outset.  The audience is informed of Antony’s inappropriate behaviour, the head of a large army and great ruler being controlled by a woman.  This makes everyone close to Antony doubt his future, “this dotage of our general’s / O’erflows the measure.”   This is one of many subtle hints to the imminent doom and Cleopatra’s power.  The second half picks up pace, no longer following, as closely, the relationship of Antony and Cleopatra but desolation of their love, the loss of both empires to Caesar.

Join now!

Throughout the play the audience gains so much insight into the real Antony through his reactions to Cleopatra more than we learn of Cleopatra.  Cleopatra is a character who is seen differently by everyone although she is almost an ‘open book’.  Cleopatra is crucial in showing a depth to Antony only brought out when Antony’s heart refuses all self-restraint. His desire for Cleopatra is excessive, producing a transformation from a “pillar of the world” - a firm bearer of the Roman senate, likened to “Mars”, god of war, clad in armour, into “a strumpet’s fool.”  This is seen to be ...

This is a preview of the whole essay