• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain and the First World War, 1914-1918 Sources Questions

Extracts from this document...


Raonull Mackinnon Depth study E: Britain and the First World War, 1914-1918 8) As with most arguments there are two sides to every story. There is evidence to support both sides. On one side there is the argument that the government did in fact knowingly mislead the public as to the conditions of the trenches. Also there is evidence that what they did hold back information but for the good of the country. During four years of the war the government knew how important it would be to keep the morale at home up. Without it the war was lost even before the soldiers had touched the ground in France. Men though were also guilty of censorship as well knowing full well the consequences if their families found out the truth of the horror that they were living through in the trenches. The morale at home would tumble. IN all likely hood the number of recruits would diminish quickly. ...read more.


Source J is a very good indication as to whether or not the government was telling the whole truth or not. From the evidence provided from Seigfreid Sassoon, it points towards a definite no. All government propaganda tells of how glorious and triumphant the men's deaths were or even how relaxed the trench life actually was as in the cigarette advert of source I. Source J is a very reliable source as it's author, Sassoon, was actually there. His graphic depiction of the battlefield suggests heavily that the government did in fact mislead the people of Britain, And in a way quite rightly so. If information as in source J like, "the mask of a human face which had detached itself from the skull", had got home riots would have erupted. That is why the government had to circulate pictures such as source F. The image promotes the bravery and camaraderie of the soldiers. Such things would have kept the soldiers morale up as well in such publications as "for king and country". ...read more.


People needed to be encouraged to work not depressed by the reality of a war that had finished. As always it depends on the origin of the piece. Source H for example is a first hand account of the battle of the Somme. It is first hand because he was actually there. Sixty years later he has given an extremely detailed piece of writing of how his experience at the battle of the Somme. An historian on the other hand was more than likely never they're relying only on the scraps of information being fed to him/her. Writing much later such as sources H and J are affected by hindsight. In 1918 emotions would still have been running high and in winning the war the historian may have been wearing rose tinted glasses. An historian writing much later would have more access to the facts of the event being covered. History reflects the time in which it is written. An historian writing in the aftermath of the first world war would give a very different view to a historian writing much later. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. The Battle of the Somme - source related study.

    During The Big Push, there was 893 deaths, only British deaths, showing the soldiers had a 1 in 4 chance of reaching it back home, which also contradicts Source A. Source D helps in the supporting of the war because it shows the story was told to children of Empire who were the allies.

  2. In what ways did the attitudes of soldiers and civilians change towards the war ...

    Newspapers were only allowed to publish good news about the war although this was not a problem necessarily with mainstream newspapers as their editors and owners were actually among the most supportive of everyone of the war. There was more of a problem with independent papers.

  1. How and Why did war poetry change during the years 1914 - 1918

    They believed it was an adventure that would take them around the world and did not think of the consequences. As eyewitness accounts filtered down to the public back in England of the horrific circumstances, such as the lack of food, bad weather, poor living conditions and disease ridden trenches,

  2. Propaganda, Recruitment and Resistance: The Home Front 1914-1918

    Other chose not to volunteer on the moral or religious grounds. The Quakers did not volunteer because they did not believe the war was the answer. Many other men refused to 'play God', ad take away another mans life. Some men refused to volunteer because they had people at home

  1. The Battle of the Somme 1916

    They were to -gain territory in the area of the Somme -relieve pressure at Verdun by drawing troops away -kill more German soldiers than British At the end of the battle, the British had advanced just 5 kilometres. This is not an impressive figure but at least they did advance a little.

  2. The Battle of the Somme 1916 - source related study.

    trenches was very difficult due to the trenches systems being quite narrow. Also, the wounded soldiers from the front lines were continuously being carried through the trench systems. This made it quite hard for soldiers from the trenches to move forward to the front line to replace the wounded soldiers who would have out of action.

  1. How Did the Blitz Affect Everyday Life in Britain?

    Anderson Shelters were designed for the garden and could be put together with a friend. An Anderson Shelter was made out of steel, and needed to be placed in a hole in the garden that was 1metre deep. The earth over the roof needed to be at least 90cm deep

  2. Women and the war effort in Britain, 1914-1918.

    hostility and sabotage and that they were restricted to less skilled work. Source G contradicts this and says that men and women were friends. If this was so then males would not try to sabotage women's work and act in an unwelcoming manner towards the female employees.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work