• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the presentation of monsters in Bram Stokers Dracula and Mary Shelleys Frankenstein.

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast the presentation of monsters in Bram Stoker's Dracula and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein. The concept of a monster is subject to literary interpretation - werewolves, vampires and manmade abominations all hold the label of monster, and yet a monster can also be a normal-looking person, but with the internal thoughts and warped consciousness such a creature would be considered to possess. Count Dracula cannot be considered to be anything but a monster - he feeds upon the blood of mortals to survive, and plans to wreak a similar havoc upon London and its 'teeming millions'. But can the creation of Victor Frankenstein really be called a monster? Or this time, is it the creator that is deserving of such a title? Count Dracula and Frankenstein's monster both evoke within the reader certain aspects of repulsion and horror. The Count's face is described as 'aquiline' and 'rather cruel-looking, with peculiarly sharp white teeth'. His ears are described as 'pale, and at the tops extremely pointed', and the nails on his hands were 'long and fine, and cut to a sharp point'. All of these references hold connotations of an animal, or more specifically, a predator, and therefore while Dracula seems human in appearance, the reader feels threatened by the rather deceptive way in which the Count elicits fear - outwardly, there is nothing to be frightened of. ...read more.


This can be compared to when Dracula grabs Harker's arm in a 'grip of steel', as both suggest a strong idea manmade creation, which only adds to the unnaturalness of both monsters. In both novels there are constant and reoccurring motifs that somehow link both of the monsters to concepts of the Christian religion. For instance, Count Dracula sleeps in the vicinity of an ancient, ruined chapel. In this and in many other ways, the Count represents a perversion of Christian belief - his diet of blood shockingly parallels the Christian Eucharist, in which believers drink and eat the blood and body of Jesus Christ. In many ways, Dracula perversely parallels Christ himself: like Christ, he has died and been reborn, but his resurrection is a blasphemy, and a manifestation of evil rather then a miracle. While Christ sheds his blood so that others might have eternal life, Dracula drinks the blood of others so that he himself might live eternally: 'on the lips were gouts of fresh blood, which trickled from the corners of the mouth and ran down over the chin and neck'. His immortality is a mockery of life; he is not truly immortal but 'undead', a term that Stoker himself used. ...read more.


In conclusion, there are both interesting similarities and stark differences between the presentation of Frankenstein's monster and Count Dracula - both are used to elicit feelings of fear and repulsion, one, through the method of quiet, brooding menace and coldly calculating evil, while the other uses loud and obvious imagery to challenge and frighten the reader by rendering a grotesque spectacle of physical difference. Both monsters are also used to represent and mock certain figures in the religion of Christianity, a theory that is both credible and possible, given the time and context in which both novels were written, perhaps to inspire and dissuade a God-fearing public from going against the tenets of Christianity. But perhaps the most interesting theme that links the novels together is the conflict between nature versus nurture - Dracula is a wholly evil creature; yes, an evil creature with a warped sense of 'justice', but an evil creature nonetheless. But can the same really be said for the creation of Victor Frankenstein, who is torn between vengefulness and compassion for his creator? The reader feels nothing but abject repulsion and horror towards Dracula, but for the creation of Dr. Frankenstein, we are more likely to feel pity - pity for what has been lost and what could have been, and perhaps even pity for what should never have been at all. Kurt Shead MTG: C ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Other Criticism & Comparison section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Other Criticism & Comparison essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The English Patient

    5 star(s)

    Once he did this, he set to work on figuring out the "joke" to the b**b. Eventually he realized it: the Germans had put a second gaine, a whole separate device into the b**b to make it very difficult to defuse.

  2. Ambition in "The Duchess of Malfi" and "Paradise Lost"

    Ambition is said to be the cause of a man's downfall. "Hereafter, you may, wisely cease to grieve for that which cannot be recovered" is shown to highlight that ambition is the cause of suffering, which you "grow mad in it" through "your own guilt".

  1. A Critique of Society in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    Also, Frankenstein's mother never has a career and is seen to put all her efforts into looking after her children. Women are seen as possessions, for men to protect; Frankenstein explains 'She presented Elizabeth to me as her promised gift.

  2. Compare and Contrast the presentation on Edmund and Edgar in Sheakespeare's King Lear

    The motives for adopting a new persona and level in the social order completely contrast and reveal a lot about their personalities; Edgar who is humane and generous and Edmund who is manipulative and spiteful. It is interesting, that in their speeches, that Edmund is the one that asks for help.

  1. Compare and contrast the presentation of sex and sexuality in The Color Purple by ...

    Letter 60 portrays this further as sewing is pictured as an activity that unites women. Celie's replies to Shug's suggestion of making and wearing pants are "I ain't no man" and "Mr. not going to let his wife wear pants".

  2. Literary theory- new historicism applied to Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein"

    explains that to appreciate the purpose and true depth of a text critiques must ?understand the work through its historical context and to understand cultural and intellectual history through literature?(Felluga). In his work The History of Sexuality (1976), Foucault builds on the idea of history as a chain of major

  1. With detailed analysis of Mary Shelleys Frankenstein and with wider reference to Bram Stokers ...

    The word ?convulses? also suggests electricity, interestingly this suggests Shelly may have been influenced by scientific advantages like Galvanism. The colour ?black? emphasises the gothic lexis and links to death and evil. This entrance to the world is presented as unnatural as Victor hubristically usurps the role of God with

  2. Compare and contrast American playwrights presentation of masculinity in Death of a Salesman, Whos ...

    youngster, a successful debater and basketball star and Biff the popular football captain. Both had massive popularity due to their athletic success and in the case of Biff his success made him above the law being excused by his father of his theft of the ball as the ?coach liked

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work