• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast the treatment of emigration and rural life in “The Country Boy” by John Murphy and “Philadelphia, Here I Come” by Brian Freill.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ENGLISH COURSEWORK - EMIGRATION Q. Compare and contrast the treatment of emigration and rural life in "The Country Boy" by John Murphy and "Philadelphia, Here I Come" by Brian Freill. A. Emigration has been, and still is, a major factor in Ireland. It has been ever since the famine of 1845. Over one million people left Ireland to go to The United States Of America, and Irish people have been leaving ever since. It used to be that everyone who left, were leaving due to unemployment or lack of opportunities, but these days, even though there are a lot more jobs available and the economy is at its best ever, people are still leaving. It seems they are leaving to find adventure. They think Ireland is too small and too boring a place to spend the rest of your life in. I will be looking at two plays which deal with emigration. The first is "The Country Boy" and the second is "Philadelphia, Here I Come". In both plays, the writer shows that boys haven't got a very good relationship with their fathers. There is a lack of communication between the father and son, and although they seem to get on with each other, they aren't very close. Although, Curly seems to have a better relationship with his father than Gar has with his father. ...read more.

Middle

Curly Says; "Even though I'll be on that plane tomorrow, I'll have my doubts." Both father and son do love each other but are unable to show it. Gar wants to talk to his father badly, but is unable to express himself. "Keep at it, the silence is the enemy." The fathers also seem to want their sons to stay, but again, they either are unable or too stubborn to say it. We see this as Eddie says; "They're too proud to get down on their knees and ask you to stay." Madge says (referring to S.B); "Just because he doesn't say much doesn't mean he hasn't got feelings like the rest of us." There are a number of reasons why both boys want to go to America. For Gar, it is the fact that Ballybeg is a small town with not much going for him. It has a snobbish, small-minded attitude and it is boring. Nothing exciting ever happens. He can't fulfil, what he believes, to be his full potential. Another reason would be his failed relationship with Katy Doogan. He was going to marry her, but hadn't got the backbone to stand up to Katie's father. She is now married to Dr. Francis King in Ballybeg. I think, he thinks, he wouldn't be able to handle seeing his one true love all the time, with another man. ...read more.

Conclusion

Although, ultimately, Gar doesn't really wasn't to go, he feels he has no real choice. "Good boy! Why do you have to leave? Why?" "I don't know." Curly on the other hand, stays and seems to gain his independence, with his father handing over the farm to him. This and the fact he is in love with Eilleen and is going to marry her, is the reason he stays. He had a lot to stay for, whereas Gar, who desperately wanted to stay, has to leave. "But its no good shouting anymore, you've got to hand over sometime." I enjoyed both plays and enjoyed reading them but I think that "Philadelphia, Here I Come" shows a more accurate portrayal than "The Country Boy" because I think it shows a more realistic side of what it would be like for a young boy emigrating. Mostly they would've went and the way Gar has nothing to stay for is more real life, whereas "The Country Boy" shows more of a "...and they lived happily ever after" fairytale style ending, where Curly stays, marries his true love, gets the farm and gains his independence. It all just seems to good to be true. So, in conclusion, I think both plays were very good, but I think "Philadelphia, Here I Come" is a more accurate portrayal Sean Mc Quade 11B ?? ?? ?? ?? - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Seamus Heaney section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Seamus Heaney essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Analyse how Seamus Heaney uses language to convey his childhood experiences to the reader ...

    3 star(s)

    In the second verse we learn that the berries had gone bad "The sweet flesh would turn sour." But the child seems to be growing up as he is not although he says: " I always felt like crying, it wasn't fare " This shows that even though he is

  2. Explore Heaney's Presentation Of The Irish Conflict In, "Whatever You Say, Say Nothing"

    This is the view that the rest of the world has on the Irish conflict and it is used last in this snippet list to maybe show that this is the one view that Heaney believes in himself. His previous poems deal with how the Irish are divided amongst themselves and cannot let go of the past.

  1. Follower is a poem about the poets love and admiration for his father. It ...

    This part of the poem is ambiguous - we see the horror of the plague of frogs, "obscene" and "gathered...for vengeance", as it appeared to the young boy. But we can also see the scene more objectively - as it really was.

  2. Using two of Heaney's poems, compare them for treatment of theme and style, noting ...

    He also talks of how his teacher encouraged his childish interest in the process. In the second section, Heaney outlines how the frogs, in huge numbers, had taken over the flax-d*m, wanting revenge on him, to punish him for his na�ve crime.

  1. Seamus Heaney.

    In August of 1965 he married Marie Devlin. The following year he became a lecturer in modern English literature at Queen's College, Belfast, his first son Michael was born, and Faber and Faber published Death of a Naturalist. This volume earned him the E.C. Gregory Award, the Cholmondeley Award in 1967, the Somerset Maugham Award in 1968, and the Geoffrey Faber Memorial Prize, also in 1968.

  2. Show how the Writer deals with the social consequences of emigration on the live ...

    He cannot bear to stay in the house surrounded by dancing and singing while his heart is breaking. "He could make nothing at all of his thoughts, but a lump always came up his throat, and he shivered although the night was warm."

  1. Drawing examples from a range of poems discuss Heaney's treatment of what he has ...

    in the privileged position occupied by Heaney, as he has the luxury of being able to sit by and observe his father labouring outside. Here, Heaney remembers growing up with his father and again this shows that this poem is concerned with both attachments and memory.

  2. What influence of history can be seen in Seamus Heaney's work?

    'They buried us without shroud or coffin' is a distinctive line because it seems like 'They buried' all Ireland when this monstrosity was committed. Irish people today still have the psychological scars from their history being 'buried without shroud or coffin', this refers to the burying of the memories of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work