• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast Wilfred Owen's "Dulce et Decorum Est and Shakespeare's Speech From Henry V.

Extracts from this document...


Compare and Contrast Wilfred Owen's "Dulce et Decorum Est and Shakespeare's Speech From Henry V It is terribly ironic that in the current international crisis over war I may be analysing two pieces with very contrasting views on the subject. Where Shakespeare glorifies the art of war and the honour surrounding it, Owen devalues a respected Latin phrase, which tells of the honour of war. I will first interpret Owen's poem (Dulce et Decorum Est), and later move on to Shakespeare's piece, and finally compare the two. Owen, himself fought and died in the First World War, and in all his poetry, (which is all war poetry) he conveys the terrifying horror of war. Owen said "The poetry is in the pity" meaning that he did not worry about the popularity of his poems, it was just his means of communication to the public allowing him to transmit the lasting pain caused by war, and dispel any thoughts that war is full of pride and shining uniforms. He starts the first stanza describing the terrible state of the men, he conveys the men as gender less and old. The contrast of this from when they left, with boots gleaming, mood high and now "bent double like old beggars", and "cursed through sludge". This also contrasts greatly with the image of the men marching confidently, shoulders back and chest puffed out, instead they are bent over like old women. He also mentions "hags" this word is usually used to describe old women. In the next line Owen says "on the haunting flares we turned our backs" this tells us the terrible physical state of the ...read more.


He continues to depict the terrible image by using phrases such as "incurable sores on innocent tongues" and "froth-corrupted lungs", these create image of the body no longer being under the control of the man. The last two lines, are completely directed at the reader, playing on the guilt he has most certainly built up throughout the poem, he says "My friend" this is written in a sarcastic and bitter tone, were we are not really his friend, as we have put these men through these horrors. He then goes on " you would not tell with such high zest to children ardent for some desperate glory" this again is playing on the guilt of the reader. He then disgraces and devalues a very respected Latin line written by the old poet Ovid " Dulce et decorum est Pro patria mori" this means "it is sweet and fitting to die for your native land". While devaluing this statement, he is also devaluing war in itself, and he uses this last verse in a last gasp effort to appeal to the reader in a much more obvious way than all the other verse, through grotesque images. The most important component to the last verse, is that the tension is built in tremendous fashion. He achieves this by using only a single sentence in the whole verse, of which you only get the full meaning at the end of the sentence, which is that it is not sweet and fitting to die for your native land. This is a superb ending, and leaves the reader exactly how he would have wanted, thinking how is it possible for countries in this day in age to go to war. ...read more.


Both use specific events in Owen's case it was the death of a man from a gas attack and for Henry it was the oncoming war. The man in the poem was completely anonymous leading the audience to believe that it could be anyone, even them, whereas in the speech there is constantly names mentioned, letting the audience warm to the characters. You can constantly feel Owen's hatred of war and spite of anyone who puts people through it, however Henry is one of these people instilling exactly what Owen ridicules, the honour of dying for your country. In the poem the men have lost everything that makes them human, whereas in the speech they are going to gain what every human wants the respect of his fellow species. The end of the poem is a monosyllabic pounding "my friend you would not tell with such high zest" instils the poet's hatred for war, whereas Henry's speech is obviously building to a climax. The poem starts bleak, and ends bleaker, however the speech starts bleak but ends on a triumphant note. I actually prefer the poem, it is the most inspiring poetry I have ever read, and it perfectly recreates the image of the man dying, and lets you feel the poets hatred for war. However a good speaker can change the mind of even the most stubborn person, or at least make them think. Owen I am sure would be disgusted that nearly a century on from his death in a war we would be facing another, he would be most disappointed that his poetry had no effect. I think that if everyone stepped back they could most certainly find another solution, however in today's impatient society they want everything now. Chris Gallagher ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level War Poetry section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

The essay writer is very sensitive to the quite different sentiments of the 'voices' in these two texts. Quotations are well chosen, and often quite skillfully introduced into the sentence structure of the essay. The linguistic analysis is well conducted generally, with a good comparison of the thrust of the two works.

Sentence and paragraph structure are loose and punctuation is frequently inadequate. As the essay writer says, both of these texts are poetry but little is said to compare the poetic devices and the effects they have on the reader.

More could be said of the very different contexts. In the Battle of Agincourt, the fighting was over in the day (though it was one episode in the Hundred Year's War), in The First World War, the trench warfare dragged on for 4 years, hence the gradual erosion of morale and spirit.

3 stars

Marked by teacher Jeff Taylor 10/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level War Poetry essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare the presentation of the psychological effects of war on the individual in 'Regeneration' ...

    5 star(s)

    The negativity expressed by Hardy " I never did see a youngster put away the whiskey he does" informs the audience of Stanhope's alcoholism, and also influences any preconceptions they may have. Throughout the play we see the effect the war has had on Stanhope, and the alcoholism that has escalated.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    A Comparison of "Who's for the Game" and "Dulce et Decorum est".

    3 star(s)

    She creates this happy and jolly atmosphere by using an effective rhythmic rhyme scheme AbAb. This rhythm is stable and reliable throughout. This makes the poem sound light hearted. Pope refers to the country being in need. This is done by using lines such as: "Who'll give his country a hand"?

  1. This paper describes a design-based effort to build an effective closed-system air standard gas ...

    When this assumption is utilized, the air-standard assumptions are called the cold-air-standard assumptions. A cycle for which the air-standard assumptions are applicable is frequently referred to as an air-standard cycle. The air-standard assumptions previously stated provide considerable simplification in the analysis without significantly deviating from the actual cycles.

  2. POETRY ANALYSIS: Dulce Et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen and My Lai by David ...

    The structure of the poem is made up of 5 stanzas each made up of 4 lines. This free verse poem uses enjambment between the lines making the rhythm seem uneven and disjointed. This effective use of word painting gives the reader a sense of how fast and disjointed the protagonist was thinking.

  1. Iain Crichton Smith's short story "The Telegram" - summary

    They "think of the telegram as a missile pointed at then from abroad," causing pain and suffering for which they know no reason.

  2. Compare The Soldier and Dulce et Decorum Est

    to war and die for one's country but in contrast to Owen tells the reader that this is a lie and there is nothing glorious in dying for your country. In this essay I have shown that The Soldier and Dulce et Decorum Est portray war and death from different perspectives.

  1. The diffusion of Ammonia Gas

    This is where the experiment undermines my prediction but it can also support it as I said that it would take a longer time for the gas to diffuse upwards than it would downwards. Well this isn't true but I was correct on the timing of the ammonia gas as

  2. The themes, techniques and reader response to the First World War poetry of Wilfred ...

    For instance the graphic description of 'wading sloughs of flesh' recalls the deep, muddied trenches strewn with corpses and remains, and in 'Dulce Et Decorum Est' the horrific image of the gassed soldier, 'plunging' at Owen, 'guttering, choking, drowning'. Owen achieves such clarity in his poetry often though the use of alliteration and onomatopoeia.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work