Compare the attitudes of patriotic and realistic poems towards the war.

Authors Avatar

Moinuddin Patel

Compare the attitudes of patriotic and realistic poems towards the war.

World war one took place from 1914 to1918 and was between the allies that included Britain and France against the Ottoman Empire that included Germany and Austria. The war had a big impact on the modern world because it affected nearly every country in the world.

The poems the government used to encourage young men to fight were patriotic poems these were used because there was no sign of the realities of war in there. The government also prevented the truth leaving the battlefield by using a censor, Wilfred Owen was a censor, his duty was to read al the letters sent by soldiers and cross off all the things which gave a negative view of the war.

Because Wilfred own was a censor no one read his letters, so then he and some soldiers began to right poems about war as it really was. These are called realistic poems since they show the realities of war.

Join now!

‘Dulce ET Decorum Est.’ and ‘Disabled’ are realistic poems and ‘into battle’ and ‘who’s for the game’ are patriotic poems. ‘Dulce et Decorum Est.’ and ‘disabled’ were both written by Wilfred Owen who was in the war and had experience of the war. Julian Grenfell who had no experience of war wrote the poem ‘into battle’. Jessie Pope who also had no experience of the war wrote ‘ who’s for the game’. Both poems ‘who’s for the game’ and ‘ into battle’ were used and taken as recruiting poems which would try and encourage young men to join and ...

This is a preview of the whole essay