Compare the protagonists' opinions on conflict and how their experiences affect them in 'First Casualty' by Ben Elton and 'A Long Long Way' by Sebastian Barry

Authors Avatar

Compare the protagonists’ opinions on conflict and how their experiences affect them in ‘First Casualty’ by Ben Elton and ‘A Long Long Way’ by Sebastian Barry

The two novels I have chosen both explore similar themes. Both are of the bildungsromane genre, but the development of the characters is cleverly intertwined with the events of the Great War. This is interesting on several levels, because at times, the trials and tribulations of the characters seem insignificant when faced with the magnitude of world war, and at other times, seem almost to drown out the shot and shell. ‘First Casualty’ is the story of Douglas Kingsley, a respected policeman who objects to the ‘illogical’ war, is imprisoned, but his death is faked and he is forced to France to solve the murder of a homosexual, aristocratic war hero. In ‘A Long Long Way’ the protagonist Willie Dunne, is a simple young Irishman who enlists in the British Army, but along the way, is forced to question his beliefs on love, war and the Irish Republican cause. I am going to explore and compare how the protagonists experience war, and how this experience changes them, and their perspectives.

Even though they begin from different points in the men’s lives, both novels convey the strength of their opinions on the war. In ‘First Casualty’ Kingsley is in fact in the dock over his beliefs- he conscientiously objects to the war, but not war in general ‘I accept that there are men I would be prepared to kill. I accept there are wars I would be prepared to fight. All I can tell you sir, is that the German Army does not contain those men and this war is not one of those wars’ This is quite indicative of his character, showing he carefully contemplates his actions, especially those which could lead him into danger or death – this does not make him a coward, but one unswayed by the mass of public feeling and patriotic jingoism that was sweeping the nation. It is to me, a harder thing to stand and resist the flow than be swept along by it. Conversely in the other novel, Willie is sure the war needs to be fought, albeit not quite sure why this is so: ‘it was difficult for him to explain to her why it was so, because it was difficult to put into words for himself’. His father’s opinion is that ‘It was King and Country and Empire’, but ‘never thinking his son Willie would go so soon as he did’. Willie said ‘he would go to please his father’ and tells his sweetheart ‘it was because he loved her he had to go, that there were women like her being killed by the Germans in Belgium, and how could he let that happen?’. Willie is a good example of the men who answered their country’s call, although ignorant of the whys and wherefores, he goes because he and others around him perceive it as his ‘duty’. Government propaganda and the media would have had a lot to do with this, with posters such as ‘Women of Britain say GO!’ and the like. It can be safely assumed that the worldlier and less impressionable Kingsley would not be affected by such posters, seeing them for the instruments of recruitment and destruction that they were. This is not to insult the Willie’s intelligence, or that of the millions of other men that joined up, but more sign of the times, such posters today would doubtless affect the youth of today significantly less.

 Kingsley makes it clear that he can see why violence is often necessary; indeed he has sent several men (and three women) to the gallows through his duties as a police inspector: ‘I have, however, slept soundly in the knowledge that those men and the three women who were condemned to death as a result of my investigations were all heartily deserving of their fate’ - this is a key insight into Kingsley - he opines that there are those who deserve death, but only wrongdoers (however he has not actually killed, only caused the death of the criminals). He admits there are times when he would and has used violence to solve problems, but disagrees with the reasons behind the Great War, stating it ‘This war is… stupid. It offends my sense of logic. It offends my sense of scale’. His views land him in prison, branded a coward and a shirker, but in the end, the reader must ask does it take more courage to fight and risk death or injury for a wrong cause, or have the strength to stand up for your convictions, even if it means being vilified by your peers? Although Willie has no clear opinions on conflict, he joins the British Army because he believes that by fighting, he will prevent the girl he loves from being treated like he believes Belgian women are being treated by the invading Germans. There is also some mention made of his fellow Irishmen, the author makes the clear distinction between the Republicans, who join Britain’s Army in the hope that their sacrifice will achieve Home Rule, and the Ulstermen, who join with precisely the opposite in mind. Both protagonists encounter several levels of understanding and commitment to the War, and conflict in general.

Join now!

However, in contrast, there are several characters using the conflict to achieve their own goals, such as the fascinating character of Captain Shannon in ‘First Casualty’, whose personal mantra is ‘any drink, any meal, any girl, anytime’. Captain Shannon has had his opinions hardened by war, has come to accept his death. He tells Kingsley ‘So when that bullet finally finds its billet, or I’m gassed, or shit myself to death with dysentery or I’m blown to bits or drowned in the mud or just keel over with plain funk I shall know that there was never a single ...

This is a preview of the whole essay