Compare two poems about eating in public. Eating out and The Sweet Menu

Authors Avatar by pm1234567 (student)

Compare two poems about eating in public.

       ‘Eating out’ and ‘The Sweet Menu’ are both poems written to educate and entertain the educated classes about modern life; however ‘Eating Out’ uses formal language and details how this person is extremely lonely and really wishes he could have someone to talk to whereas ‘The Sweet Menu’ relates to how another person is completely surrounded by people and how she wishes to be alone.

       Both texts ‘Eating Out’ and The Sweet Menu’ use graphology for effect. The text ‘Eating Out’ is written in non-rhyming couplets (‘When the proper time came, he initiated me...Into the ritual consumption of lobster.’) which reflect her monotony, discomfort and awkwardness. Moreover, the couplets soon die out at the end of the poem (Humble, I’ll have whatever you’re having, dear.’), which could indicate a new identity being born. Collectively, this use of couplets could suggest a dysfunctional relationship between the parent and child and a desire for connection but failure in doing so. Furthermore, the writer uses Caesura (‘to recover.  Later’) which creates a sense of a disjoint relationship and uncomforting environment giving the audience an impression of the writer being angry and disappointed.

Join now!

       On the other hand, the text ‘The Sweet Menu’ also uses unrhymed couplets (‘the pizza hot a peppery. The ceiling is made up of panels of glass’) but in this situation perhaps reflecting his isolation, brokenness and desire for a companion. The use of couplets could also imply he wants to be with someone and share out his loneliness. In addition to that, the poem ends with a single sentence, ‘it hasn’t come to much.’ This could exhibit not only a realisation that he is all alone but also his hope dying.

       Both texts ...

This is a preview of the whole essay