Dulce Et Decorum Est - review.

Authors Avatar
Dulce Et Decorum Est

Owen's attitude to war is justified by the title and the language used in the poem. He is anti-war. He uses the Latin title ironically to show his aim, that the translation of:

"Dulce Et Decorum Est"

Is a false saying. It is not good and proper or sweet and fitting to die for their country, it is a lie as he points out in the final 3 lines:

"To children ardent for some desperate glory, the old Lie: Dulce Et Decorum Est Pro Patria mori"

He tries to teach those that in turn teach their young to fight, that dying for their country, their Queen isn't right, he shows how the eager children:

"Desperate for some ardent glory"

Are actually excited and fuelled by the dreams put into their minds, of fame, heroism and power, these children absorb these stories, the propaganda spoon fed to them as fuel. It fuels the idealist mind of a child and this would lead them to further believe and trust in those stories and never reject the lie growing within them till they enlist for the army and discover the truth hidden from them for so long, that war is hopeless, war is horrid, war is mankind's creation. They will grow to learn the frightening effects and results of a war and it is this, which Owen hopes to prevent.

Latin in this poem is extremely significant; the phrase is the idea behind Owens poem, the lesson he sets out to teach. Latin is a dead language but was spoken by, many countries during the times of the Roman Empire. Owen for the sake of this poem revives it. In my view he is using the Latin as a metaphor for war, Latin is dead!

Owen suggests the propaganda of the past presents inexplicably false stories with no real truth behind them. Owen is angry at those who would do this even if they have a good intention or if they are under orders to do so, to put in a little truth because constantly feeding lies work help them if they are eventually confronted by those who know the truth and want the truth to be heard. Owen puts this message out and he is unbiased. He tells it from his view and not someone else's. eHeHe is believable and those that read his work know that. I know that I haven't experienced war but in my view Owen is as straightforward as anyone could be when telling a story of war and its savagery and potential for total destruction.

The first 2 lines of Owen's poem help to establish the mood. It's very sombre, sad and dreary and this is supported by the words:

"Bent double"

"Knock-Kneed"

"Cursed"

"Sludge"

The dreary and sombre mood is set by sludge. Sludge being the muddy ground on which they have to

Tread. Sludge is a strong word because it can have a dark evil quality to it as if it could swallow them up. "Knock kneed" is a phrase of pain. They can't walk without banging their knees together, which shows how they are having trouble getting through the sludge. "Bent Double" and "Cursed" means they have been overworked and cursed to this land of unspeakable conditions and terror, they are haunted by the ever-closing threat of attack, "gas shells". The tone in the first 2 lines is slow, gloomy and very sad it is also shown by the words used for the mood and is mainly conveyed by the words "cursed through sludge" and "old beggars". The "slow" would be shown by how they are wounded, tired and probably dying, they are only thinking of one thing, rest and even a chance to die in peace, they are desperate but they won't get what they want as they are faced with the ever present threat of attack and imminent death.

Owens views are juxtaposed to those of Tennyson's in a manner of truth. Owen is telling the story from the first person perspective and he makes sure to include every detail possible to make his point valid whilst Tennyson is writing in the third person with no real evidence to make his points. He's really only writing from what little information he can find whilst constantly lying and presenting the reader with a voyeur's view on war. A piece of propaganda with no backing, no evidence to support his points and no truth whatsoever in the poems content. Owen and Tennyson's poems are completely opposite in every possible way, even by way of the writer, Tennyson poet laureate for Britain at home writing propaganda for his Queen and Owen out there on the front line fighting for his country recording the details he is witness to. That's what makes Owen's the better choice for a poem to be analysed and commented on. It is truly inspirational and true.
Join now!


Owen from the start gives us an image, not glorified, not a roaring ferocious charge but a slow-paced struggle. He uses words like "hags" and "cursed" showing how like witches they were cursed to this domain of suffering and fighting. Their way, not through battle but through the sludge, the muddy ground torn up by shells and the soldiers who went before them.

In stanza 2 there is sibilance. The constant use of the "s" to back up the hissing of the gas as it silently made out to kill those only wanting food and rest. Owen ...

This is a preview of the whole essay