• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss the view that The Great Gatsby and 1984 concern the attempt of an impossible idealism to realise itself in a grossly materialistic world.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss the view that The Great Gatsby and 1984 concern the attempt of an impossible idealism to realise itself in a grossly materialistic world. What was it that finally brought Gatsby down? The title to this novel seems odd in relation to the way he finally passed: the "great" Gatsby killed over one woman's death, for which he accepted all blame even though he was innocent. His final demise could be credited to a dream that had soured, though he was so infatuated with achieving a long-desired aspiration that he would do anything to secure it. His dream of course was Daisy. Similarly the character Winston smith, the main protagonist in George Orwell's '1984' ultimately sacrifices himself for a similar cause, an unattainable longing for freedom and the love of a woman, both novels share a common theme that is a society where social class takes all precedence. ...read more.

Middle

The first settlers were mainly religious refugees who had been driven to the "New World" by persecution. To these settlers America represented to them a new hope, a new life of freedom holding some promise of spiritual and material happiness. Even to those that were not especially religious, America still represented a great opportunity: a land of possibilities. In these early days, material propriety and progress kept pace with the religious and spiritual goals of the time as the founders; the Puritans and the Quakers both approved of the advancement of industry. This however is quite paradoxical to the situation in Oceania in 1984, The majority of the populace is content with their situation of slavery and poverty, brainwashed into ignorance. Only a few individuals share the desire for liberation, known as "the brotherhood". The character Winston smith is a parallel with Jay Gatsby in that he is striving for the un-attainable. ...read more.

Conclusion

Corruption is common on all levels and the party elite wallow in luxuries. For instance, Joseph Stalin's standard of living was remarkably extravagant and probably exceded most Western presidents' and kings'. Milan Simecka, a dissident in communist Czechoslovakia, suggests in Our Comrade Winston Smith that this is the fundamental principle of totalitarian systems: the hunger for the fruits of power. Comfort, luxuries and other expressions of materialism have always been the engine in societies throughout history and why should totalitarian societies be different? Totalitarian societies are more materialistic than other societies, even extreme consumption societies like USA. Creative arts and religion are restricted or even surpressed; utilitarianism and pragmatism leaven all through the totalitarian society. There are no such things as art or beauty as we know it, only insipid Party buildings and propaganda statues. Physical strength is idolised, athletics and body culture is encouraged. It is not a coincidence the Soviet Union and the People's Republic of China have been so successful in various sports. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level George Orwell section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

This essay engages at an average level with this task. There isn't much evidence of a coherent argument being formed here. In my opinion, this question is quite cryptic and this is often for a good reason. The examiners want ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This essay engages at an average level with this task. There isn't much evidence of a coherent argument being formed here. In my opinion, this question is quite cryptic and this is often for a good reason. The examiners want you to engage with the key words of the question, such as "impossible idealism" and "grossly materialistic world". By looking at connotations and meanings, you are able to focus your argument and form convincing points. This essay explores idealism and materialistic word, looking at how it is presented by each writer, but there is no overarching argument. Especially at A-Level, you will gain little credit if your answer is not tightly focused on the question.

Level of analysis

The analysis here is basic. At A-Level, there is a great focus on analysis of language, form and structure, where evaluating how these shape meanings will gain you top marks. There is very little discussion of Fitzgerald or Orwell using techniques to display the idealism. Sentences such as "Fitzgerald uses Nick's distant narrative position" or "Orwell constructs the Party to be oppressive to show" will ensure that you focus on techniques. This essay includes comments such as "Jay Gatsby fights against the social hierarchy" which focus more on the plot and what goes on, rather than how the writers shape the story. Yes, this essay includes some insightful comments, drawing upon critics and quotations. But, these interpretations will gain little credit unless the analysis is there as a foundation. This essay gets sucked into giving too much background information. Information "In these early days, material propriety and progress kept pace with the religious and spiritual goals of the time as the founders; the Puritans and the Quakers both approved of the advancement of industry." is completely irrelevant, unless you comment upon how this affects the context of reception or production. By this, I mean talking about how contemporary audiences would react differently, or how a genre affects how the reader perceives the text. Bulky paragraphs of historical information simply break up any argument you are building.

Quality of writing

The quality of argument here is poor. As mentioned above, there is no overarching argument. This is clear by the lack of introduction, which would be a good opportunity to engage with the question and pose a convincing viewpoint. Paragraphs haven't got concise signposts summarising the points about to be made, and it is very difficult to identify why some points are relevant to the question whatsoever. Examiners will find it much easier to follow an argument if paragraphs are logically picked and are always focused on the question. Unfortunately, this essay just seems like a jumble of points and shows little ability to craft a strong essay.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by groat 21/04/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level George Orwell essays

  1. An Analysis of the free radio as various symbols and the messages it symbolises ...

    Salman Rushdie also suggests that now, nobody adheres to advice from the elderly. This is seen in the beginning "But who listens to the wisdom of the old today?" The choice of utilising Teacher Sahib as the narrator is key to us seeing his perspectives and how if only Ramani

  2. A Critique of Society in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein

    The De Lacey's are hard working, noble and pure of heart, however their kindness and generosity count for nothing in society. They are impoverished; in comparison to Frankenstein who is selfish, arrogant and thoughtless yet lives in luxury and wealth.

  1. Chance, Accident and Coincidence in The Mayor of Casterbridge

    cage "under a bush outside", where other people will hardly find the bird, as "it was by no means easy to set about discovering Henchard". Here again, we rely on anybody, especially Elizabeth, to stumble upon the goldfinch so that Elizabeth will change her mind and forgive Henchard.

  2. The Use of The Four Elements in The Wars

    "Men and horses sank from sight. They drowned in mud. Their graves, it seemed, just dug themselves and pulled them down."(Findley 76) Robert had a close encounter with this most treacherous mud. Water is another essential element for life. We use it to stay hydrated, and to clean ourselves, and our food.

  1. Thrill of the Kill Comparative Essay. Imagine being on a deserted island with ...

    In humans, fear of death brings out the raw need to survive. In the short story, Rainsford was willing to do whatever it takes to ensure his survival, even if it meant killing his pursuers. The hunted sink to the same level as the hunters because it is kill or be killed.

  2. In what ways are Gatsby and George Wilson similar or dissimilar, to whom is ...

    All this mystery serves to stimulate Nick's curiosity, which possibly leads to his more lenient and sympathetic stance when it comes to Gatsby. It also creates a sense of suspense in the reader that heightened Gatsby's entrance into the novel.

  1. Structure of the Novel The Mayor of the Casterbridge

    He haunts Lucetta, Elizabeth and Abel Whittle, for example. But we must not neglect the significance of the will's appearance at the end of story which reveals that he wishes that 'no murners walk behind me' and 'no man remember me'.

  2. Compare the disparate nature of colonial and post colonial societies in "Heart of Darkness" ...

    The result is a focalized account through Lurie's consciousness the effect of which ironically highlights both his but also the typical white male views which he symbolizes in terms of the racial and gender prejudice he displays. In addition to this events which are frequently motivated by discrimination are told

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work