• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explore the presentation of Edmund in 'King Lear'

Extracts from this document...


Explore the presentation of Edmund in 'King Lear' There is all the difference in the world between the evil of Goneril and Regan - dour, stark, and mean-minded - and the evil of Edmund, which has an almost magnificent vitality and elegance. His first appearance in Act 1 reveals all; scorns traditional attitude, establishing himself as a crusader in the cause of amorality. There is tremendous energy and vigour here; martial fidelity and family ties are swept aside. Self-confident and poised, for Edmund a man is what makes himself, especially 'by wit'. His pride in his cunning is justified; Edgar and Gloucester are slickly manipulated, while Cornwall and Regan are smoothly incorporated into his plans other people are there to be used; he uses, when suited, Goneril and Regan against each other. Yet nobody is allowed to use him, as we see when he fights shy of Goneril's suggestion that he should murder Albany. Such single mindedness makes him a successful military leader, concerned with results and not the niceties of principle. Yet we must beware of glamourising this dangerous man, and remind ourselves that he does callously abuse those who are closest to him. He delivers Gloucester into the hands of Cornwall and Regan; he later rides out to apply the final murderous thrust to his own father; he calmly orders the execution of Lear and Cordeila. He is attractive in his zest, perhaps, yet lethally unscrupulous. ...read more.


But his willingness to betray his father indicates just how much he sees other people merely as instruments to be manipulated to his own ends. Edmund claims that the letter is written by Edgar; the letter complains that the young are denied their inheritance for too long, and suggests that Edgar and Edmund should meet to discuss this. Gloucester takes the bait and curses Edgar, whom Edmund pretends to defend, suggesting an arranged test of his loyalty. We see the transition to prose for the conversational exchanges - and Edmund's masterly pose as the respectful son. His performance with the letter is compelling; allowing a brief sight to arouse curiosity, feigning unwillingness to reveal the contents while hinting at their sinisterness, and pretending to defend Edgar, yet blackening his name. The letter focuses upon a central theme; the transfer of power and wealth from the old to the young. It is re-emphasised in Edgar's alleged view that 'sons at perfect age, and fathers declined, the father should be as ward to the son, and the son manage his revenue'. The views, of course, are Edmund's, and will find a harsh echo in the mouths of Goneril and Regan. After the exit of Gloucester, Edmund's philosophy is again projected in his scathing dismissal of his father's beliefs. For him, the stars have no significance; man is what he makes himself, no more, no less. This adds point to his cynical aping of his father after the entry of Edgar. ...read more.


and his capable management of his own fate. The reader comes to deplore Edmund's means, but, hoping for a redemption of Edmund and grasping for a positive message from the play, the reader sees compassion in Edmund's final words, compassion that likely does not exist. Of all of the play's villains, Edmund is the most complex and sympathetic. He is a consummate schemer, a Machiavellian character eager to seize any opportunity and willing to do anything to achieve his goals. However, his ambition is interesting insofar as it reflects not only a thirst for land and power but also a desire for the recognition denied to him by his status as a bastard. His serial treachery is not merely self-interested; it is a conscious rebellion against the social order that has denied him the same status as Gloucester's legitimate son, Edgar. He is the ultimate self-made man, and he is such a cold and capable villain that it is entertaining to watch him work. Only at the close of the play does Edmund show a flicker of weakness. Mortally wounded, he sees that both Goneril and Regan have died for him, and whispers, "Yet Edmund was beloved". After this ambiguous statement, he seems to repent of his villainy and admits to having ordered Cordelia's death. His peculiar change of heart (rare among Shakespearean villains) is enough to make the audience wonder, amid the carnage, whether Edmund's villainy sprang not from some innate cruelty but simply from a thwarted, misdirected desire for the familial love that he witnessed around him. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level King Lear section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level King Lear essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Consider the role of the Fool in King Lear. How important is he ...

    4 star(s)

    Still the Fool is frequently addressed as 'boy' by Lear and the Fool refers to Lear as 'nuncle', showing Lear to be an elderly relative. In a play where family relationships are disastrous, the Fool seems to play the role of the good son.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The influence Act 1 has on the rest of the play in King Lear

    3 star(s)

    tragic downfall, which is already predicted for the remainder of the play. Most of Act 1 is expressing the extent of Lear's madness and the insanity he is displaying when he makes himself exeunt from the two closest to his heart; Kent and Cordelia.

  1. Comparing and contrasting both the characters of Edmund and Edgar In king Lear.

    Edmunds ambition is to make Gloucester hate Edgar. Edmund knows that Gloucester tries too hard to make it clear that he thinks of Edmund as his own son and not a bastard so Edmund takes advantage of it and plays on it quite a lot.

  2. With particular reference to Act 1, Scene 1, show how Shakespeare presents the character ...

    When Kent says that "Lear is mad", this is the first time in the play that we hear the description "mad" in connection with Lear. Although Lear is not actually mad at this point in the play, Shakespeare is giving the audience the idea that he will start to go

  1. If Justice is relative, depending on personal point of view, how can it be ...

    Yet this idea of the virtue rewarded seems absurd in Cordelia's death. Divine justice becomes questionable as Albany pleads: "Gods defend her" shortly before her death, yet she dies. Cordelia's death causes immense affliction to already fragile Lear and eventually becomes his own cause of meeting death.

  2. How does Shakespeare create a sense of unease in Act 1 Scene 1 of ...

    Lear calling in France and Burgundy, and their ensuing conversation borders on the humorous. Lear asserts his dominance with his insults toward his daughter within his very presence- ?infirmities she owes?cursed?.adopted to our hate? and is juxtaposed for effect with the extremely respectful and accommodating language he uses towards his lords.

  1. Describe your view of Shakespeares depiction of the three sisters. What impression do you ...

    The passive role of Albany is certainly shocking for a Jacobean audience unaccustomed to women seizing control and dominance. The pivotal moment when Regan and Gonerill patently invite condemnation is, I believe, Act 2 Scene 4. They are ruthless in their treatment of Lear; once they begin to denigrate his

  2. The Nature of Redemption and the Limits of Pessimism in King Lear

    Considering that King Lear provides numerous instances of these ?painful feelings,? it almost seems nonsensical for Bradley to simply reject their value out of hand. This becomes evident if we extend Bradley?s argument to other areas of aesthetics. For instance, following Bradley?s reasoning, we would have to conclude that the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work