Hiding Villains: Who is to Blame for Tragedy in the Oedipus Cycle

Authors Avatar

 Delia                                                                        

Hiding Villains: Who is to Blame for Tragedy in the Oedipus Cycle

        The Oedipus Cycle tells the legend of cruel destinies destroying three generations of a single family. Often the consequences of his unconscious actions are blamed on Oedipus but the real fault lies with others. The characters that seem of the least importance in the play are the propelling forces behind the entire plot and tragedy. Laius, the chorus, and Fate are entirely responsible for the misfortune and downfall of Oedipus and his relations.

        The tragedy of Oedipus was a destiny cruelly allocated to a man before his birth. The newborn Oedipus was destined to murder his father and marry his mother. The ancient Greeks deeply believed in prophecy and fate, as shown by Laius’ attempt to have his son murdered. Although Laius acted to change this fate, his unsuccessful attempt left him to blame for his son’s misfortune. Laius should have killed the child himself; it is the only way for him to ensure that his own fate is secure. Either, Laius’ own weakness for his child or his fear that interaction with baby Oedipus would cause his death created an opportunity for Fate to fulfill its prophecy.  

Join now!

        When Laius decided the herdsman should murder his son, he should have informed the man of the reasons death was required. The herdsman, who took pity on the poor infant Oedipus, was obviously never informed of the prophecy. This is proved by the herdsman allowing Oedipus to be adopted rather than murdering him. Laius’ explanation for his son’s murder would have emphasized the necessity of Oedipus’ death. If the herdsman had known, then he would have killed the child to save his master’s life. The destruction of many lives could have been spared and although absent from the play, Laius’ ...

This is a preview of the whole essay