• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How does the Requiem reflect the elements of tragedy explored within Death of a Salesman?

Extracts from this document...


How does the Requiem reflect the elements of tragedy explored within Death of a Salesman? In 1949; whilst America saw the culmination of anti-communist feelings, fear of the unknown and the general hysteria which stemmed from the Cold War against Russia; playwright Arthur Miller published what was seen to be a personal criticism of the American way of life, his play, "Death of A Salesman". Death of A Salesman tells the story of w***y Loman, a lowly salesman slowly being estranged from society and increasingly led into confusion by his attempts to escape his own failure brought about by the great American Dream he has served so loyally. It was for this play Miller was brought in front of HUAC (house un-American activities committee) and charged with undermining American Values. Miller defended himself by claiming he simply aspired to "show the truth as [he] saw it". It is because Miller insisted on adhering to realism, that he chose a normal, "Loman", or literally, low man, to be his Tragic Hero. In doing so, Miller broke one rule- that of Aristotelian tragedy, which demands a "noble" hero, of high birth; and simultaneously abided by another, the rule of a Modern Domestic Tragedy which requires an ordinary person's story to be told. ...read more.


It is perhaps important to consider the role of 'ghosts' or past figures which appear throughout the play. Ghosts and figures from the past litter tragedy throughout the centuries. Indeed, the oldest surviving complete tragedy, Aeschylus's Persians (472 BC) features the ghost of the dead King Darius returning from the past to cast judgement over his son Xerxes, whom he deems to be failing in his role and pursuing the wrong dreams. This is not unlike the mocking presence of w***y's own father and his brother Ben, both deceased who continue to taunt w***y with dreams he cannot achieve. w***y's suicide is at once self-congratulating, misguided and selfless. He wants to escape the feeling he is "temporary" by truly leaving something behind, "something one can feel with the hand". This something is his "diamond" of the $20,000 insurance money, which will make him a "hero" for Biff to "worship" and helping Biff to start up a business of his own. Requiem holds no answers as to whether the premium was paid and through this and the melancholy despair that runs through the final scene, Miller shows how pointless w***y's death truly was. No matter how much money he leaves behind, it will never compensate for the loss the family has to endure. ...read more.


Everything reverting back to the way the play started shows how insignificant w***y's death really is. Capitalism does not crumble, life goes on. It is here that I believe Modern Domestic Tragedies are flawed, where Shakespearian ones are not. When Macbeth dies, the audience is certain that his Kingdom will mourn his loss, however warped he was, he was still their King. There will be a "massive" funeral, of the sorts w***y dreams of, and a Kingdom-wide expression of collective grief. It is this grief that I believe provides the catharsis of emotion for the audience, they know his death will continue to be felt after they leave the theatre and this assurance brings closure. This closure however, does not exist in Modern Domestic Tragedies. w***y's death will go unnoticed by most, and this does not bring significant catharsis to the audience. There is no final completion of raw emotion. To support my view I can only offer the words of Shakespeare himself, "The poor beetle on which we tread In corporal sufferance feels a pang as great As when a Giant dies." Or in other words, an ignoble death such as w***y's is just as pitiful as those of Shakespeare's noble giants and therefore I feel robbed of a glorious ending for w***y which would lift him to the level of Kings, as unfitting as it may be. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Arthur Miller section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

This essay only begins to respond to the question half way through! When the question is specifically asking you about a scene in a play, you must begin your argument there, and then use other parts of the play to ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This essay only begins to respond to the question half way through! When the question is specifically asking you about a scene in a play, you must begin your argument there, and then use other parts of the play to back up any points formed. I would be wary of starting an essay on the whole play being a tragedy when the question is so specific. When the essay begins to look at the Requiem, there is some good discussion. Looking at irony and the cyclical nature of Willy's death are great ways to explore tragedy, but this needs to be taken further to discuss how the audience respond to this.

Level of analysis

The analysis here has potential. Comments such as "However, a few critics complain that Willy cannot be a tragic hero" are good, but I would note you should be careful not to give a balanced argument. It is much stronger at A-Level to acknowledge the counter-argument, and then explain why it is weaker than your argument. The paragraph on irony is strong, looking at the connotations of language used, but I would've liked slightly more focus on the tragedy of Willy. If I were doing this essay, I would've linked "Happy will continue to pursue it" to the helplessness of the audience to prevent Happy's similar downfall, showing the power of the American Dream in causing a tragic downfall. Catharsis is explained well, and this is a high level concept examiners will be pleased to see explored.

Quality of writing

This essay has an awful structure. As mentioned above, it doesn't really engage with the question until a few paragraphs in. The introduction is exactly what examiners don't want to see: a group of irrelevant contextual points with a short plot summary and no engagement with the task. Similarly, ending with a Shakespeare quote does nothing to your argument. In fact, it probably worsens your argument as you have lost the opportunity to end with a insightful conclusion. There are times where this essay uses the first person, and I would advise against this. A personal tone is not appropriate for A-Level, and it weakens your argument as it makes your views seem more personal rather than backed by evidence and analysis.

Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by groat 29/06/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Arthur Miller essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Death of a Salesman: Is Willy Loman a tragic hero or a tragic victim?

    5 star(s)

    To put it into context, Miller was writing during a time of post-war economy, when American confidence, prosperity and security was high. The playwright's criticism of an obscure American Dream, that no longer encouraged people to "be recognised for who they are, regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or

  2. Biff (of his father): He had the wrong dreams. All, all, wrong. Discuss Biff's ...

    in part motivated by the fact that w***y knew nothing of and received nothing from his father. However, w***y's decision to make his family "rich" through his death and the insurance money is a wrong dream; he does not let go of his fantasy and face his failures as a salesman, husband and father.

  1. How are issues of personal dignity dramatically portrayed in Death of a Salesman?

    initially, despite knowing fullwell that he has had an overall unsuccessful trip, he still boasts to Linda about making lots of money there. Could it be that w***y has false pride? That he is merely pretending to have such success to appear to Linda as very dignified?

  2. Is Biff the True Hero of Death of a Salesman?

    Attention, attention must be finally paid to such a person". (Pg 38) w***y Loman the main character of the play is a man loyal to the American Dream, a dream that was portrayed to so many Americans by echoing voices of legends such as Benjamin Franklin: "The way to wealth was industry" (Allan.2011.

  1. Act 4 of The Crucible provides a powerfully dramatic conclusion to the play. ...

    - Act One, Page 18 and 42. Miller very wisely displays John's character as "Only Human" by exposing the modern day human weaknesses. This heightens the emotion and tension of the climax of John's death and the audience's reaction to this.

  2. Death of a Salesman. 'Explore the relationship between Willy and his sons'

    Biff is everything w***y and Happy are not. He had opted out of the dream. He appears to have spent certain amount of his time in prison for stealing. He has completely rejected w***y's aspirational view of the world. How ironic perhaps, that through a thief such as Biff, Miller

  1. Miller presents Will Loman as a failure in many aspects of his life. To ...

    again in his mind, and it is his failure to let go, his failure to realise that he already has what he needs to be happy - a loving wife, children, his own house and car - that, in Linda's words, he's "doing well enough", which underpins his failure as

  2. How Fear Encourages Selfishness in "The Crucible".

    an alteration in motives; her attempt to maintain status and conceal the lies she?s spurn becomes the new focus. To maintain her standing as leader, she utilizes fear as her main weapon. By questioning Danforth?s authority by asking him whether or not he thinks ?to be so mighty that the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work