• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How far and in what ways do the opening three scenes constitute a suitably problematic opening to Measure for Measure?

Extracts from this document...


How far and in what ways do the opening three scenes constitute a suitably problematic opening to Measure for Measure? Measure for Measure as a play is deeply renowned for being a' problem play"; that is to say, there are many unresolved items and unanswered questions throughout. Therefore in order to make the opening 'suitable ' for a play of this calibre, the opening must also be 'suitably problematic" in order to pique the audience's interest sufficiently to ensure that they will be just as intrigued by the rest of the play as they are by the beginning. The play's moral dilemma mainly concerns the Duke, who can be seen as manipulating others' lives without the slightest bit of regard for the consequences. It is unsure how we are meant to consider him, because even after these initial scenes enough doubt has already been raised about his motives to make the audience rather suspicious. In this play, the first three scenes contain just as many, if not more unanswered scenarios, which help to ensure that the play commences as it means to go on, and hints at the events to follow. At the start of Act 1 Scene 1, due to it being the very first scene, you would think that the play would have a clearly defined beginning, so that the audience are able to be fully aware of all the events taking place, and to a certain extent be totally omniscient of what is happening. ...read more.


Of course, the Duke is the one who makes the main decision, and regardless of what Escalus' opinion is, the Duke is the one who controls the entire situation. In this circumstance, his motives are deeply ambiguous, as they are indeed even in the rest of the play. It is confusing why he chooses to disguise himself as a friar, since at the time of the play being performed, Catholics were not usually trusted at all, let alone with the inner workings of someone's life. However here Catholicism is referred to throughout; whether it is because Isabella is a Catholic nun of one of the strictest orders, or because of marriage (which is another suitably problematic issue on its own), nonetheless it is a key fragment of the play's content. In Scene 2, we come across for the first time some of the examples which prove the existence of Vienna's underworld. Lucio, Pompey and the other Gentlemen are prime examples of this; however it is truly unclear as to what the audience are meant to think of them. By all means, they do use such coarse expressions as would be expected to be heard from the worst characters, such as "French crown" referring of course to syphilis. By the mentions of sexual diseases, the audience therefore presume them to be the negative characters of the play; however it is unclear as to whether all morally ambiguous behaviour should also be condemned. ...read more.


This is rather problematic because the audience is more used to the characters' motives being clear-cut and easy to understand, unlike Isabella's complex multi-layered personality. This is a problem play, but it can be seen that the characters being unable to be understood in one step too far from just the events of the play being problematic. Measure for Measure is a Shakespearian problem play, which sharply addresses some of the issues of the law of the day when it came to the balance between justice and mercy, or the attitudes towards non-witnessed marriage. However this play takes it one step further than there simply being difficulties to overcome; most of the play's background is in fact completely unknown. Whole conversations, except for their conclusions, are omitted, characters are not clearly described, reasons for peoples' actions are unknown, and even motives are unclear. However when these three scenes are put in context with the rest of the play, it goes from being overly problematic to in fact just suitably so. The issues raised here are not created just to confuse the audience, but to provoke a well thought out mental response from them, prompted by the characters' opinions. These problems are referred to constantly throughout the play, and help to give it the conclusion that it has; not completely resolved of course, but as much as could be expected from such a problematical play. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Measure for Measure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Measure for Measure essays

  1. Discuss the theme of deception and disguise in the play "Measure for Measure."

    In Measure for Measure, Mistress Overdone walks around freely and it is common knowledge she runs a brothel and that it is very popular. The image of the "baby beats the nurse" makes another comparison with an unnatural situation as an indication of how far out of hand the situation in Vienna really is.

  2. Comment on Shakespeare's conclusion to 'Measure for Measure'

    He also requests the aggrieved women to petition him at the gates for justice. However the next day despite Angelo's promise to Isabella he stills issue her brother's execution. Friar Lodowick reveals his true identity to the Provost to prevent Claudio's execution.

  1. Consider Act II of "Measure for Measure", with regard to ideas of Justice and ...

    But the fundamental aspect is missing since the injustice within Claudio's case marks this out in particular making the sentence particularly unfair. Strength is used without too much wisdom here, as is referred to by Isabella with the phrase "giants strength".

  2. How does Shakespeare interest his audience with both the moral debate and the action ...

    Moments such as when Elbow confuses 'benefactors' with 'malefactors' and 'suspected' with 'respected' offer It would appear that these exchanges were put in place for solely comedic purposes that would perhaps have been highly entertaining to Shakespearean audience.

  1. Presentation of Escalus in Measure for Measure

    This is similar to his view on Claudio's fate for the reason that he also is a man who comes from a good family and has wealth behind him, he says he "Had a most noble father" (p20) On the other hand, this was a general view held at this time in society.

  2. Angelo, Escalus and the Duke present three kinds of ruler. How does Act I ...

    This confirms our suspicions that the Duke has not been the best, most consistent ruler. Vienna has gone into a state of slackness, where some vital laws no longer apply. He suggests to the Friar that Angelo is the more appropriate man to awaken all these laws than himself.

  1. What evidence is these in the play to support these opinions? How do you ...

    Furthermore, Shakespeare makes Angelo describe his new feelings for Isabel as a "strong and swelling evil", which makes us think that Angelo is still 'good' as he sees it as a bad thing. This is seen also when Angelo talks about his greatest love, studying; "good thing...grown sere and tedious".

  2. More than our brother is our chastity How far do you find yourself able ...

    Epitia refuses indignantly ?My brother?s life? she says with noble fierceness ?is indeed very dear to me, but my honour is far dearer: my life I would willingly lose to save his, but I will not preserve him with my honour? so it could be argued that dilemma?s like this

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work