If Hamlet is mad, then there is no tragedy - Discuss Hamlet's madness is feigned, faked and put on - period! If he was truly mad then how can there be a tragedy in the full Greek sense

Authors Avatar

If Hamlet is mad, then there is no tragedy – Discuss

Hamlet’s madness is feigned, faked and put on – period!

If he was truly mad then how can there be a tragedy in the full Greek sense of the term?

Macbeth may have shown shades of madness/desperation towards the end of his life – he was, after all corrupted by evil, but ‘Hamlet’ is a ‘Revenger’s Tragedy’ not a ‘let’s all go mad and kill everyone’, history play.

The key lies in 2 quotations:

“………I will put on an antic disposition’

and:

“..I can tell a hawk from a handsaw”

Join now!

NB: This is a mistranslation. Shakespeare actually wrote – “…a hawk from a hernshaw” – a ‘hernshaw’ being ancient English for a heron! You can see how he is saying starkly – ‘I am not mad unless I want to be and you suckers can’t see it!’

So, even though he knew Rosencrantz and Guildenstern were in league with his avowed enemy, King Claudius, he was brave enough to tell them that he was sane.

So, he tells those he trusts that he is sane and will feign madness and with all the others – Ophelia, Polonius, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay